- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:56 pm to Gray Tiger
quote:
You know this how? To say that the coaches did nothing to help the team is foolish beyond description.
Exactly how did you get access to the game plan?
Precisely how many practices have you attended?
How many times have you studied the game films?
How many game films have you ever studied?
Would you recognize an adjustment if you saw it?
You have a Madden level of football knowledge, you contradict yourself, and you compare LSU football to MMA.
Give me reason to take your "analysis" seriously.
really bro?
did you watch the game at all?
did you see even the slightest indication toward us trying to exploit any of their weaknesses?
and you still havent given a single shred of evidence that would point to the contrary. just saying im wrong doesnt actually make me wrong. please, im begging you, PROVE me wrong.
are you really too dumb to undertsatnd what an analogy is. the point of the MMA example was that if your opponent has a weakness you should exploit it. you dont play into their strengths (even if its your strength too) and give them a chance. just so you know we were fighter A and we let fighter B knock us out instead of taking it to the matt where he is vulnerable. i guess i should explain that last part since you dont really get the whole anology thing. it means that we should have thrown the ball more against their god awful secondary instead of trying to run at their very talented fron 7. was that clear enough for you?
and if i have a "madden level" of football knowledge then i dont even want to know how youd classify yourself cuz you havent said a single smart thing yet. all you do is say im wrong and try to insult me. its really quite funny.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:02 pm to Gray Tiger
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You know this how? To say that the coaches did nothing to help the team is foolish beyond description.
Exactly how did you get access to the game plan?
Precisely how many practices have you attended?
How many times have you studied the game films?
How many game films have you ever studied?
Would you recognize an adjustment if you saw it?
You have a Madden level of football knowledge, you contradict yourself, and you compare LSU football to MMA.
Give me reason to take your "analysis" seriously.
WTF??????
Dude, the nation saw us get our azzes whipped for 3 qtrs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Eye mf witness!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You know this how? To say that the coaches did nothing to help the team is foolish beyond description.
Exactly how did you get access to the game plan?
Precisely how many practices have you attended?
How many times have you studied the game films?
How many game films have you ever studied?
Would you recognize an adjustment if you saw it?
You have a Madden level of football knowledge, you contradict yourself, and you compare LSU football to MMA.
Give me reason to take your "analysis" seriously.
WTF??????
Dude, the nation saw us get our azzes whipped for 3 qtrs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Eye mf witness!!!
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:03 pm to demtigers73
quote:
WTF??????
Dude, the nation saw us get our azzes whipped for 3 qtrs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Eye mf witness!!!
PREACH
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:13 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
really bro?
I'm not your bro, brah or braw or baw.
You claimed that the coached did nothing to help the team. I asked you to show me how you know this. All you have done was rant. I want you to prove that there was no game plan, no coaching in practice and/or coaching during the game.
I want you to prove that there were no alignment adjustments, no split adjustments, no angle adjustments. I want you to prove to me that similar looking plays were run exactly the same. I want you to prove that there was no difference in blocking scheme, depth, or pace. Demonstrate to me that there were no changes in response to changes in the defense.
I want conclusive proof that there was nothing done during the game to help the team win.
Although I'm pretty sure you wouldn't know the difference, I'd just like to see you try. Stop ranting and babbling and show me you know some real football.
You laid your thesis out there. Now prove it.
Or go watch some WWE.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:20 pm to Gray Tiger
heres your evidence since i guess you didnt watch the game.
again your not very good at this.
again your not very good at this.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:28 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
heres your evidence since i guess you didnt watch the game.
In other words you have no clue.
I want you to prove your assertion.
Man up. Prove that the coaches did nothing to help the team win. The fact that they failed in the attempt proves nothing.
Sometimes you try and fail. You of all people should understand failure.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:33 pm to Gray Tiger
im siiting here tryng to figure out who could possibly be this dumb and it just dawned on me. your Les Miles arent you?
well listen Les just because your gameplan was utterly rediculous and stupid doesnt mean you should come get all butt hurt on the rant about people calling you out.
im still waiting on you to provide ANY evidence to support the so called gameplan that i supposedly cant see.
well listen Les just because your gameplan was utterly rediculous and stupid doesnt mean you should come get all butt hurt on the rant about people calling you out.
im still waiting on you to provide ANY evidence to support the so called gameplan that i supposedly cant see.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:36 pm to Gray Tiger
its you that i dont think grasps what a gameplan is. it doesnt matter if the plays were run exactly the same way or not. the fact that we repeatedly tried to run straight at that front 7 when the secondary was their clear weakness is evidence that we didnt have a gameplan in place to attack their weakness. its not like this is week 1 and we had no idea what they had. we were well aware that their front 7 was nasty and their secondary was suspect.
