- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/10/17 at 6:20 pm to BUGAtGOAT
quote:
How would we have faired vs Clemson?
We will never know because we can't win the games necessary to get to the CFP.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 6:20 pm to prepsportsallday
quote:
we lost to florida. so...
And we stomped Louisville and contained bama much better than Clemson so....
Quit being a pussy
Posted on 1/10/17 at 6:42 pm to BUGAtGOAT
Depends on when we played them during the season. Catch them during an off (Pittsburgh) week and us on an on (Louisville) week - who knows.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 8:02 pm to BUGAtGOAT
quote:
How would we have faired vs. Clemson?
faired
I'm not sure. Maybe with some Cajun food, a dunking booth, perhaps some face painting for the kids.
Now, as to how we would have fared against them, that's another matter.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 8:10 pm to prepsportsallday
And Clemson lost to PITT!
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:16 am to BUGAtGOAT
I completely see where people are coming from in saying Clemson would have the edge by 3-7 pts. I also see where they say Clemson D would be tough for Guice, BUT:
Keep in mind Scarbrough got hurt. If he stays healthy and they keep pounding the ball. I am not sure that Clemson gets that last 2 minute drive in.
With that being said I think it would be a 3-7pt game and could go either way. Hurts was no better than Etling would have been (substitute Hurts scrambling plays for Danny being able to throw the 7yd slant route Hurts kept missing).
Keep in mind Scarbrough got hurt. If he stays healthy and they keep pounding the ball. I am not sure that Clemson gets that last 2 minute drive in.
With that being said I think it would be a 3-7pt game and could go either way. Hurts was no better than Etling would have been (substitute Hurts scrambling plays for Danny being able to throw the 7yd slant route Hurts kept missing).
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:26 am to BUGAtGOAT
We finished 8-4
They beat us 38-13
They beat us 38-13
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:29 am to Billy Mays Here
quote:
I think we could beat Ohio State, Clemson, and Washington.
quote:
And then turn around and lose to Bama. It's in our coaches' heads at this point.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:50 am to BUGAtGOAT
Our defense keeps us in any game we play.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:52 am to TigerinDunbarton
quote:They are 14-1 and National Champs
If Clemson can't beat Pitt....you are so fkn stupid...you really are
We are 8-4 and Citrus Bowl champs
You are the fkn stupid one
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:54 am to BUGAtGOAT
Their defense would have contained our QB play.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:13 am to BUGAtGOAT
I think it would look a lot like the LSU - Bama game did this year.
Low scoring, LSU close loss.
Low scoring, LSU close loss.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:23 am to BUGAtGOAT
Not convinced Etling would have had any success. 17-7.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:33 am to Space Cowboy
quote:
Florida didn't beat us. We gave them that game.
Loser talk. 100% loser talk.
Better get use to rolling that statement out.
"we gave them that game" The New LSU Mantra
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:41 am to BUGAtGOAT
Our best vs Clemson in title game rhythm, we lose. Their receivers would have lit us up. Watson was making great passes, and for the "but Tre White ..." argument, they had 3 guys going off. White can't cover them all. He'd have a hard time containing Williams.
Popular
Back to top
