Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Is UNSURETIGER en route to Birmingham to provide play by play?

Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:14 am
Posted by Spocks Brain
Member since Nov 2025
354 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:14 am
Would be nice to have boots on the ground for this one.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
26088 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:16 am to
When is the hearing?
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
12655 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:17 am to
1 pm
Posted by Spocks Brain
Member since Nov 2025
354 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:17 am to
1:00pm CST
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
117582 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:19 am to
Bruce Rogers of Bainbridge Mims Rogers & Smith LLP of Birmingham is listed as counsel of record for defendants.

Was Managing Editor of Vanderbilt Law Review
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:22 am
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
26088 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:20 am to
Thanks
Posted by tigafan4life
Member since Dec 2006
51185 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:21 am to
Do bama fed courts broadcast hearings? Need to watch something during my lunch.
Posted by Spocks Brain
Member since Nov 2025
354 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:22 am to
Law Degree from Vanderbilt- I’ll take it!
Posted by Spocks Brain
Member since Nov 2025
354 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:24 am to
According to our resident board attorney - no federal district cases are ever broadcast
Posted by GeauxGriff
Member since Dec 2022
56 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:26 am to
I would expect it to be significantly shorter. Oral arguments on venue, the manufactured emergency of the meeting tomorrow/threshold issues of the bogus 1A claim, and getting around the Anti-injunction Act.

Still interesting, but not the sexy testimony driven hearing they had last week at the 19th JDC.

What would make things very interesting is if the court holds venue is proper and LSU turns around and files a Sherman act claim.
Posted by diehard24
Member since Oct 2006
545 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:36 am to
Shouldn't it be dismissed as moot? Or lack of jurisdiction for no active controversy?
Posted by GeauxGriff
Member since Dec 2022
56 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:00 pm to
I don’t think it’s moot because the SEC specifically phrased the complaint to claim the First Amendment injury persists even if LSU never rosters the players. Filling the roster probably kills any genuine argument that emergency relief is necessary, though.

There are definitely jurisdiction and venue questions though. Having to do with what exactly the SEC is as an entity, LSU as an arm of the state, etc. If the court rules favorably for LSU on those they won’t even get into the meat of the lawsuit today.
Posted by CecildaDiesel
Member since Jun 2020
327 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:08 pm to
I think the whole hearing gets continued, and no vote happens. Literally filed an amendment yesterday, and Murrill said no one had even been served yet
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram