Started By
Message

re: Is the QB position back open?

Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:10 pm to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Those are your only options? You are your own problem.


At best.......... world of options........at worst.

I've clearly articulated why it is a lazy comparison at best. Do I need to do it again?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104104 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

At best.......... world of options........at worst.

I've clearly articulated why it is a lazy comparison at best. Do I need to do it again?
It is hilarious grouping Mauck/Flynn/Mett together.

It would be like saying:

"We need Etling to be a Rodgers/Alex Smith/Brett Favre type of QB."
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Dude, Mauck, Flynn, and Mett have nothing in common really besides being white

So the fact those three are grouped together alone is hilarious


I've already explained this to him.

Mauck was a nice balance between Mett who could sling it but couldn't move and Flynn who could run well but was mediocre in the actual passing game and decision making.

Jefferson was a better QB in 2009 than Flynn was in 2007, as blasphemous as it may sound considering how he looked in 2010.

Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
36624 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Because Etling looks no better than Harris.
Where, in practice? Checkers?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85101 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

I'm wrong for thinking the better QB is better and should play?


well I've never argued otherwise concerning this

but you are wrong about Etling being "miles better"
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104104 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Where, in practice? Checkers?
No, in football games against decent teams

Posted by comalking
East Texas
Member since Jan 2015
217 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:17 pm to
As long as it is not Harris, I'm open for anyone.
Posted by justustm2
Member since Sep 2005
4158 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:17 pm to
Sure Mr. Right Wing nut living in a PC world. Isn't it terrible there is pressure to respect others? Can't just call them ni$$&rs, ch&$ks, etc. any more in public. Or treat them like you could in the past.

Want to know a persons true character? Check their postings on the political board. They reveal their true nature there. And you sir would have us believe race is not an issue for you? And please explain what you mean when you say white people are tired and will do something soon? A Lynch mob like before the politically correct days? Or do you have something bigger like genocide in mind?
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20500 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Want to know a persons true character? Check their postings on the political board

Grow up. Want to know a person's character? Know them in real life day to day.

Get off the computer.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281886 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:19 pm to
quote:


Harris stretched the field last year. We were 38th in YPA (7.8 yds) and 7th in yards per completion (14.6).




That's because Harris throws deep. It's about all he can do, drop back and heave it. Still, the defense stuffed the box. No one respected or respects the passing game.

Harris is a lost cause.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281886 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

ure Mr. Right Wing nut living in a PC world. Isn't it terrible there is pressure to respect others? Can't just call them ni$$&rs, ch&$ks, etc. any more in public. Or treat them like you could in the past.

Want to know a persons true character? Check their postings on the political board. They reveal their true nature there. And you sir would have us believe race is not an issue for you? And please explain what you mean when you say white people are tired and will do something soon? A Lynch mob like before the politically correct days? Or do you have something bigger like genocide in mind?



What the frick?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

What the frick?


Yeah that escalated quickly.

I was just asking him to clarify what he thought a "Mauck/Flynn/Mett" type of QB was supposed to be.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
36624 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

No, in football games against decent teams
When Etling misses it looks better than half of Harris' completions. He is also more of a dual threat than Harris.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

When Etling misses it looks better than half of Harris' completions




This shite is tiresome if we're going to just throw out grossly inaccurate hyperbole. The same with the passes "10 yards over the WR's head". Harris is inaccurate at times. Let's keep it to the facts.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104104 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

I was just asking him to clarify what he thought a "Mauck/Flynn/Mett" type of QB was supposed to be.
White. I am going to start asking for a Rodgers/Alex Smith/Favre type of QB.

Or

A Moon/Vick/Jamarcus type of QB
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

I am going to start asking for a Rodgers/Alex Smith/Favre type of QB.


That is actually a damn good comparison - albeit on a different level - for Mauck/Flynn/Mett. Nicely done. We could also use more Luck/Russell Wilson/Manning types of QBs, and I know what race Wilson is.
Posted by justustm2
Member since Sep 2005
4158 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:33 pm to
Reality Tiger, is that what stood out to you in my post? Actually, not surprising. I assumed his comrades would show up to support him. It is alway predictable that those with similar viewpoints will defend their positions. Ask an honest person if, for many, the race of the QB is important, they would admit yes. Ask a racist and their answer is you are a race baiter, as if that is somehow worst than being a racist.
Posted by El Magnifico
La casa de tu mamá
Member since Jan 2014
7017 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:33 pm to
Don't forget Randall Cunningham
Posted by CecilShortsHisPants
One Foty Fo uh uh Magnolia Screet
Member since Oct 2012
3374 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Dude, Mauck, Flynn, and Mett have nothing in common really besides being white



Ok dude, Mett was clearly the outlier. 6'5 gunslinger, awful pocket awareness, compares better to Jamarcus.

Flynn and Mauck were eerily similar in size, skills, and stats. To say Etling compares well to these guys is fair. Granted the small sample size.
Posted by justustm2
Member since Sep 2005
4158 posts
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:41 pm to
Check out his posts on the political board Roger and maybe you will get my drift. Of course he may have been conversing with you there. At any rate it was disingenuous for him to claim race of the QB doesn't matter to him. When he is threatening the retaliation of whites against blacks and cheering the death of blacks.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram