Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

If you can’t see that Sloan is a problem then you’re lying to yourself.

Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:20 am
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
22690 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:20 am
3 picks last night were on Nuss. I’m not saying he isn’t partly to blame.

But the offense has become quite predictable.

From a running perspective we run two things. We run , where we first motion on Taylor to block.

Then we also run a read option in which our QB who refuses to run never keeps the ball.

From a passing standpoint we run far too many guys deep and throw it up. The problem with that is we have no receiver on the team that can get pre-throw separation consistently.

We get into far too many 3rd and longs from poor playcalling.

I get that Sloan is a big time recruiter of Underwood, but I don’t see him being a long term fit for OC if he cannot find a more creative running game.

Josh Williams, as good as a kid as he is will never be it.

Kyren Lacy still has stone hands when it matters most.

Our best receiver is probably Anderson. He needs more touches.


Defensively we were fine if the offense would have held up their end of the deal and had us at 35-7 at half instead of 17-7.
This post was edited on 10/27/24 at 8:22 am
Posted by tgdk11
Member since Nov 2017
1476 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:27 am to
Yup. 1st int all nuss. He had zavion on comeback for first down, or throw away, or run. 2nd one was right read pre snap, great play by atm. 3rd play, same, was right read to dump it... as every route was 20 yds downfield and had immediate pressure at him, lb made great play reading the rb dump coming.

To your point , our scheme is predictable. Run plays seem so easy for teams to just stop, like their in a scrimmage.

And our guys have to out athlete on pass plays, Anderson, lacy, just making plays. Nuss made great throws on all of those plays too... but why don't we go back to anderson, green slants in 2nd half, throw a dedicated rb screen. If we have these amazing tackles get them in space. 3 yrs in and Kelly teams can't run a fing screen.

We can't rely on nuss throwing into 7-8 coverage when dline knows they can get there with 4. We did it all 2nd half. And last scoring drive nuss checked out of every single play call pre snap that was for a gain.
Posted by austiger
Austin
Member since Apr 2012
845 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:44 am to
No toss sweeps or end runs. It's is the same running play every time.
Posted by Circle G
Member since Dec 2020
419 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:47 am to
Never a screen to be seen either.
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
3666 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:49 am to
Our running plays woulda been better off just kneeling the football for. We aren’t going nowhere when we try.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
39608 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:50 am to
quote:

But the offense has become quite predictable.


If the players execute, then that is irrelevant.

What was called would have worked.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram