- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Flynn vs. Mauck
Posted on 5/12/10 at 1:46 am to red rouse
Posted on 5/12/10 at 1:46 am to red rouse
This isn't even close. Flynn is a better QB than Mauck even with a bum ankle and a bad shoulder.
Mauck was a terrible big game QB. 3 TDs/12 turnovers against ranked teams in 2003 or some terrible stat like that.
Mauck was a terrible big game QB. 3 TDs/12 turnovers against ranked teams in 2003 or some terrible stat like that.
1
Posted on 5/12/10 at 7:14 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
Mauck was a terrible big game QB. 3 TDs/12 turnovers against ranked teams in 2003 or some terrible stat like that.
this is the rant
facts and stats do not matter here.
fwiw, I'd pick Flynn over mauck.
Mauck shite the bed in big games for the most part.
Posted on 5/12/10 at 8:21 am to Boh
If ya'll remember Flynn and Mauck both were very mobile QB's. It was nothing for them to pick up
5 yds. if needed.
I'd go with Mauck cause he was older and had one year of eligibility left.
5 yds. if needed.
I'd go with Mauck cause he was older and had one year of eligibility left.
Posted on 5/12/10 at 8:30 am to jdrumdog
Mauck. Although he didn't have a great arm, I think he had a better arm than Flynn. No slight at all to Clayton, Devery and Skyler, but I would have liked to see what Mauck would have done with DBowe, Early and Buster.
Posted on 5/12/10 at 8:36 am to Suntiger
you mean byrd, young lafell, and hurt early?
i'm gunna go with flynn on this one b/c mauck shite the bed in too many big games
i'm gunna go with flynn on this one b/c mauck shite the bed in too many big games
Posted on 5/12/10 at 8:39 am to jdrumdog
Flynn; He just seemed smarter with the ball.
Posted on 5/12/10 at 10:02 am to SaintsXLIV
Flynn, because he was ( like stated earlier) smarter with the ball
Posted on 5/12/10 at 10:11 am to jdrumdog
Flynn is simply the better QB and better athlete IMO. That being said MM would also be a serious upgrade over the current crop of Tiger QB's. Both were smart, proven winners who won it all. Flynn has more upside though, as proven by him being a Roger's injury away from being an NFL starter.
Posted on 5/12/10 at 10:55 am to RANDY44
quote:Tough to choose. But Mauck gets the slight edge over Flynn IMO, for intangibles (leadership, maturity, game presence). I would not be disappointed to have either Mauck or Flynn suiting up as QB for LSU this coming season.
Both were smart, proven winners who won it all.
Posted on 5/12/10 at 11:22 am to JawjaTigah
Flynn, Mauck was a terrible passer, he kept Oklahoma in the championship game with Pics, he may have been a lil better at running then Flynn, that's it. Flynn only had one season to play for LSU, so the mistakes were acceptable, had he come back another year I think he would have been money.
Posted on 5/12/10 at 12:32 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Mauck shite the bed in big games for the most part.
How many of those games did LSU LOSE?????????????
Posted on 5/12/10 at 1:48 pm to jdrumdog
Flynn
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News