- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:18 pm to CaptainPanic
quote:
You’re wondering why a QB who put up letter stats than Burrow is ranked higher than him?
Burrow and Mond’s season stats were nearly identical. Same completion percentage, same YPA, similar TD/Int ratio, nearly identical QBR. Stats are the same but Burrow arrived on campus in June, while Mond was a second year starter.
Burrow’s leadership qualities easily pass Mond’s.
This post was edited on 4/27/19 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:19 pm to The First Cut
And clemson to start the season vs clemson at end of season.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:20 pm to EvrybodysAllAmerican
quote:
Burrow outplayed him by far in that game.
By far?


OH MY GOD KELLEN MOND IS ONE SPOT ABOVE JOE BURROW IN SOME MEANINGLESS RANKING IT'S RIDICULOUS

Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:21 pm to NamariTiger
quote:
You think Mond puts up those numbers against a Clemson team that was finally in form at the end of the season rather than the beginning when you’re working out kinks?
Maybe?
Tua also didn't have to deal with Dexter Lawrence up the middle.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:22 pm to Jack Crevalle
I don't know if Mond is top 3, but his improvement from year 1 to 2 was noticeable from the get go.
prob got much better coaching from Jimbo than Summy though
I'm expecting Joe B to be battling for the top 2 with brady's tutelage.
prob got much better coaching from Jimbo than Summy though
I'm expecting Joe B to be battling for the top 2 with brady's tutelage.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:24 pm to rmnldr
Just stop arguing this Kellen Mond crap. No one said he’s bad, we said Burrow is better, because he is. Yes Burrow outplayed Mond easily. More completions on less attempts, better average per attempt, a better rating, 0 interceptions, more rushing yards, better rushing average, more touchdowns. The only thing Mond had was the passing touchdowns and some of those were crap. Mond made some big plays late, but his completion percentage didn’t even eclipse 50%. I still remember that snap fumble, and him throwing a game ending interception which should have ended the game right there.
This post was edited on 4/27/19 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:25 pm to The Egg
quote:
I don't know if Mond is top 3, but his improvement from year 1 to 2 was noticeable from the get go.
That’s typical of most QBs. Year two improvement is usually significant. We should see the same with Burrow in 2019.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:28 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
Buckeye Joe will be here shortly to tell you Burrow is better than Tua.
Starting a thread about Burrow is like a bat signal to Buckeye Joe.

Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:30 pm to Jack Crevalle
Don't know why you guys get so worked up over someone's opinion. He'll have every opportunity to prove this guy wrong, and isn't that sweeter?
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:32 pm to Jack Crevalle
Burrow is about to blow up. This fall will be a thing of beauty.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:33 pm to rmnldr
Weak crap...I mean crop of quarterbacks.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:45 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
Buckeye Joe will be here shortly to tell you Burrow is better than Tua.
Mike Locksley is Maryland's HC, and Bama's RPO guru, Gattis is Michigan's new OC. So Sark is running Bama's offense.
JB will be in a great scheme. Tua will be in a 1990's scheme (like Burrow was last year - maybe 1970's scheme is more accurate for JB)
All that considered, there's a good chance JB outperforms Tua this season.
This post was edited on 4/27/19 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:47 pm to TheTexasTiger7
quote:
we said Burrow is better, because he is
Solid evidence. Burrow is better...
just because he is.

quote:
Yes Burrow outplayed Mond easily. More completions on less attempts, better average per attempt, a better rating, 0 interceptions, more rushing yards, better rushing average, more touchdowns. The only thing Mond had was the passing touchdowns and some of those were crap. Mond made some big plays late, but his completion percentage didn’t even eclipse 50%. I still remember that snap fumble and his knee being down which should have ended the game right there.
Holy spin cycle. Aren't you the guy that had your post deleted from the gymnastics thread because you were being a pervert? And are you TexasTiger on 247?
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:52 pm to Jack Crevalle
Mond has a higher ceiling than Burrow.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 2:54 pm to the paradigm
quote:
Mond has a higher ceiling than Burrow.
You can't say that around these parts, baw.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 3:00 pm to Jack Crevalle
why would anyone care one iota about some silly ranking like this?
Posted on 4/27/19 at 3:04 pm to the paradigm
quote:
Mond has a higher ceiling than Burrow

Posted on 4/27/19 at 3:42 pm to Brazos
Wish I had more likes to give
Popular
Back to top
