- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Game should have ended in bottom of the 9th
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:20 pm to DEANintheYAY
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:20 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
DID NOT HIT BATTER!!!
Then you are f'in blind!!!!
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:33 pm to scrimpdog
quote:
but it definitely hit him!!
no, it did not.
quote:
mute point
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbanghead.gif)
Posted on 6/23/09 at 2:04 pm to DTiger
quote:
Then you are f'in blind!!!!
When I paused it on my DVR, it definitely missed him by about 4 inches last night. It was the same when I did it in slow motion. This is also using a 50 inch HDTV, not some 20 inch POS. When I looked at it again on my DVR today, it looks like it missed him by even more. Shut up, you are stupid and don't know what you are talking about.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 2:23 pm to moneyg
What gets lost in all of this is why the hell is Coleman pitching behind a guy in the first place? Hah.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 2:25 pm to jscrims
quote:
This is also using a 50 inch HDTV, not some 20 inch POS.
Dude, the size of your TV has nothing to do with whether it hit the guy or not.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 2:28 pm to MentosTiger
Really. I watched in HD, slow motion, on a screen that belongs in a movie theater, and I thought it hit him.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 2:58 pm to jmath23lsu
CLARIFICATION: The pitch changed drastically (not a curve ball) before it it the catchers mitt. It hit the batters jersey which according to rule is part of the batter.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 2:58 pm to jscrims
Go watch it again then. The view from behind is when you can really tell it hits him. If look closely you can see the ball change directions slightly right before it hits gibbs' glove causing him to miss it.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 3:32 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
Really. I watched in HD, slow motion, on a screen that belongs in a movie theater, and I thought it hit him.
Yep, same here. I was yelling at my friends 60yr old Pennsylvanian roommate for saying it wasnt even close.
quote:
CLARIFICATION: The pitch changed drastically (not a curve ball) before it it the catchers mitt. It hit the batters jersey which according to rule is part of the batter.
Yeh, didn't that happen to an LSU player during supers and Rice flipped out because they said it hit his sleeve and not him? Douchebags...
My view, Gibbs knew where the ball was going even though the batter was blocking his sight. The dude has amazing vision. The ball changed spin after hitting the batter, which is why Gibbs didn't catch it.
Buuut...we won in cardiac cat fashion anyway
Posted on 6/23/09 at 3:33 pm to Hulk Hogan
quote:
it hit gibbs mitt
+1
Posted on 6/23/09 at 3:36 pm to athletemed
I'm gonna go with it didn't hit him and it doesn't really matter, the play is long over and we are half way to a CWS title
Posted on 6/23/09 at 3:46 pm to thepastafarian
Also, the camera angle is not directly behind the batter so that doesn't help but he definitely did not hit him.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 3:55 pm to jscrims
Well, I can agree that there isn't much point in debating one play in a game we ultimatly won.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 4:29 pm to jmath23lsu
This thread is so interesting to me b/c some people are saying it clearly did and some people are saying it clearly did not with some guy saying it missed him by 4-5".
Not sure how it could be both![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Not sure how it could be both
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 6/23/09 at 4:33 pm to Burkett
quote:
I was yelling at my friends 60yr old Pennsylvanian roommate for saying it wasnt even close.
you're lying if you claim it wasnt close. it was the closest call i maybe have ever seen. I still have no clue if it hit him or not. I'd lean towards not.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 4:34 pm to STEVED00
quote:
some guy saying it missed him by 4-5".
4 or 5 millimeters is more like it(if it did miss him). 4 or 5 inches is incorrect.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 4:37 pm to BullSam
Who is to say we tie in the ninth if anything is changed during earlier innings?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)