- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Espn 104.5 is know saying Penn St QB could be ...
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:06 pm to harry coleman beast
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:06 pm to harry coleman beast
bolden is worst than jj
0
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:07 pm to harry coleman beast
I really don't care one way or the other....If the coaches think we need another immediate QB on roster, then so be it. It is what it is.
I really hope that the coaches don't think we have that need (because the need in itself is somewhat alarming if it exists), but if they do, they do...and they probably know better than anyone what kind of servicable depth we've got at the position.
I really hope that the coaches don't think we have that need (because the need in itself is somewhat alarming if it exists), but if they do, they do...and they probably know better than anyone what kind of servicable depth we've got at the position.
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:07 pm to harry coleman beast
God, some of y'all are stupid. First of all, even if this ridiculous rumor has any truth (which I say 0% chance of happening), you think his "playing time experience" is what will shoot up to a backup QB on a National Championship caliber program? The kid played horribly on a terrible Penn State team. dumb
Secondly, some of you think that he would ever have a shot at playing coming into an offense that he knows absolutely nothing about. Based off his "experience" he would beat out Rivers and Randall who have been here for over a year. dumb
Third....no there is no third. For people who think he is an actual option, GTFO
Secondly, some of you think that he would ever have a shot at playing coming into an offense that he knows absolutely nothing about. Based off his "experience" he would beat out Rivers and Randall who have been here for over a year. dumb
Third....no there is no third. For people who think he is an actual option, GTFO
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:08 pm to ottothewise
quote:
until we know if Mett is still the starter
you know how many times TM has failed a drug testPosted on 7/24/12 at 1:08 pm to TigahFan4Life
My sarcasm in this thread seems to be going undetected.
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:09 pm to TigahFan4Life
One more thing, if something bad happens to Mett, and this is the guy that Miles is relying on....then I'm worried. I think Rivers is more capable than people think
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:11 pm to TigahFan4Life
quote:
One more thing, if something bad happens to Mett, and this is the guy that Miles is relying on....then I'm worried. I think Rivers is more capable than people think
Then why are you worried if Rivers is more capable than everyone thinks?
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:14 pm to PurpleAndGold86
I should've clarified more. I'm being sarcastic. To some posters, they assume that our backups aren't good enough.
I do think Rivers is underrated. Just my opinion
I do think Rivers is underrated. Just my opinion
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:16 pm to TigahFan4Life
I thought he did very good in the spring game, considering the defense he was up against.
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:17 pm to TigahFan4Life
7 TDs
14 INTs
in the fricking big 10 and people think he'd be a better option than rivers
14 INTs
in the fricking big 10 and people think he'd be a better option than rivers
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:19 pm to sunnydaze
quote:
in the fricking big 10 and people think he'd be a better option than rivers
Right, and in the SEC nonetheless
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:19 pm to Toughcrittercrumb1
as long as mett stay's healthy, who cares. "we" are under the 85 limit, so i'm ok with it.
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:19 pm to D500MAG
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:21 pm to Brendoni
quote:
as long as mett stay's healthy, who cares. "we" are under the 85 limit, so i'm ok with it.
pretty sure this is going toward our recruiting class
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:23 pm to TigahFan4Life
quote:
I thought he did very good in the spring game, considering the defense he was up against. so he should be part of LSU? Excellent point.
I think he was speaking about Rivers.
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:24 pm to bbap
quote:
I think he was speaking about Rivers.
Ohhh! My bad then. Smartass remark retracted
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:25 pm to TigahFan4Life
quote:
pretty sure this is going toward our recruiting class
the way i understand it, since we are under the 85 limit, it won't count against the 25 (or whatever number) for next year. but to be honest, it seems like these rules have 50 different interpetations, so i could be wrong.
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:26 pm to Brendoni
quote:
but to be honest, it seems like these rules have 50 different interpetations, so i could be wrong.
as could I
Hopefully, someone else can clarify
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:29 pm to TigahFan4Life
we're probably both wrong
Posted on 7/24/12 at 1:41 pm to Brendoni
dude is awful
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News