- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many quarters would it take for LSU to score 60 points
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:56 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
likely UO/OU title with what i'd guess is a 33% shot at LSu/AU getting in over OU
that would depend on the voters
Man, no way an SEC team gets left out if they go undefeated this year. Not with the schedule the computers would get them in I think.
1
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:57 am to Palm Beach Tiger
what about a 1 loss SEC team? I would think a unbeaten SEC team would be a lock.
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 11:59 am
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:59 am to SlowFlowPro
You do realize Oregon runs the mother of all hurry-up offenses? They average a snap every 15 seconds of game clock. LSU with it's ground game will *never* average that.
The result is that Oregon games feature a helluva lot more plays, therefore, more points. They run about the same number of plays in a half that most teams (including LSU) runs in a full game.
Bearing that in mind, it will require more than just 8 quarters for LSU to hit 60. I'm thinking 12 or so.
The result is that Oregon games feature a helluva lot more plays, therefore, more points. They run about the same number of plays in a half that most teams (including LSU) runs in a full game.
Bearing that in mind, it will require more than just 8 quarters for LSU to hit 60. I'm thinking 12 or so.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How many quarters would it take for LSU to score 60 points
1 more than it would take to score 60 points on Stanford.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 11:59 am to tubucoco
quote:
what about a 1 loss SEC team?
well, if OU and UO are undefeated we wouldn't have a shot in that case.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 12:01 pm to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:
what about a 1 loss SEC team?
well, if OU and UO are undefeated we wouldn't have a shot in that case.
Nor should we. Boise St. or TCU is a different story.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 12:06 pm to tubucoco
How about this 5 out of 12 BCS champs have scored 60 during their CC year.
AND only 9 times in 12 years has the eventual champ scored 60 or more in any game. So it has no positive correlation on winning it all.
But I know you can't process information so please don't respond to me. Anyone that refuses to acknowledge a printed rule because he doesn't agree with it is lost.
AND only 9 times in 12 years has the eventual champ scored 60 or more in any game. So it has no positive correlation on winning it all.
But I know you can't process information so please don't respond to me. Anyone that refuses to acknowledge a printed rule because he doesn't agree with it is lost.
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 10/22/10 at 12:09 pm to Jaydeaux
on average we're bringing in 60 points every 10 quarters against decent teams. with just jj behind center it would take us somewhere in the neighborhood of 25-30 quarters. 
Posted on 10/22/10 at 12:29 pm to Jaydeaux
your the one that is lost because you can't understand something as simple as a ball bouncing forward past the point where it struck and the person catching it then would be considered an illegal forward lateral.
You just don't get it, and you keep sayin I don't understand the rule, oh I understand, but why the hell do you think they were taking so long on the review clown, if Jasper had caught it past the point where it struck it would be illegal, but you are right I'm tired of tryin to explain this, so you won't have worry about me responding to you!
You just don't get it, and you keep sayin I don't understand the rule, oh I understand, but why the hell do you think they were taking so long on the review clown, if Jasper had caught it past the point where it struck it would be illegal, but you are right I'm tired of tryin to explain this, so you won't have worry about me responding to you!
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 10/22/10 at 12:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
likely UO/OU title with what i'd guess is a 33% shot at LSu/AU getting in over OU
Probably a better chance of LSU getting in over Oregon, since Oklahoma will probably be higher in the computers
Posted on 10/22/10 at 12:53 pm to tubucoco
Dude, do you need me to post the rule again and embarass you in yet another thread? I'd be happy to. Again, you can't read and I feel bad for you for that.
If you have something that contradicts the rule I posted please do it. If not please STFU and die.
If you have something that contradicts the rule I posted please do it. If not please STFU and die.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:04 pm to Jaydeaux
dummy, you can't comprehend that if he catches the ball pass the point it sruck, IT' NO frickIN GOOD, ILLEGAL!
you are omly making an arse of yourself not me, I keep tellin you they were trying to determine where he caught the ball after it struck the ground which was basically right in line with where the holder was, parallel to him, but if he had caught it past that point it would be no good, and I am not going to keep arguing about this shite because you ae ridiculous, and a clown that managed to dupe other clowns into believeing it would be legal wherever he caught it!
I wish it would have bounced all the way up to line of scrimmage where the Olinemen were and Jasper had caught it then, you would probably still be arguing that was legal! 
what an frickIN IDIOT!
you are omly making an arse of yourself not me, I keep tellin you they were trying to determine where he caught the ball after it struck the ground which was basically right in line with where the holder was, parallel to him, but if he had caught it past that point it would be no good, and I am not going to keep arguing about this shite because you ae ridiculous, and a clown that managed to dupe other clowns into believeing it would be legal wherever he caught it!
I wish it would have bounced all the way up to line of scrimmage where the Olinemen were and Jasper had caught it then, you would probably still be arguing that was legal!
what an frickIN IDIOT!
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:13 pm to tubucoco
quote:
dummy, you can't comprehend that if he catches the ball pass the point it sruck, IT' NO frickIN GOOD, ILLEGAL!
What can i say, you're wrong. I'll repost the rule again. Maybe this time you'll understand.
AND, rule 2.19.2a makes the following distinction between a forward and backward pass:
“A forward pass is determined by the point where the ball first strikes the ground, a player, an official or anything beyond the spot of the pass. All other passes are backward passes.” Also, in regards to the ball bouncing, it can because it’s a backward pass. It remains alive.
Please try to understand that it doesn't matter where it goes after that. It's a "backward pass" and can be picked up and advanced. That's all from the rule book not me. I really am starting to feel sorry for you.
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
That isn't "LSU football" under Les Miles.
You can write a 16 million dollar check if you want LSU to score 60 points.
You can write a 16 million dollar check if you want LSU to score 60 points.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:33 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
You don't get more than one W no matter how many points you score. What you do get is hacks thinking it actually means something.
And entertained fans, but I know that Miles and his minions don't think that football should be entertaining.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 1:37 pm to uway
quote:
And entertained fans, but I know that Miles and his minions don't think that football should be entertaining.
It has nothing to do with Miles. Did you see the facts I posted about scoring 60 points?
It doesn't mean a thing. That's why I love the SEC and not the Pac 10. It's hard to argue with sucess (BCS CC) but I'm sure you'll find a way.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 2:00 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
Did you see the facts I posted about scoring 60 points?
You mean this gem?
quote:
So it has no positive correlation on winning it all
Scoring a lot of points is not correlated to winning.
quote:
It doesn't mean a thing
It does to people who like to see their team functioning at a high level, which for this LSU team would mean scoring a lot of points, given how many top-notch athletes your guru has recruited.
Top-notch athletes + poor production = great coaching. Right?
Posted on 10/22/10 at 2:09 pm to Jaydeaux
read your rule you posted DUMMY, you have a mental block or something I swear! Besides it wasn't a pass it was lateral I keep tellin you arse, and if it hits the ground like your rule just stated bouncing(and this is the key your brain can't comprehend) behind or parallel to the holder than it is considered legal!
but if bounces forward, it is illegal, jeez, I'm tired of this shite, you posted a rule you don't even understand, move on man, back to the topic at hand!
but if bounces forward, it is illegal, jeez, I'm tired of this shite, you posted a rule you don't even understand, move on man, back to the topic at hand!
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 10/22/10 at 2:13 pm to uway
Seeing them scoring at a high level means they are performing up to their expectations and coaching has a lot to do with that, there is no way a team like LSU should be struggling with a McNeese St., so I agree with you!
Posted on 10/22/10 at 2:47 pm to tubucoco
No, it is determind backward or forward by where it hits numbnuts. frick please learn to read
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News