- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/29/09 at 4:33 pm to Dodd
quote:Actually I think it's a very legitimate question.
I think the answer to this question is who do you think is most dangerous and that guy should be at QB.
Some dumbasses here think that's a stupid question though...
Posted on 3/29/09 at 4:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This would be very dangerous IMO, and cause opposing defenses fits. I would still keep Shep in at the slot though.
shotgun with 2 backs (shep and scott/calhoun), 1 TE, 2 WR. or have shep in the slot as a WR
Posted on 3/29/09 at 4:36 pm to STEVED00
quote:The unknown is actually the key to the Wild X. Not knowing which weapon will get the ball is the key to the whole thing. Some people get caught up in personnel, but in reality, it's just about keeping the defense off balance. Create mismatches, and good things happen.
just love the idea of Defenses not knowing that the Wild X is happening until the slot guys goes into motion. That my friends is a defensive nightmare....
Posted on 3/29/09 at 5:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i mean shite if JJ can improve as a runner, he can run the wild-x by himself with shep as the sweep man
I still like the idea of Shep at QB spot on Wild X sometimes. The Def won't know if its a designed QB draw, the Wild X, the Option, the Bubble screen, or something totally different.
My point is that I think Shep needs to play, but I don't want it to be predictable as to what he is going to do (ie Shep at QB = Wild X like with Arky DMac at QB = Wild X)).
Posted on 3/29/09 at 5:23 pm to STEVED00
quote:
My point is that I think Shep needs to play, but I don't want it to be predictable as to what he is going to do (ie Shep at QB = Wild X like with Arky DMac at QB = Wild X)).
IF my memory is correct the 07 LSU team KNEW that DMAC was at QB and that formation gave LSU FITS! Its all about personnel.
Posted on 3/29/09 at 5:25 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
IF my memory is correct the 07 LSU team KNEW that DMAC was at QB and that formation gave LSU FITS! Its all about personnel.
Well in that game the personnel problem for LSU was Jacob Cutera
Posted on 3/29/09 at 5:27 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
Well in that game the personnel problem for LSU was Jacob Cutera
Not exactly my point, but I get it.
Posted on 3/29/09 at 5:58 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
Well in that game the personnel problem for LSU was Jacob Cutera
and Craig Steltz, and Curtis Taylor, and Danny McCray.
Posted on 3/29/09 at 6:05 pm to ForeLSU
pretty much just cutrera and mccray along with Pelini being a vag
Posted on 3/29/09 at 6:06 pm to ForeLSU
I thought our biggest problem in that game was Kirston Pittman jumping inside and letting DMac get to the outside around him.
Didn't most of the big runs go to the left?
Didn't most of the big runs go to the left?
Posted on 3/29/09 at 6:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we don't really have that super explosive speed guy that will make Ds worry about the sweep off the motion. shep is a great option for this with his speed.
Drayto Calhoun will be that guy.
Posted on 3/29/09 at 6:27 pm to OBUDan
I guess Ron Brooks has assured us that DC will be playing on Offense?
Posted on 3/29/09 at 6:30 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
IF my memory is correct the 07 LSU team KNEW that DMAC was at QB and that formation gave LSU FITS! Its all about personnel.
My point is that Shep most probably will be a more versatile threat. I just don't think he should be pigeon-holed into just one position.
Posted on 3/29/09 at 6:32 pm to NorfolkVATiger
quote:
Didn't most of the big runs go to the left?
Yes but that was more because of Jones coming in motion from that side. If Jones would've come in motion from the other side then that DE would've been more vulnerable.
Posted on 3/29/09 at 6:44 pm to STEVED00
quote:
Yes but that was more because of Jones coming in motion from that side. If Jones would've come in motion from the other side then that DE would've been more vulnerable.
Except that Tyson Jackson played extremely good assignment football the last two years. You saw very few running plays bounce out around him, unlike the long runs to the left that happened in many games the last two years.
Tyson Jackson is going to make someone an excellent DE in a 3-4 scheme in the NFL.
Posted on 3/29/09 at 7:35 pm to NorfolkVATiger
he ran a 4.9 and had 8.5 sacks when he was allowed to rush the passer
i'm starting to think that maybe it was scheme, and he may be able to be a SDE in a 4-3 now in the NFL
i'm starting to think that maybe it was scheme, and he may be able to be a SDE in a 4-3 now in the NFL
Posted on 3/29/09 at 7:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yeah Tyson's drop-off in sacks is sort of puzzling. I figured it was scheme too - he talked about being coached to maintain his responsibilities a year or two ago in explaining the lack of sacks.
The entire DL under performed last year, along with the rest of the D. I'm really looking forward to see the defense this year with an all new (and much improved) staff.
The entire DL under performed last year, along with the rest of the D. I'm really looking forward to see the defense this year with an all new (and much improved) staff.
This post was edited on 3/29/09 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 3/30/09 at 4:31 am to ForeLSU
quote:
1. The Wild Murphy
If it weren't for this play, we possibly beat Bama.
Worst play in the playbook.
We were running right down Bama's throat all game. 1st play in OT, we gain about 6 or 7 yards.
And what do we do on 2nd and 4??? Freaking Murphy in that formation and we lose about 3 yards, and that basically set up the 3rd and long INT.
Blah.
Posted on 3/30/09 at 9:26 am to TigerCut
quote:
Maxi,
Uh,... in this modern world we live in, high tech,... etc, dude if I were u, I would sleep with one eye open. 81,000+ posts??? We know who u are & will visit you very soon speaking all that shite u talk. Maxi, don't forget, will be paying u a little visit here REAL SOON!!!
Popular
Back to top



1



