Started By
Message

re: Iowa Offense and the 3 TE set

Posted on 12/19/13 at 1:44 pm to
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76778 posts
Posted on 12/19/13 at 1:44 pm to
You're actually right and I'm deleting my comment. I'm just picturing Iowa grinding out long slow scoring drives by running right into this soft defense.
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Arkansas has a bunch of success on us throwing out of a multiple TE set. Hope we can get that worked out for the bowl game.


Yep. Lots of roll right and throw back to the left. Very few counters plays.

Will be interesting.
Posted by nchawk
Greensboro, NC
Member since Nov 2004
652 posts
Posted on 12/19/13 at 2:39 pm to
Iowa needs to play in a phone booth with you guys. It would be stupid for Iowa to try to spread you out and do the "get it to your athletes in space" since we don't have a lot of playmakers in the skill positions.

This is how they approached OSU since they have a lot of speed like LSU.

The hawks won't be exclusively be in "heavy packages". You'll see I formation with 3 wides and empty backfields in 3rd and long (oh geesh).

Your success defending iowa's O will come down to getting the Hawks "off schedule" on 1st down. This exactly what OSU did in the 2nd half and it worked. They played their gaps and stopped the run on 1st down.
Posted by MattLSU
New York
Member since Dec 2011
195 posts
Posted on 12/19/13 at 3:06 pm to
Great posts by Matt Foley and nchawk, thanks.
Posted by nchawk
Greensboro, NC
Member since Nov 2004
652 posts
Posted on 12/19/13 at 3:38 pm to
Speaking of long drives....(I'll try pasting this) and give link. I watched the Stanford Oregon Game this year. Stanford got the ball with 8+ minuites to play in the half and held the ball the whole time.

It was a thing of beauty.


Stanford at 8:26
1st and 10 at STAN 2 Tyler Gaffney rush for 2 yards to the Stanf 4.
2nd and 8 at STAN 4 Tyler Gaffney rush for 2 yards to the Stanf 6.
3rd and 6 at STAN 6 Kevin Hogan rush for 12 yards to the Stanf 18 for a 1ST down.
1st and 10 at STAN 18 Tyler Gaffney rush for 5 yards to the Stanf 23.
2nd and 5 at STAN 23 Tyler Gaffney rush for 6 yards to the Stanf 29 for a 1ST down.
1st and 10 at STAN 29 Kevin Hogan pass complete to Tyler Gaffney for 15 yards to the Stanf 44 for a 1ST down.
1st and 10 at STAN 44 Kevin Hogan pass incomplete to Ty Montgomery.
2nd and 10 at STAN 44 Tyler Gaffney rush for 3 yards to the Stanf 47.
3rd and 7 at STAN 47 Kevin Hogan rush for 11 yards to the Oregn 42 for a 1ST down.
1st and 10 at ORE 42 Ricky Seale rush for no gain to the Oregn 42.
2nd and 10 at ORE 42 Kevin Hogan pass complete to Ryan Hewitt for 6 yards to the Oregn 36.
3rd and 4 at ORE 36 Tyler Gaffney rush for 3 yards to the Oregn 33.
4th and 1 at ORE 33 Timeout STANFORD, clock 1:56.
4th and 1 at ORE 33 Tyler Gaffney rush for 4 yards to the Oregn 29 for a 1ST down.
1st and 10 at ORE 29 Kelsey Young rush for no gain to the Oregn 29.
2nd and 10 at ORE 29 Timeout OREGON, clock 1:18.
2nd and 10 at ORE 29 Kevin Hogan pass complete to Ryan Hewitt for 9 yards to the Oregn 20.
3rd and 1 at ORE 20 Tyler Gaffney rush for 3 yards to the Oregn 17 for a 1ST down.
1st and 10 at ORE 17 Timeout STANFORD, clock 0:37.
1st and 10 at ORE 17 Ty Montgomery rush for 14 yards to the Oregn 3 for a 1ST down.
1st and Goal at ORE 3 Tyler Gaffney rush for no gain to the Oregn 3.
2nd and Goal at ORE 3 Timeout STANFORD, clock 0:11.
2nd and Goal at ORE 3 Kevin Hogan pass incomplete.
3rd and Goal at ORE 3 OREGON penalty 1 yard Pass Interference on Troy Hill accepted.
1st and Goal at ORE 2 Timeout OREGON, clock 00:01.
1st and Goal at ORE 2 Jordan Williamson 19 yard field goal GOOD.


Those 3rd and long gash runs are devestating to a defense.
This post was edited on 12/19/13 at 3:41 pm
Posted by BrewHawk
Lucas, TX
Member since Nov 2004
319 posts
Posted on 12/19/13 at 8:44 pm to
If I were Chavis, I would man up on the WRs, bracket the TE(s) with a safety deep and LB short and keep 8 in the box.

There's no question LSU has more athletes than the Hawks, but I think Iowa has a schematic advantage if LSU doesn't force the issue with their speed.

I would blitz all day long from every different angle possible and not let Iowa breathe. It may lead to a broken play here or there, but it might also absolutely overwhelm an Iowa offense that will desperately attempt to possess the ball for longer than LSU does.

Watch the first half of the Michigan St. game and you'll see what I'm talking about. Play side slants because there's no cutback to worry about from Weisman. Now, Iowa has countered this by giving Canzeri more playing time and he does cut back very well, but I would sell out to stop the run and make Iowa's receivers try to beat the Tiger DBs.

I think that if LSU takes this approach and absolutely stymies the Iowa offense, that it could be the one way (barring a bunch of turnovers) that the Tigers blow out the Hawkeyes.

We do still have a solid D to fall back on, but if they're on the field all game long due to a poor offensive performance, Iowa is in big trouble.
Posted by Folsom
Folsom
Member since Mar 2006
3309 posts
Posted on 12/19/13 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

they gonna run all over us


Yea, if Chief doesn't come up with a "special d", then we "gonna be in fo a wurmin."
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68664 posts
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

If this has been talked about I apologize. My boss is a huge Iowa fan, and we have been talking match ups and he mentioned that he thinks Iowa will do a heavy amount of 3 TE sets as they did against Ohio St. and Michigan St. Is this good, or bad for us?


Depends, is DJ Welter starting at MLB once again?

If so, yes.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76778 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 1:01 am to
LSU wasn't that great at stopping the pass either. Every team except aTm oddly enough moved the ball on this defense.
Posted by Malaysian Tiger
Manila
Member since May 2008
4732 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 1:20 am to
In the old days before the war if someone ran that type of formaion which they did then we ran at that time called a 65 Apex Defense. Then we would jam the two tightends and not let them out and that is very imperative. The other guy can be covered. This is a very limited offense and allows the Defense to really jam everything up. The disadvantage to this Defense if they break a Running Back clean through the line and then he is gone because there is no one to stop him.
Posted by nchawk
Greensboro, NC
Member since Nov 2004
652 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 7:37 am to
YOu can skip through this to get a good sense of what iowa's 3 TE offense looks like IOWA-OSU
This post was edited on 12/20/13 at 7:39 am
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17500 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 9:39 am to
quote:


The Welter comments are getting old. I don't understand LSU fans wanting to constantly bash the guy.


Posted by inthebr
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
875 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Stanford Oregon Game


That was impressive.

Posters saying man up wide and stack the box are correct, IMO. The most important position to watch is DT. Anthony Johnson had a terrible game against Arkansas, ending most plays on his back side or overrunning the play. If he can eat up a couple of blocks I have absolute confidence that Welter, Kwon and Barrow will eat up the run. The LBs have looked bad all season when D line has played undisciplined, and they've played well when the D line plays well. Against a 3TE set, power run game the play of the D line will be the determining factor. Thomas and LaCouture have looked capable in spots, and Ego has played pretty well all year. If Johnson brings it and the ends play like they have most of the year then I see the Tigers holding Iowa to single digits.
Posted by MATT F0LEY
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Member since Dec 2013
14 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 10:07 am to
quote:

If I were Chavis, I would man up on the WRs, bracket the TE(s) with a safety deep and LB short and keep 8 in the box.

There's no question LSU has more athletes than the Hawks, but I think Iowa has a schematic advantage if LSU doesn't force the issue with their speed.

I would blitz all day long from every different angle possible and not let Iowa breathe. It may lead to a broken play here or there, but it might also absolutely overwhelm an Iowa offense that will desperately attempt to possess the ball for longer than LSU does.

Watch the first half of the Michigan St. game and you'll see what I'm talking about. Play side slants because there's no cutback to worry about from Weisman. Now, Iowa has countered this by giving Canzeri more playing time and he does cut back very well, but I would sell out to stop the run and make Iowa's receivers try to beat the Tiger DBs.

I think that if LSU takes this approach and absolutely stymies the Iowa offense, that it could be the one way (barring a bunch of turnovers) that the Tigers blow out the Hawkeyes.

We do still have a solid D to fall back on, but if they're on the field all game long due to a poor offensive performance, Iowa is in big trouble.


With all due respect to you and the Tiger fans, LSU's 2013 Outback Bowl defense does not look to have the horses to pull off the blitzkrieg as described above.

Corey Thompson (#1 FS - #2 SS) is out. #3 SS, Micah Eugene, has left the team. So outside of Loston, their senior #1 SS, there is no proven depth.

There is talk this week of working Mills (#1 corner) in at safety, and if that happens then Rashard Robinson will replace him, giving you (along with White) 2 true freshmen CBs who weigh in at 165 and 175, respectively. It also gives you a true soph FS in Mills, a freshman All-America corner back last year, playing out of his natural position with little depth behind him. There is Martin (Jr.) available if his foot heals, but beyond that you're looking at another TF in Rickey Jefferson.

There is high risk in blitzing safeties and undersized corners into Iowa's offense, especially with a big RB, FB and TEs available to block. They can have success in spots, but it will take a physical toll as the game wears on, which isn't what you want to have happen to a secondary whose depth is already razor thin. The corners will also have to provide consistent run support to the outside, with the receivers peeling off to take the safeties and either the FB, TE or pulling guard coming out side to seal the edge in front of a big RB.

I'm not picking on LSU or saying they can't be successful against Iowa on defense, but attacking them they way MSU did isn't the best strategy.

Les Miles said it best in his Monday press conference: this is going to be a fight for both teams for four quarters. Iowa is going do it's best on offense to pound, and pound, and pound away and see what happens the second half when attrition begins to set in for both teams.
Posted by tigers32
Member since Mar 2012
5651 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

The TE's are fairly big (6'7 265, 6'5 255 & 6'4 245) and compliment an athletic offensive line (Iowa's line is 15 lbs lighter than LSU's and built for zone blocking).

Iowa fans-is this how Ferentz typically wants his offensive line? Just curious.

I'd be careful of crowding the box too much with our defensive personnel. Chavis will have to pick his spots when to stack the LOS & when to blitz. We don't have Michigan St.'s defense. With that being said, I do think we can play more single-high safety looks against Iowa considering they don't have a scary deep threat.
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Speaking of long drives....(I'll try pasting this) and give link. I watched the Stanford Oregon Game this year. Stanford got the ball with 8+ minuites to play in the half and held the ball the whole time. It was a thing of beauty.


It was a very pretty game to watch until the last 4-5 mins.
Posted by AirRaidTT
Grapevine, TX
Member since May 2008
2683 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 1:26 pm to
I can only hope we are as good as NIU.

But in all seriousness, this is a bad matchup for Iowa.
Posted by nchawk
Greensboro, NC
Member since Nov 2004
652 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Iowa fans-is this how Ferentz typically wants his offensive line? Just curious.


Ferentz runs the style of play based on the talent he can usually get in Iowa. So we get lots of good linemen and tight ends and decent running backs. Iowa rarely gets those NFL wide receiver types.

So it's run first and run some more until they cheat and then throw in play action.

They practice running into the teeth of the defense and stacked boxes. Feretnz said once that evyerone stacks the box against Iowa. So execution is the key - they rely on exact execution rather than deception 95% of the time.


Posted by nchawk
Greensboro, NC
Member since Nov 2004
652 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I'd be careful of crowding the box too much with our defensive personnel. Chavis will have to pick his spots when to stack the LOS & when to blitz. We don't have Michigan St.'s defense. With that being said, I do think we can play more single-high safety looks against Iowa considering they don't have a scary deep threat.


It's not like Iowa will score 4 TDs. I expect a variety of D looks from LSU.

Nebraksa and Michigan, by the eye test, were a lot more athletic than Iowa. But Iowa was able to go over to top once or twice.

Iowa will take shots down the field but they certainly don't make a living doing it. Our slot receiver got open down field a few times and made some nice plays 1 on 1 against a DB against Nebraska.
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44599 posts
Posted on 12/20/13 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

There is high risk in blitzing safeties and undersized corners into Iowa's offense


if we're in base personnel, we don't blitz the DBs that much. pretty much never bring the CBs. all you're really gonna get is Loston playing down in the box and maybe coming off the edge here and there. he will blitz the LBs though.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram