- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: IF Jordan is cleared......
Posted on 8/24/11 at 12:59 pm to coachjeaux
Posted on 8/24/11 at 12:59 pm to coachjeaux
quote:
Than the "victims" have deformed JJ character therefore he can sue the victims for deformation of character.
Than (then ) the "Rant" have deformed JJ ( JJ's) character therefore ( ;therefore, ) he can sue the rant for deformation ( what ever that is ) of character.But, only those that deformed him..........
Posted on 8/24/11 at 12:59 pm to coachjeaux
quote:So attorney, then?
I don't coach
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:00 pm to Tiger in Tejas
quote:
There's laws against this
Yes there is.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:01 pm to scubafeet
quote:
He will play against Oregon, and he will show America why Les has stuck by his side for so long, and why LSU thinks the program would fold without him!.....JJ will light up Oregon's defense for 78 yards!
I love how you think there scuba, my fellow Lake Chucket. I wish we could just go back to talking about opening day of duck season (September 3, Dallas, one day only, no limit) and leave this beaten down topic alone.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:02 pm to coachjeaux
quote:
IF Jordan is cleared......
quote:
There's laws against this
Yes there is.
Brah, he was being sarcastic
Deform- distort the shape, size or property of an object.
Defame- to use slander to tarnish ones name
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:02 pm to NaturalBeam
No not an attorney just have like five lawyer mentors and I work for the government.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:03 pm to Jumbeauxlaya
quote:
Charges HAVE been filed.. which sgt don stone has repeatedly told us..
I believe Sgt Stone misspoke, no charges have been filed; only a complaint has been filed by the alleged victims and I use the word victims reluctantly
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:03 pm to coachjeaux
quote:Well, that explains it
I work for the government
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:04 pm to K2LAW
quote:
I love how you think there scuba, my fellow Lake Chucket. I wish we could just go back to talking about opening day of duck season (September 3, Dallas, one day only, no limit) and leave this beaten down topic alone.
K2LAW I 2nd that! Been many years since I left Lake Charles but still love the place!
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:05 pm to coachjeaux
quote:
He could file a civil suit for defermation of character and this would end up costing the "victims" and not the players
In order to file a defamation suit, Jefferson would have to prove that someone published (and in this context, "publish" has a broader meaning than its typical usage) an erroneous factual statement about him that damaged his general reputation in the community. Typically, in a defamation lawsuit, truth is an affirmative defense, but where the plaintiff is a public figure (and the QB of LSU may qualify as such), the plaintiff has to demonstrate "NY Times v Sullivan malice," meaning that he has to show the speaker knew the falsity of the statement or showed reckless disregard with respect to its truth or falsity. Finally, certain statements (like good faith statements to investigating police officers) are privileged under the law of many jurisdictions and cannot form the basis for a defamation suit.
Ignore the details. The point of all of this rambling is that it would be difficult for the players to sue for defamation and recover damages. Moreover, they likely would not want to expose themselves to discovery and a trial which would revolve around the very events they are trying to put behind them. Just my opinion.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:07 pm to coachjeaux
quote:
I work for the government.
OOOOHHHHHH
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:09 pm to coachjeaux
quote:
I work for the government.
Ahh, It's all making sense now. Typical government worker. You have 5 people advising you toward the wrong conclusion. All you needed was a dictionary.
Btw, its defamation
LINK
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:09 pm to coachjeaux
quote:I have read some crazy shite on this board but your post wins the grand prize for stupidity.
Tiger Rant - Reply
Subject
Message
Markup
Emoticons
More Emoticons
You are replying to the following post:
Posted by Message
coachjeaux
IF Jordan is cleared......
He could file a civil suit for defermation of character and this would end up costing the "victims" and not the players
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:20 pm to coachjeaux
should have been a comedian, I guess.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:21 pm to coachjeaux
quote:Anyone can sue anyone for anything. It would be virtually impossible for JJ to obtain a judgment.
He could file a civil suit for defermation of character and this would end up costing the "victims" and not the players
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:21 pm to coachjeaux
quote:Has anybody make a joke about defermentation?
He could file a civil suit for defermation of character and this would end up costing the "victims" and not the players
Cause it happened at a bar?
And the participants were drunk?
Anybody make a joke about that yet. You know, fermentation . . . defermentation?
No . . . Nobody?
Okay, nevermind.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 1:24 pm to coachjeaux
quote:
He could file a civil suit for defermation of character and this would end up costing the "victims" and not the players
I think you just defamed the English language.
But seriously, I don't think there is any basis for JJ to claim defamation. No charges have been filed. The "victims" aren't going directly to the media and making any public claims about what happened.
All parties are lawyered up and working with the police. The only parties that could be accused of defamation are the dozens of people claiming what they saw on talk radio, the Internet, etc. Highly unlikely they'll be called to account for anything they said that wasn't true.
Methinks this is just wishful thinking on your part.
Popular
Back to top

0






