- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/31/08 at 2:48 pm to MOT
i agree Hatch is our best shot this year at going 8-4 but next year is our year 
Posted on 8/31/08 at 2:48 pm to OBUDan
Is there a reason why JJ did not get a chance? Secret weapon of some sort when the play book is opened up?
Posted on 8/31/08 at 2:49 pm to I-59 Tiger
Take the glasses off Mrs. Beasley and wear them, yourself.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 2:53 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
Lee outplayed Hatch
fail
Posted on 8/31/08 at 2:57 pm to I-59 Tiger
Lee was confident enough to stare down a receiver and throw a risky ball without looking around enough and paying attention enough to what the safeties were doing.
Lee's confidence that you like will get him as many INTs as TDs.
Lee's confidence that you like will get him as many INTs as TDs.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:03 pm to I-59 Tiger
What game were you watching? I could not possibly disagree with you any more. Hatch looked like a veteran compared to Lee. I think the competition is effectively over. Hatch will start vs. Auburn.
I did like Lee's arm, however. He has a lot of velocity on his throws.
I did like Lee's arm, however. He has a lot of velocity on his throws.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:05 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
What game were you watching?
quote:me too.
I could not possibly disagree with you any more.
quote:Truth
Hatch looked like a veteran compared to Lee
quote:Likely.
Hatch will start vs. Auburn.
quote:I hope not, but I hope a starter is set in stone by Auburn.
I think the competition is effectively over.
quote:Agreed.
I did like Lee's arm, however. He has a lot of velocity on his throws.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:08 pm to joe68
quote:
i agree Hatch is our best shot this year at going 8-4 but next year is our year
So if next year is our year, why not allow Lee (who should be the starter next year) get as many snaps as possible so that he doesn't have to go through all those growing pains again next year.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:09 pm to Tigercat
quote:
Lee's confidence that you like will get him as many INTs as TDs.
And probably twice as many as Hatch in both categories... it's a give and take.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:09 pm to OBUDan
quote:
why not allow Jefferson (who should be the starter next year) get as many snaps as possible so that he doesn't have to go through all those growing pains again next year.
Agree, with corrections.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:13 pm to Roaad
quote:
Agree, with corrections.
While I think Jefferson is easily the most talented of the three, you have to figure that next year, he will be about where Lee is this year... the same Lee you think isn't as good of an option as Hatch
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:18 pm to OBUDan
quote:I am about 99% certain that JJ will get infinitely more game snaps this year, than JL did last year.
While I think Jefferson is easily the most talented of the three, you have to figure that next year, he will be about where Lee is this year... the same Lee you think isn't as good of an option as Hatch
because any positive number is infinitely greater than zero.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:26 pm to Roaad
quote:
I am about 99% certain that JJ will get infinitely more game snaps this year, than JL did last year.
because any positive number is infinitely greater than zero.
5 snaps a game in mop up duty do not prepare someone for a season.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:27 pm to OBUDan
quote:That would be more than Hatch and Lee got combined.
5 snaps a game in mop up duty do not prepare someone for a season.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:28 pm to OBUDan
quote:
Lee's confidence that you like will get him as many INTs as TDs.
So did Hatch but the DB's didn't catch his bad passes. If Hatch did throw the 2 INT's that should have been caught we wouldn't be having this discussion.
quote:Because Rantards + Logic = Does Not Compute
So if next year is our year, why not allow Lee (who should be the starter next year) get as many snaps as possible so that he doesn't have to go through all those growing pains again next year.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:31 pm to Acreboy
quote:Since we are talking hypotheticals, what about the two or three more that Lee should have had?
So did Hatch but the DB's didn't catch his bad passes. If Hatch did throw the 2 INT's that should have been caught we wouldn't be having this discussion.
If Hatch had 2 INT's and Lee was sportin' 4, the discussion would be the same.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:33 pm to OBUDan
quote:
And probably twice as many as Hatch in both categories... it's a give and take.
I don't think it is. I think you have to trust the skill position talent. You trust that Crowton can engineer an awesome short passing game and dominating running game with the excellent athletes we have.
You go with the known commodity that can get our athletes the ball with less risk of giving the game away. To do otherwise is way more give than take. To do otherwise would be the equivalent of starting KW at RB right now. The potential reward is not worth the risk.
Posted on 8/31/08 at 3:35 pm to Acreboy
quote:
So did Hatch but the DB's didn't catch his bad passes. If Hatch did throw the 2 INT's that should have been caught we wouldn't be having this discussion.
I only saw one real possible INT by Hatch, and that went through Dickson's hands first and foremost. If Hatch starts throwing INTS, then by all means give the ball to Lee.
Popular
Back to top



1




