Started By
Message

re: Don't understand melt down over not hiring Herman...

Posted on 11/27/16 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by redbean5
Member since Jan 2008
2286 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 3:02 pm to
I agree, I am 100% behind CEO. Herman could have a been a good hire but I just don't get the love affair so many on this site had for him. He very well be the next Urban or very well the next Stovall.
Don't get me wrong I thought we should have done a more thorough search and I have said all along and got bashed by people on this site that JA would screw this up two ways to Sunday. CEO is the man and I will support him going forward. The ball is now in his court. Win big and he keeps the job, coach like LM then we will move on to the next guy.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
17721 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

You also made the observation in passing (the first I've seen make this observation): We DON'T KNOW what all went went on behind closed doors. All we know is what has been "reported." For all we know, there may well have been (actually, I'll bet there were MANY) more possibles than Fisher, Herman and Orgeron.. Negotiations are done behind closed doors (and are NOT public information) unless one or more parties leaks the discussions to further their case.
There's a very good reason for that. Something many people don't realize too, apparently.

There are many reasons an active coach would not want his current employer knowing he had any contact with another school. One is non-compete clauses. They aren't very common any more and if in place usually apply only to in-conference or to a rival. The other one that stands out to me is your current team is still competing for something significant; which is common because the successful coaches are still playing for something this time of year.

So what happens to guage interest will use a go between that does not have legal authority to extend, negotiate, or sign an offer, in LSU's case I suspect that person was Austin Thomas; sometimes they'll use a booster (security risk there). Can't use admin such as BoS because they represent the school officially. That go-between will talk to the targets agent only. Both sides have plausible deniability, and there's some compartmentalization for security plus if a non-admin employee such as Austin Thomas you can have them sign non-disclosures so if they do leak they can be fired, sued, fined, etc. It is also common to have multiple go-between options. That way you don't have one person who can feed information to one agent/candidate about the competition (part of that compartmentalization); my guess is Sharon Lewis was one of the secondary go-betweens. If that target coach doesn't want his employer to find out he was contacted (for whatever business or personal reason) then you legally didn't negotiate (go-between does not have that power) and you provided enforceable layers & compartmentalization.

In turn... we will never ever hear about it until many years later. If that. So to assume LSU only talked to Fisher, Herman, and Orgeron goes against what is basically standard practice. In the case of Jimbo it was publicly known and Herman is already somewhat of a mercenary and his agent would have conveyed secret or non-secret.

I'll give you an open example: During Ole Miss' coaching search Archie and the search committe did not have the power to negotiate or extend offers. So legally no one would be in a bind if contact was made and there was something like a non-compete clause they didn't know about (Agent's fiduciary obligation to disclose). They also tightly controlled all communication. Emails on a dedicated server and limited & controlled IP phones were the only one's used to make contact. Of course schools not named Ole Miss are very well versed in the control of phones for recruiting violations.

I do know a couple of the bigger LSU TAF funders, not the biggest fish but somewhat connected. They said Perry/TAF and the admin was very very tight lipped about any contacts and had prevented contact between certain AD personnel (including Austin Thomas) and boosters during this search. Though I wonder how enforceable that was. But that's beside the point, if those layers and compartmentalization was in place that means there was very likely one or more non-disclosure feelers put out that were returned 'no interest'. Logic says that's true. So that assumption of the limited search is wrong. Just only a handful of people know how expansive it was and the names involved.
Posted by kwtiger70
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
858 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 3:43 pm to
If you want to see Herman in 3 years look at Sumlin, the last UH coach to move to a power 5 team. If anything Sumlin was thought to be more of a sure bet than Herman but he s very close to the hot seat now. I don't think Herman has enough of a track history to warrant a $5 million contract Ultimately I think he s more Sumlin than Sabah
Posted by CaliTigerForLife
California
Member since Nov 2015
1215 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Alleva proved why guys like Mal Moore and Foley will make LSU and him their bitch for the foreseeable future.


Being Foley retired in October at 63 after 25 years as AD, I don't see that happening.
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7193 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 4:13 pm to
Very interesting read. Thanks for the info as it fits w/ what seems like a reasonable sequence of events to me.
Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

There was absolutely no reason to rush this hire and settle for a guy with a historically bad coaching history as a head coach.



BS. Making the hire now keeps recruits on schedule. It also gives the HC plenty of time to assemble a staff before the top coaches are signed by other schools.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
75740 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

What hostage? LSU could have still gotten O a freaking month from now. There was absolutely no reason to rush this hire and settle for a guy with a historically bad coaching history as a head coach.

No one was going after O, but Alleva proved why guys like Mal Moore and Foley will make LSU and him their bitch for the foreseeable future.



Exactly. Even if Texass had Herman and we got a firm no from Jimbo, I'd be OK with it. I just don't like having a proven loser.
Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

I agree. Should have hired a search firm. Like we've always done.


Yeah! That got us Curly Hallman and Gerry Dinardo. They both are unemployed, maybe we could retread them.
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
39239 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

There was absolutely no reason to rush this hire and settle for a guy with a historically bad coaching history as a head coach.

His HC history at USC and LSU was bad??? RU4 Real?
The rush is to solidify recruiting and remove the guesswork NOW. It's a shame you weren't distributed your fair allotment of brains
Posted by TNTigerman
James Island
Member since Sep 2012
11358 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

Justin Fuente, Willie Taggart, James Franklin, Paul Chryst, Derek Mason, Dan Mullen, Mike Gundy, Dana Holgorson

You're an idiot.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram