- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Greg Brooks Jr's attorney reacts to BK rebuttal:
Posted on 2/18/25 at 10:55 am to FlyFishinTiger
Posted on 2/18/25 at 10:55 am to FlyFishinTiger
Not sure which post you were referring to but while he was definitely trained as a neurosurgeon through residency, there were more qualified surgeons to handle GBJs type of tumor. While I don't know all the specifics, I believe it has been stated that GBJ had a pediatric tumor, so a fellowship trained pediatric neurosurgeon would have been better suited for the surgery.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 10:57 am to tigerdoc8
quote:What?
that GBJ had a pediatric tumor
He in fact did not. Greg brooks was 23 years old when his tumor developed
Did he have a tumor often seen in pediatric cases? Yes. His tumor was not a “pediatric tumor”
In fact, medulloblastoma is seen 33% of the time in adults
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 11:04 am
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:51 pm to lsupride87
Sorry, I haven't been following this much at all and just thought I'd offer my opinion. But like I said I don't know all the specifics, i thought i saw something where they stated he had a pediatric or childhood developed medulloblastoma, which would incur that it had pediatric like pathology. Which is different that an adult onset MB. While there would have been no way of knowing this pre surgery, i honestly did not know that he was 23 which would suggest the adult onset. which is why i said "While I don't know all the specifics, I believe it has been stated that GBJ had a pediatric tumor, so a fellowship trained pediatric neurosurgeon would have been better suited for the surgery."
Also was he really 23, did not realize he was that old while playing at LSU?
Also was he really 23, did not realize he was that old while playing at LSU?
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:22 pm to tigerdoc8
quote:
Also was he really 23, did not realize he was that old while playing at LSU?
Birth date 8/2/01
He is 23 now. He last played in 2023 and he 22. That’s when the tumor was discovered.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 8:10 am to bass
Neurosurgeons are well trained in standard brain tumor resection. Minimally invasive surgery is a skill that can be learned as well for certain cases.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 11:32 am to tigerdoc8
quote:
Sorry, I haven't been following this much at all and just thought I'd offer my opinion. But like I said I don't know all the specifics, i thought i saw something where they stated he had a pediatric or childhood developed medulloblastoma, which would incur that it had pediatric like pathology.
The brain cancer (medulloblastoma) starts in the cerebellum which is connected to the brain stem and controls balance, coordination, and movement. The cancer begins to form abnormal cells which then creates a tumor. As the tumor grows, it can lead to various symptoms including headaches, nausea, vomiting, back pain, trouble walking, dizziness, double vision, fatigue, and clumsiness. Symptomology is similar to vertigo. A brain MRI and diagnostic testing is done to confirm diagnosis and treatment. Surgery then performed to remove tumor which is sent to pathology to determine whether it's benign (non-cancerous) or malignant (cancerous).
The exact causation is unknown yet possibly related to genetics. IMO, Brooks had developed the cancer which was unknown until neurological testing verified the current diagnosis and tumor. I don't believe LSU is liable for this health-related condition and diagnosis. The family's legal counsel will create a smear campaign that Greg's current post-operative condition is directly related to LSU, CBK, the hospital medical staff, and the neurosurgeon. Essentially sue everyone and create a belief that LSU & the Hospital are 100% responsible for Greg's current situation and his future Life Care Plan and all expenses. Experts will be brought in to testify whether Greg's condition is more probable than not related to the normal side effects from his cancer /tumor or a "misdiagnosed medical treatment and surgery gone bad".
FWIW, I've worked in the medical and vocational rehabilitation field for several decades and do Life Care Plans daily. This one could get very expensive based on Brooks' future life expectancy and medical care recommendations. Is he projected to live another 5 or 50 years? That's a crucial factor that physicians and medical experts have to opine.
Posted on 2/21/25 at 12:49 pm to Got Blaze
Curious - wouldn't Brooks have been covered by LSU's medical insurance? I thought all athletes had medical coverage from the university, but I could be wrong.
Popular
Back to top

1






