- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/2/12 at 12:55 pm to dukke v
quote:Yes, they were better for me because it was a great season that culminated in a title and great moments in LSU football history.
But if they DON'T, You are gonna say the 2007 team was better JUST cause they won a TITLE?????
quote:I don't disagree, that's not my argument
I could care less about stats. This 2011 team would CRUSH the 2007 team . Sorry its true.
quote:But yet you continually jump the shark by making arguments that I'm not making. We were comparing the 2006 to the 2007 team, in my mind the 2007 team was better because they won it all, the 2006 team had no championships, Jamarcus Russell also had no championships. You took that argument and translated it to the 2011 team. If the 2011 team wins it all they will no doubt be the best team.
I have NOT given even 1 stat this whole thread.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 12:56 pm to Spirit of Dunson
quote:No, it's all opinion. There will never be anything definitive.
Did we ever get a definitive ruling as to who is better?
Posted on 1/2/12 at 12:56 pm to Billder
quote:I won almost every major point.
While I commend your effort, you are losing the argument.

Posted on 1/2/12 at 12:56 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:damn. 15 pages.
No, it's all opinion. There will never be anything definitive.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 12:57 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
No, it's all opinion. There will never be anything definitive.
THERE YA GO!!!!!


Posted on 1/2/12 at 12:59 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:that's opinion, not definitive.
I won almost every major point
Posted on 1/2/12 at 1:05 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
You are gonna say the 2007 team was better JUST cause they won a TITLE?????
quote:
Yes, they were better for me because it was a great season that culminated in a title and great moments in LSU football history.
Analytical reasoning at it's finest, folks.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 1:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
2005 USC v. 2011 LSU
Do you mean 2004 USC that won the title in 2005?
That's a Tough one.
2004 USC was dominant but didn't play a defense anywhere near the caliber of 2011 LSU.
This post was edited on 1/2/12 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 1/2/12 at 1:37 pm to Antonio Moss
no 2005 that didn't, but had the best offense ever
Posted on 1/2/12 at 1:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
no 2005 that didn't, but had the best offense ever
Tough call again.
I would have loved to see one of those teams play a defense like LSU's or Alabama's this season.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 1:45 pm to Rittdog
I'm not reading this shite. Yeah MF is better on 1/1/12. Between 2005 and 2006 JR was the better QB and was rightfully the starter.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 1:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
2005 USC v. 2011 LSU
No WAY. LSU has WAY more SPEED and abilty to make things happen on Special teams. Lienart would be out by the 2nd quarter. LSU would run for 400 yds on that usc team.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 2:02 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
I would have loved to see one of those teams play a defense like LSU's or Alabama's this season.
me too
that's why it's an interesting debate (esp if LSU wins it all, while USC didn't)
Posted on 1/2/12 at 2:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Though I'm sure many non LSU fans would call me a homer, I feel that this year's LSU team is right there with 01' Miami as the best team of the BCS era. Not saying that we have the same amount of players that will end up in the NFL as they did, just comparing the teams against one another. LSU has actually been more dominant on a consistent basis than that Miami team was.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 2:21 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
I think there is a simple point that is missed amid all of the name calling and revisionist history. And that point is simply that there were many of us who recognized Matt Flynn was a superior quarterback way back in the day, and argued that he should have been the starter -- yes, the starter -- over JR. And now that they have both had the opportunity to show what they can do, Matt Flynn has proven himself to be the better QB. So yes, there is a degree of vindication there.
The same group of folks who are trying to tell us that Matt Flynn might be better today but JR was better in college and deserved to be the starter back then were the same ones who pointed to his projected draft status and the comments of everyone who told us what a superstar JR was and how well he would do in the NFL -- coaches, pro scouts, etc. -- let's call them the conventional wisdom. Well, the conventional wisdom was flat out wrong. JR was a total bust in the NFL. You see, it's hard to accept the criticism of the conventional wisdom when they were wrong, and we were right.
JR was a tremendous physical talent. I really don't know anything about his mental prowess, except to say that he seemed to make quite a few bad decisions that placed LSU at a disadvantage and then required some fourth quarter heroics to win the game. Sometimes he was able to deliver those heroics, sometimes not. I do think that he improved over time and actually made fewer errors in 2006 than he made in 2005. And he did lead LSU to several successful seasons, and he should be applauded for that. Whether he could have lead LSU to a National Championship in 2007 is largely a matter of speculation, and is little better than trying to project what LSU might have done with MF at qb in 2005 and 2006 instead of JR.
For that reason, I really don't care to engage in arguments or discussions about why JR failed, or why he was a better college qb but didn't make it in the pros. They're excuses, really.
The bottom line is Matt Flynn was and is a winner. Call it work ethic, smarts, leadership, whatever, I don't care. He represents the university with dignity and class. He's a class act all the way around.
The same group of folks who are trying to tell us that Matt Flynn might be better today but JR was better in college and deserved to be the starter back then were the same ones who pointed to his projected draft status and the comments of everyone who told us what a superstar JR was and how well he would do in the NFL -- coaches, pro scouts, etc. -- let's call them the conventional wisdom. Well, the conventional wisdom was flat out wrong. JR was a total bust in the NFL. You see, it's hard to accept the criticism of the conventional wisdom when they were wrong, and we were right.
JR was a tremendous physical talent. I really don't know anything about his mental prowess, except to say that he seemed to make quite a few bad decisions that placed LSU at a disadvantage and then required some fourth quarter heroics to win the game. Sometimes he was able to deliver those heroics, sometimes not. I do think that he improved over time and actually made fewer errors in 2006 than he made in 2005. And he did lead LSU to several successful seasons, and he should be applauded for that. Whether he could have lead LSU to a National Championship in 2007 is largely a matter of speculation, and is little better than trying to project what LSU might have done with MF at qb in 2005 and 2006 instead of JR.
For that reason, I really don't care to engage in arguments or discussions about why JR failed, or why he was a better college qb but didn't make it in the pros. They're excuses, really.
The bottom line is Matt Flynn was and is a winner. Call it work ethic, smarts, leadership, whatever, I don't care. He represents the university with dignity and class. He's a class act all the way around.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 2:25 pm to dukke v
quote:
2007 team was better JUST cause they won a TITLE?????
this is the problem with giving every loser a trophy in t-ball. People like you think something less than #1 is a victory.
There is #1, and then #2 is the FIRST loser. Everyone after that is still a loser in comparison.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 2:33 pm to c on z
You are wrong again. Flynn was always better than Russell. Miles made a promised Russell he would start if he would commit to LSU. Who won the national title?
Posted on 1/2/12 at 2:33 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
quote:
this has, literally, nothing to do with comparing the 2 in college
the OP's original assertion was using yesterday's performance by Flynn as a final measuring stick. I agree with him.
You're unbeleivable. The OPs assertion was that Fynn was the better QB after all. Meaning he was better than JR in college and should have been starting. You go on to spend several pages aruging this.
quote:
quote:
I guess Matt Flynn was better than JaMarcus Russell after all
I said it several times for a few years and was raked over the coals relentlessly.
You then joined DP40 in asserting that Jimbo made up all that shite he said about Jmarc's football intelligence and work ethic and disregarded the predraft reports that said the same. All to support your argument that Flynn was the better QB.
You've cast aside every objective measuring stick of the two while at LSU and keep repeating the same BS about leadership.
quote:
I wasnt wrong, because I defined "good" not as "raw talent", but good as in understanding how to play the game, be a leader and make those around you better.
Then when its pointed out how bad Flynn performed against teams well below LSU's talent level which should have cost them a chance at the title, saved by a miracle ending, you casually take any blame away from dear leader Matt Flynn and place it on others. Apparently Flynn makes everyone around him so much better except when playing shite teams with NC title hopes on the line.
When its pointed out that Flynn almost botched the Auburn ending, you stick to the script with the ridiculous accusation that it was Miles fault for not calling a TO. Do you really think LSU was planning on calling their last TO on 3rd down with 20 seconds left? As opposed to running a play on 3rd down and in case it didnt go for a TD call a TO then?
Now that you realize how dumb it is to claim Flynn was better than JR while at LSU, you crawfish hard and claim that you are only arguing that Flynn's performance shows that ultimately he became the better QB.
quote:
quote:
this has, literally, nothing to do with comparing the 2 in college
the OP's original assertion was using yesterday's performance by Flynn as a final measuring stick. I agree with him.
quote:
I won almost every major point


This post was edited on 1/2/12 at 2:44 pm
Popular
Back to top
