- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How Do You Explain Crowton's Demise?
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:18 pm to AlwysATgr
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:18 pm to AlwysATgr
I believe there are a wide varieties of reasons as to why Crowton's offense at LSU and just about everywhere he's coached has steadily gotten worse.
LSU specific it does include lack of an experienced QB and a weak OLine. But that's not the end all.
Crowton's offense doesn't have a backbone, a bread and butter play, an identity - name it what you want.
He tries to do to much and always has. The offense itself isn't confusing, he confuses it. Most good coaches see their strengths and weaknesses and attempt to highlight their strengths and mask their weaknesses. It seems much of the time Crowton does the opposite. I do not think he intentionally ignores his strengths and plays to his weaknesses, but it's what you get when you coach without a set desire of what you are going to make the opposing defense stop.
It's very noticeable in his play calling and the seeming lack of basics the offense displays. I think it's a flaw Crowton will not be able to overcome. He has shown no willingness to develop an offense to its strength and then make adjustments when needed besides his early tenure at programs. In fact, he has shown the desire to only make adjustments against what is working.
Teams can run a limited selection of plays and be successful. It doesn't have to be rocket science. In this case Crowton is easily his own worst enemy.
LSU specific it does include lack of an experienced QB and a weak OLine. But that's not the end all.
Crowton's offense doesn't have a backbone, a bread and butter play, an identity - name it what you want.
He tries to do to much and always has. The offense itself isn't confusing, he confuses it. Most good coaches see their strengths and weaknesses and attempt to highlight their strengths and mask their weaknesses. It seems much of the time Crowton does the opposite. I do not think he intentionally ignores his strengths and plays to his weaknesses, but it's what you get when you coach without a set desire of what you are going to make the opposing defense stop.
It's very noticeable in his play calling and the seeming lack of basics the offense displays. I think it's a flaw Crowton will not be able to overcome. He has shown no willingness to develop an offense to its strength and then make adjustments when needed besides his early tenure at programs. In fact, he has shown the desire to only make adjustments against what is working.
Teams can run a limited selection of plays and be successful. It doesn't have to be rocket science. In this case Crowton is easily his own worst enemy.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:25 pm to supatigah
quote:
a non-factor, we don't run enough option for it to be a factor
False. Every time we run a play that we have a strong idea that will not be successful it is a factor. Plays that continually do not work are usually sectioned off to the "do not run" section of the playbook - at least temporarily.
quote:
As for as Crowton's demise...I see people saying "he does this, he doesn't do that" but no one ever says what the defense is doing in reaction to LSU.
LSU's offense doesn't really attempt to make the defense stop any particular plays or schemes. We try to make them stop everything. This may sound good in theory, but it's flawed in that LSU never sets the tone for a defense to sell out to stop anything. We usually end up stopping ourselves by trying to do too much instead of making the defense stop what is working for us.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:33 pm to OFWHAP
quote:
Why does everyone assume that RP would have behaved had he stayed at LSU? He was still getting in trouble as recently as this season with his suspension at Jacksonville State during the first game. How do we know that he wouldn't still be getting in bar fights, getting involved with counterfeit money, etc.?
Obviously the statement that RP would have significantly enhanced the LSU offense is based on the assumption that he actually played every game. In other words, stayed relatively trouble-free as he has in Alabama and injury-free. So there. Had he stayed, become the good scout, and played up to his capabilities for two years, LSU would likely have won at least four and possibly five of the games that they have lost. He's that good. Crowton and Miles' inability to taylor a successful game plan for younger, less competant qb's has led to these types of threads and feelings of frustration.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:56 pm to RANDY44
Obviously the statement that RP would have significantly enhanced the LSU offense is based on the assumption that he actually played every game. In other words, stayed relatively trouble-free as he has in Alabama and injury-free. So there. Had he stayed, become the good scout, and played up to his capabilities for two years, LSU would likely have won at least four and possibly five of the games that they have lost. He's that good. Crowton and Miles' inability to taylor a successful game plan for younger, less competant qb's has led to these types of threads and feelings of frustration.
I totally agree
I totally agree
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:59 pm to AlwysATgr
How do you explain USC's demise?
Brad Budde: Matt Barkley’s First Adversity
USC’s Brade Budde thinks USC needs to find a way to build Matt Barkley’s confidence after a blowout loss to Stanford.
Unfortunately, I wasn’t surprised with last week’s result. When you look at USC recently, we’re struggling with confidence.
Confidence is a byproduct of successful behavior. Here, you have a quarterback who was borne into confidence at the high school level. So of course he’s going to be confident because he’s never experienced on-field adversity. But now he is. Your emotion isn’t going to save you in this instance, especially for Matt Barkley. It’s your problem-solving capabilities.
If you’re asking me what should be the focus, it’s that they need to get this young quarterback to be able to problem solve. Last week, he had three picks and a fumble. When things are difficult and it seems to be getting worse, you have to simplify things and go back to the fundamentals. As he becomes successful, then you can add more to his plate. But this is too much.
They just haven’t established an offensive identity with Barkley at the helm. They don’t seem to be emphasizing the running capabilities of this team, so Barkley is going to be directly tied to the success of this team.
Something is wrong. And something needs to change. But problem solving starts with Barkley and continues throughout this team, and that needs to be changed..
College Football Hall of Famer and 1979 Lombardi Award winner, Brad Budde is currently a business performance coach for Game Day Communications in Southern California, which he owns and operates.
Petey Carroll is having a rough stretch when he lost his highly talented QB without another highly talented QB to take his place.
With Corp. and Mustain on the bench, he goes with a true freshman--wonder why.
Brad Budde: Matt Barkley’s First Adversity
USC’s Brade Budde thinks USC needs to find a way to build Matt Barkley’s confidence after a blowout loss to Stanford.
Unfortunately, I wasn’t surprised with last week’s result. When you look at USC recently, we’re struggling with confidence.
Confidence is a byproduct of successful behavior. Here, you have a quarterback who was borne into confidence at the high school level. So of course he’s going to be confident because he’s never experienced on-field adversity. But now he is. Your emotion isn’t going to save you in this instance, especially for Matt Barkley. It’s your problem-solving capabilities.
If you’re asking me what should be the focus, it’s that they need to get this young quarterback to be able to problem solve. Last week, he had three picks and a fumble. When things are difficult and it seems to be getting worse, you have to simplify things and go back to the fundamentals. As he becomes successful, then you can add more to his plate. But this is too much.
They just haven’t established an offensive identity with Barkley at the helm. They don’t seem to be emphasizing the running capabilities of this team, so Barkley is going to be directly tied to the success of this team.
Something is wrong. And something needs to change. But problem solving starts with Barkley and continues throughout this team, and that needs to be changed..
College Football Hall of Famer and 1979 Lombardi Award winner, Brad Budde is currently a business performance coach for Game Day Communications in Southern California, which he owns and operates.
Petey Carroll is having a rough stretch when he lost his highly talented QB without another highly talented QB to take his place.
With Corp. and Mustain on the bench, he goes with a true freshman--wonder why.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:05 pm to basscatarcher
RP, has nothing to do with Crowton's demise; so
the kid has been gone "2" years
What about the players, formations, packages, the overall play calling and the level of teaching the ones that are on the roster is what counts.

the kid has been gone "2" years

Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:09 pm to AlwysATgr
No offense runs without effective Oline blocking. Fix the oline and Crowton will start looking like a genius and JJ like Peyton Manning.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:30 pm to jesterJ
quote:
RP, has nothing to do with Crowton's demise; so![]()
Sanchez has nothing to do with USC's demise this year either. When you consider Pete Carroll has a 4-star junior QB (Corp) and a 5-star redshirt junior QB (Mustain) sitting on the bench.
That should sound like poor player development to a NegaTiger like you.
Wake up and smell the B.S. you are selling.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:30 pm to jesterJ
quote:
RP, has nothing to do with Crowton's demise;
So having an inexperienced, basically red shirt qb two years in a row has nothing to do with an OC's success?

Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:33 pm to Bad Cat
We aren't talking about USC. We are talking about Gary Crowton's problems.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:33 pm to Bad Cat
quote:
USC
Has nothing to do with LSU. And if you're only trying to explain Crowton by mentioning USC, then realize neither JJ or JL are true frosh this year. In fact, one of them is in his 3rd year under Crowton's teaching.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:47 pm to Bad Cat
quote:
How do you explain USC's demise?
Excellent comparison Bad Cat. I certainly wasn't shocked by what happened to the Men of Troy this season. When PC publicly whined about MS leaving early(something Miles nor Saban have ever done that I recall) it was due to his vision of what was likely to happen this season. And he was right. 'SC was outplayed in the OSU game(remember the touchdown run stopped at the one foot line)and three subsequent times. It would be hard to find anyone to say they were not the most talented team in every game they played, yet they've suffered 3 defeats and been outplayed in at least 4 games. Yet we all believe PC to be a good coach. Losing both coordinators and a QB leaving early were just too much to overcome in what is one of the top 3 conferences in America. Against LSU's schedule he would likely have suffered pretty much the same record IMO. Yet PC is revered by most as a coaching genius. Think about it. LM & PC could probably have swapped teams this year and likely the results would be much the same. Yet many make fun of Les and praise PC. So let's calm down a bit people. There are piles of worse coaches and less talented teams out there. It's time for real Tiger fans to be the voices of reason. Again, good job Bad Cat.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:47 pm to OFWHAP
quote:
We aren't talking about USC. We are talking about Gary Crowton's problems.
Point being, the best coaches in the world have do deal with off years, and you don't get rid of proven coaches because the inexperenced student athletes can't perform up to fans expectations each and every year.
Obviously, Pete Carroll hasn't been able to get his 4-star and 5-star QBs to turn on the light bulb.
According to Negatigers, that is grounds to fire somebody.

Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:48 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
I think that we can now say that the offensive schemes worked in 2007 only because Crowton didn't have enough time to do everything he wanted to do. He was only able to add in a few wrinkles, and it made the offense much better. Give him time to install his whole plan, and the offense will be a disorganized mess, no matter who the players are.
I think that is a ridiculous conclusion.
My belief is that the problems stem from 2 main sources.
1. The OL in well below average. The group is not proficient in the running game (getting a push) or the passing game (protecting the QB).
2. We have an inexperienced QB who has thus far been unable to consistently make enough plays on his own given the lack of running game and constant pressure (see # 1).
In 2007, we ran the ball for 212 yards per game...in the SEC. At any point, we could control down and distance and dictate to the defense exactly what we wanted to do. We don't have that luxury now.
This year, we are averaging 136 yards per game and are 99th in sacks allowed. We have been completely knocked off of our gameplan multiple times this year because we haven't been able to do anything with the running game or downfield in the passing game. We have been relegated to a short passing game and there is only so much success you are going to have with that.
Crowton's fate will be tied to whether or not the OLine problems can be solved. If they are solved, his offense will begin to click again.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:50 pm to moneyg
quote:
Crowton's fate will be tied to whether or not the OLine problems can be solved. If they are solved, his offense will begin to click again.
This is my guess as well.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:53 pm to moneyg
quote:
moneyg
I usually agree with you on most topics, but you are ignoring Crowton's history. Certainly LSU would be much improved with a talented senior QB and an overpowering offensive line. We don't have that, in fact most teams do not.
We've run the ball quite well at times, then inexplicably stopped doing it. Why? To teach sometype of lesson? Because we thought we might start getting stuffed? It's ridiculous.
This post was edited on 11/19/09 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:56 pm to Bad Cat
I've always thought Carroll was somewhat average. In fact he and Miles are comparable, with Carroll being in a less competitive conference. USC under Carroll has a tendency to really screw the pooch in regular season games they should win easily. With 2005 being the exception, they win big in their bowl games. Now that the Pacific Ten is becoming a more competitive conference, Pete Carroll can no longer expect to dominate on talent alone.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:57 pm to AlwysATgr
Predictability. It seems when he is gong to run, he is in a run formation, Pass the same thing. He doesn't pass from apparent running formations, and run from apparent passing formations. At least That is what I am picking up.
JJ is too slow in his pass mechanics. The CBs can see the swing passes coming, and they rarely go for anything. I keep wondering why we are constantly caught for no gain or little gain on those plays, while we get the crap knocked out of us for the same thing.
Multiple telegraphing like this going on, too many to mention. Wonder why teams like La Tech, and ULaLa had such defenses against us? Think they are just smart? No, we are just too predictable.
JJ is too slow in his pass mechanics. The CBs can see the swing passes coming, and they rarely go for anything. I keep wondering why we are constantly caught for no gain or little gain on those plays, while we get the crap knocked out of us for the same thing.
Multiple telegraphing like this going on, too many to mention. Wonder why teams like La Tech, and ULaLa had such defenses against us? Think they are just smart? No, we are just too predictable.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 4:01 pm to AlwysATgr
When a play works, such as the wildcat motion with Trindon and then the option back the other way with Perrilloux and Keiland that we ran twice against Florida in '07, we never run it again. When a play does not work, such as the regular option that we are running poorly this year, we run it over and over.It makes no sense. Another example was Deangelo Peterson vs bama. He made two big catches and they never threw to him again. He was an obvious mismatch.
He is always playing to our weaknesses.
He is always playing to our weaknesses.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 4:07 pm to Coach in Waiting
It seems that by trying to be unpredictable, Crowton becomes too predictable. If we run a play that works too many times, we need to stop before the other team figures out so we go back to our bread and butter, the option. 

Popular
Back to top
