- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/14/10 at 11:21 pm to Lester Earl
tack was the rated behind chris paul coming out of high school. he was a head case but a very likeable kid. he had his moments he just would go braindead sometimes. ive never seen anyone dribble a ball up the floor faster, just crazy sometimes. tack would destroy bo spencer
Posted on 1/14/10 at 11:27 pm to cjf33
tac's niche was being THE guy on the team. we played them in a thanksgiving classic and he just couldnt be stopped, still had a moment or two where he'd trip over himself but he just couldnt integrate into the team and be a play maker/distributor. his outside shot being so streaky didn't help either.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 11:59 pm to S
Terry Martin vs. Tack
would be a score-athon
Terry would shoot 3's 1 sec into in the possession over tack and tack would drive right around his lazy arse
would be a score-athon
Terry would shoot 3's 1 sec into in the possession over tack and tack would drive right around his lazy arse
Posted on 1/15/10 at 2:39 am to ashank3
quote:
And the fact that Tack never averaged a lot of points anyway
So Tack split time his Freshman year and came off the bench. In his one year starting, our starters consisted of Darrel Mitchell, Brandon Bass, Glen Davis, and Antonio Hudson.
It's amazing some people hate on Tack so much. He averaged like 10 points and 5 assists that year. He is simply remembered for his UAB game. Tack had a couple of plays a game where people were like "wtf?". However, when he was "on", he was a top 10 PG in the country. The guy was strong as an ox, very quick, and had excellent range (although it was very streaky at times).
Bo and Tack shouldn't even be mentioned in the same category. Tack would destroy Bo in a one-on-one.
Posted on 1/15/10 at 6:21 am to LSUButt
Dribble, dribble, turnover...
...act like an arse!
...act like an arse!
Posted on 1/15/10 at 10:44 am to S
quote:
tac would then move on to the finals where in which he would succumb to terry martin..
Posted on 1/16/10 at 10:21 am to LSUGrad9295
In a game to 20....Tack with 14 turnovers, Spencer 11.
Tack 7-35...3-13 from three point land for 17 points.
Spencer 9-34...2-11 from three point land for 20 points and the victory.
It would be heaven for both though as neither would have to pass.
Tack 7-35...3-13 from three point land for 17 points.
Spencer 9-34...2-11 from three point land for 20 points and the victory.
It would be heaven for both though as neither would have to pass.
Posted on 1/16/10 at 10:33 am to Tiger Ugly
The rims would have to be changed at half time due to all the clanking from the bricks. 
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:09 am to S
quote:
regis koundjia
How bout Kounja vs. Flava-Flav himself Dameon Mason. They'd never get to 20.
Posted on 1/16/10 at 11:17 am to Tiger Ugly
mase would at least win the beauty contest portion with his medium high socks and the headband
Posted on 1/16/10 at 12:12 pm to LSUGrad9295
Bo would win.
Tack would be too high to play.
Tack would be too high to play.
Posted on 1/16/10 at 1:32 pm to LSUGrad9295
the score would be zero to zero....they would turn it over the whole game
Posted on 1/16/10 at 2:04 pm to SOCAL TIGER
quote:
the score would be zero to zero....they would turn it over the whole game
You are forgetting, neither have much of an interest in playing defense.
Sure Spencer would dribble off his toe and do that running baseline fallaway he keeps shooting but has yet to make this year.
And Tack would blow by Spence only to dribble off his thigh and heal several times or throw a layup over the backboard.
But eventually bad defense would lead to some banked in threes and some layups.
Back to top

1






