- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is UNSURETIGER en route to Birmingham to provide play by play?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:14 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:14 am
Would be nice to have boots on the ground for this one.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:19 am to Spocks Brain
Bruce Rogers of Bainbridge Mims Rogers & Smith LLP of Birmingham is listed as counsel of record for defendants.
Was Managing Editor of Vanderbilt Law Review
Was Managing Editor of Vanderbilt Law Review
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:22 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:21 am to Spocks Brain
Do bama fed courts broadcast hearings?
Need to watch something during my lunch.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:22 am to udtiger
Law Degree from Vanderbilt- I’ll take it!
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:24 am to tigafan4life
According to our resident board attorney - no federal district cases are ever broadcast
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:26 am to Spocks Brain
I would expect it to be significantly shorter. Oral arguments on venue, the manufactured emergency of the meeting tomorrow/threshold issues of the bogus 1A claim, and getting around the Anti-injunction Act.
Still interesting, but not the sexy testimony driven hearing they had last week at the 19th JDC.
What would make things very interesting is if the court holds venue is proper and LSU turns around and files a Sherman act claim.
Still interesting, but not the sexy testimony driven hearing they had last week at the 19th JDC.
What would make things very interesting is if the court holds venue is proper and LSU turns around and files a Sherman act claim.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:36 am to GeauxGriff
Shouldn't it be dismissed as moot? Or lack of jurisdiction for no active controversy?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:00 pm to diehard24
I don’t think it’s moot because the SEC specifically phrased the complaint to claim the First Amendment injury persists even if LSU never rosters the players. Filling the roster probably kills any genuine argument that emergency relief is necessary, though.
There are definitely jurisdiction and venue questions though. Having to do with what exactly the SEC is as an entity, LSU as an arm of the state, etc. If the court rules favorably for LSU on those they won’t even get into the meat of the lawsuit today.
There are definitely jurisdiction and venue questions though. Having to do with what exactly the SEC is as an entity, LSU as an arm of the state, etc. If the court rules favorably for LSU on those they won’t even get into the meat of the lawsuit today.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:08 pm to Spocks Brain
I think the whole hearing gets continued, and no vote happens. Literally filed an amendment yesterday, and Murrill said no one had even been served yet
Popular
Back to top
4







