- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jeremy Hill formally charged with simple battery
Posted on 7/9/13 at 6:10 pm to harry coleman beast
Posted on 7/9/13 at 6:10 pm to harry coleman beast
1
Posted on 7/9/13 at 6:14 pm to redfieldk717
Blue is gonna treat opposing defenses like they're all participants in the gay pride parade.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 6:17 pm to harry coleman beast
Bahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahaha
Posted on 7/9/13 at 6:19 pm to redfieldk717
Posted on 7/9/13 at 6:35 pm to harry coleman beast
quote:
Blue is gonna treat opposing defenses like they're all participants in the gay pride parade.
"Ain't no little boys out here between them lines"
Posted on 7/9/13 at 7:12 pm to charate
quote:
sure it does. Lack of consent makes it a felony. Consent makes it a misdemeanor. good call though
You a lawyer?
Guessing you're not. If you were, you'd know that a minor is incapable of consenting to sex with an adult as a matter of law.
What affects the felony and misdemeanor designation is the age difference between the parties.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 7:44 pm to Mitchell613
Give it a rest dude!
She blew half the fricking team!
She blew half the fricking team!
Posted on 7/9/13 at 7:58 pm to TheDoc
quote:
She blew half the fricking team!
out of line...
Posted on 7/9/13 at 9:13 pm to ForeLSU
21 pages of nonsense and going!
Posted on 7/9/13 at 9:21 pm to harry coleman beast
Posted on 7/9/13 at 10:57 pm to charate
quote:
consenting 14-year old
No such thing bud
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:01 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
he would serve out the 6 months in jail.
Court doesn't have to give credit for time served so he could be given the full length of original sentence. Up to the judge basically, but it is likely they would give him just the remainder unless the judge wants to prove a point
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:46 pm to CapitalCityTiger
quote:
No such thing bud
I know not in the eyes of the law but in the eyes of the people that viewed the tape it was very obvious it was consensual.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:56 pm to LSUdm21
quote:
I know not in the eyes of the law but in the eyes of the people that viewed the tape it was very obvious it was consensual.
Geez, give it a damn rest.
Spin it any way you want but when you're done tearing the kid down, he's still on probation, he has had restrictions placed on that probation prior to him being formally charged with simple battery (a misdemeanor).
Provided he abides by those restrictions along with his earlier probation conditions, which he has, he will be good to go, IMO.
I'm stunned at how many want to just dump on the kid and don't want to look back when they were that age and pretend they didn't do anything wrong. Ever.
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:00 am to la_birdman
quote:
Geez, give it a damn rest.
Spin it any way you want but when you're done tearing the kid down, he's still on probation, he has had restrictions placed on that probation prior to him being formally charged with simple battery (a misdemeanor).
Provided he abides by those restrictions along with his earlier probation conditions, which he has, he will be good to go, IMO.
I'm stunned at how many want to just dump on the kid and don't want to look back when they were that age and pretend they didn't do anything wrong. Ever.
Lolwut???
I'm actually taking up for him.
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:06 am to LSUdm21
My apologies, I didn't mean to click on the reply button so it was directed at you.
This post was edited on 7/10/13 at 12:21 am
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:24 am to la_birdman
quote:
I'm stunned at how many want to just dump on the kid and don't want to look back when they were that age and pretend they didn't do anything wrong. Ever.
Eh, none of us had the privilege of being a highly touted athlete as he is. Whether you agree or not, he's close to losing all of it.
He was given a solid chance after strike one, and probably will be after strike two. He better lock his arse away for the next 6 months or so. I don't think he's a thug or necessarily a bad person but he's got to be more careful for someone in his position.
I was involved in a fight following an arrest for an alcohol related offense years ago (and it was self defense, they just said I went too far) and the the judge ripped e a new one in court. They did make me serve time.
This post was edited on 7/10/13 at 12:28 am
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:31 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Eh, none of us had the privilege of being a highly touted athlete as he is. Whether you agree or not, he's close to losing all of it.
And I understand that. He is close to losing it, I agree.
But as of present time, he hasn't so dumping on him because he screwed up, and has gone to court for that, just for the heck of it is pretty small minded. (not saying you are doing that. but there are a few)
Right now the kid has kept his nose clean. That's the point I'm trying to make.
This post was edited on 7/10/13 at 3:28 am
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:44 am to la_birdman
quote:
Right now the kid has kept his nose clean. That's the point I'm trying to make.
Yes he does. One more and he's in deep shite. I'm hoping he can pull it off, but if he don't, LSU is still in good hands with the current backfield.
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:48 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
One more and he's in deep shite.
I don't think anyone disagrees with that.
Page 21 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News