- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many quarters would it take for LSU to score 60 points
Posted on 10/22/10 at 9:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/22/10 at 9:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Didn't UCLA have 3 losses already? Granted they are a bcs team... They still suck
Posted on 10/22/10 at 9:34 am to SlowFlowPro
if LSU were to hypothetically play oregon in a bowl game they'd score around 24...fact
defense wins championships...we just need our offense to be better than below average
defense wins championships...we just need our offense to be better than below average
Posted on 10/22/10 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
I get the LSU-Oregon connection here.
It would be phenomenal to see some of that offense with a defense.
Of course, you would then have to subject that offense to the rest of this conferences personnel and coordinators, week in and week out.
I think they're the class of the PAC-10, but if Stanford and Arizona are the big boys you're going to put up to challenge the top of the SEC, it just ain't happening.
It would be phenomenal to see some of that offense with a defense.
Of course, you would then have to subject that offense to the rest of this conferences personnel and coordinators, week in and week out.
I think they're the class of the PAC-10, but if Stanford and Arizona are the big boys you're going to put up to challenge the top of the SEC, it just ain't happening.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 9:53 am to LSUBrown
quote:
Saban passed on Pat White as a QB
only a very small # of schools were running the spread option at that time, and only one offered him at QB
quote:
ame thing as Miles with the Oregon QB.
CFB was a lot different at that point
Posted on 10/22/10 at 9:57 am to wahoocs
stanford is pretty good this year. physical team, great coaching, and a stud QB
who in the SEC is amazing this year?
AU? no D
LSU? no O
Bama? 1-dimensional offense and a shaky secondary
Arky? shite D and no running game
the east is not good this year
who in the SEC is amazing this year?
AU? no D
LSU? no O
Bama? 1-dimensional offense and a shaky secondary
Arky? shite D and no running game
the east is not good this year
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:16 am to SlowFlowPro
One reason I started to get more and more excited about this season's propects after the UF game is that I have believed since the early weeks of the season that this is a down year in the SEC. it is the kind of year that could allow a good buy flawed team to go undefeated.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:18 am to Bubba Hotep
quote:
However, watching Oregon go for it on 4th and 6 on their side of the field on the opening drive of the game makes me wonder about Chip Kelly. I like them, but I don't like a lot of things about them. I much prefer a pro-style offense. These gimmicks usually are figured out.
Les has made his name on much bigger "gimmicks" than that.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:60. We only average one score per quarter. Les Miles Big Ten football rocks!
How many quarters would it take for LSU to score 60 points
against a 1AA opponent?
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:20 am to RBWilliams8
quote:We struggle to score 24 against fruckin McNeese and Troy.
Didn't UCLA have 3 losses already? Granted they are a bcs team... They still suck
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:22 am to SlowFlowPro
...what if this, what if that . What if if if if .. what if we had this guy ... what if we had that guy ... if only we had this coach, no, if we had that coach ... if we this, if we that ... if if if if .. weakest post thread type EVER .. go back into hiding .. 
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:24 am to CajunFootball
quote:
i'm asking b/c UO scored 60 last night against a BCS program
Dude if you think Oregon could score 60 on the Tigers your sick. That hurry up shite might work a third of the time against our D. I guarantee we would have caused at least 4 turnovers when Oregon is jumping around and playing grass basketball.
We won't have to score more than 35 points against any team. Including Auburn this weekend. Bet
This post was edited on 10/22/10 at 10:25 am
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Bama? 1-dimensional offense and a shaky secondary
bama is top 10 in qb rating and yds/att
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
UTenn-UO: 48-13
UTenn-LSU: 16-14
for reference
Florida over Tenn 31-17
LSU over Tenn 16-14
LSU over Florida 33-29
Guess each match up plays out differently. By your definition clearly LSU should have lost to Florida right? Guess you will have to come up with something else.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:25 am to TallTex
quote:
i'm asking b/c UO scored 60 last night against a BCS program
Dude if you think Oregon could score 60 on the Tigers your sick.
Where are you getting this out of that point?
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:36 am to SlowFlowPro
It would probably take LSU 2 games + the first quarter of a third to get to 60, especially with Mile's idiotic QB rotation.
That said, watching the Ducks lst night, I couldn't help but think that they look an awful lot like WVU, just maybe a little faster.
I think if things played out right and we met for the NC, our D would dismantle their offense, especially with a month to prep.
On the flipside, they could play 8 guys on defense and I don't know if we could score more that 10 points on offense against them...unless our QB rotation changed.
That said, watching the Ducks lst night, I couldn't help but think that they look an awful lot like WVU, just maybe a little faster.
I think if things played out right and we met for the NC, our D would dismantle their offense, especially with a month to prep.
On the flipside, they could play 8 guys on defense and I don't know if we could score more that 10 points on offense against them...unless our QB rotation changed.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:41 am to memphis tiger
they run a similar offense to WV, but more running-based and with faster players
UO has a big edge at the QB position
UO has a big edge at the QB position
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they run a similar offense to WV, but more running-based and with faster players
True, but do you disagree that with a month to prep LSU would shut them down.
I really think theat if UO and LSU played, and LSU didn't give them a short fieldd to work with, they would be hard pressed to score 3 TDs against the tiger D.
Also, I still think that may be enough for them to win.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:44 am to Bubba Hotep
quote:
These gimmicks usually are figured out.
By "gimmick" do you mean a borderline understanding of creating mismatches in the secondary and LB core?
By "gimmick" do you mean not trying to force an offense that is ineffective and not suited for one's personnel?
By "gimmick" do you mean creating an offensive scheme tailored around getting the ball to skill players instead of forcing plays for the sake of running them?
If so, I wish we had an offensive coordinator who knew how to run a "gimmick" offense.
Posted on 10/22/10 at 10:46 am to memphis tiger
quote:
but do you disagree that with a month to prep LSU would shut them down.
i'll tell you what i think about that after we play AU (who also is a spread option team)
Popular
Back to top


1