now your turn. tell me when we did ANYTHING to attack any of their weaknesses.
now your turn. tell me when we did ANYTHING to attack any of their weaknesses.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:37 pm to Gray Tiger
Here you go jackwagon,
MSU: Rushing yds 302 LSU: Rushing yds 89
MSU Rushing Attempts: 49 LSU: 35
MSU Yards per rush 6.2 LSU: 2.5
MSST 14 3 14 3 34
#8 LSU 0 3 7 19 29
Take away the 4th qtr play against the second team D and the late turnover and this was actually a blowout! If you don't understand that you are in denial or don't know football, the jacks forum is always available!

MSU: Rushing yds 302 LSU: Rushing yds 89
MSU Rushing Attempts: 49 LSU: 35
MSU Yards per rush 6.2 LSU: 2.5
MSST 14 3 14 3 34
#8 LSU 0 3 7 19 29
Take away the 4th qtr play against the second team D and the late turnover and this was actually a blowout! If you don't understand that you are in denial or don't know football, the jacks forum is always available!
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:40 pm to demtigers73
quote:
Here you go jackwagon,
MSU: Rushing yds 302 LSU: Rushing yds 89
MSU Rushing Attempts: 49 LSU: 35
MSU Yards per rush 6.2 LSU: 2.5
1 2 3 4 T
MSST 14 3 14 3 34
#8 LSU 0 3 7 19 29
Take away the 4th qtr play against the second team D and the late turnover and this was actually a blowout! If you don't understand that you are in denial or don't know football, the jacks forum is always available!
i appreciate the leg work
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:46 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
i appreciate the leg work
Which does NOT prove your point.
All I read from the entire pack of crying babies is that you really don't understand football.
Now both of you go get stoked on MMA.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:49 pm to Gray Tiger
You need to go find the jacks forum!
Former Cheerleader? Band member?
Former Cheerleader? Band member?
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:55 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
I actually said this during the game. It never seems like we game plan for our opponents, or try to scheme against their weakness.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:06 pm to Gray Tiger
listen Les, youre a trip man. its like you lack cognitive skills all together. just so you know that means that if A=B and B=C then A must also =C. in plane terms its connecting the dots.
ill try this one last time since you are so incredibly dense.
MSU strength: defensive front 7
MSU weakness: secondary
you with me so far?
what LSU SHOULD have done: throw on weak secondary
what LSU DID: run the ball right at strong front 7
point and case LSU did not gameplan MSU because if they did they would have thrown the ball on their terrible secondary instead of run at that nasty front 7.
thats the problem. we never gameplan the opponent. we have the same vanilla gameplan week in and week out no matter who we play.
if you still dont get it then you really should just watch another sport cuz you obviously dont understand football.
ill try this one last time since you are so incredibly dense.
MSU strength: defensive front 7
MSU weakness: secondary
you with me so far?
what LSU SHOULD have done: throw on weak secondary
what LSU DID: run the ball right at strong front 7
point and case LSU did not gameplan MSU because if they did they would have thrown the ball on their terrible secondary instead of run at that nasty front 7.
thats the problem. we never gameplan the opponent. we have the same vanilla gameplan week in and week out no matter who we play.
if you still dont get it then you really should just watch another sport cuz you obviously dont understand football.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:58 pm to dgnx6
We stayed in the goal line formation for 4 downs from the 2. We gave the ball back to MS at the 2.
I would hope in the future we would go to 2 or 3 WR set and either run of pass. We don't have the horses up front to control most SEC teams.
I would hope in the future we would go to 2 or 3 WR set and either run of pass. We don't have the horses up front to control most SEC teams.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 11:05 pm to Gray Tiger
Your the idiot. The first half we continued to try and pound the ball between the tackles with little to show for it.
We should have started throwing the ball a lot earlier. We need balance on offense.
We aren't as bad as that game showed but we aren't as good as I hoped we would be. Les tried to ride the defense to a win and it did not happen. Could be a long season.
We should have started throwing the ball a lot earlier. We need balance on offense.
We aren't as bad as that game showed but we aren't as good as I hoped we would be. Les tried to ride the defense to a win and it did not happen. Could be a long season.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 11:09 pm to dljtigers
quote:
Your the idiot
Lol.
Never change, Tigah Rant.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 11:09 pm to dljtigers
quote:I didn't think it was a bad call, without hindsight.
We stayed in the goal line formation for 4 downs from the 2.
I think Les learned a lot about this OL on those 4 downs.
Posted on 9/26/14 at 12:00 am to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:Alot of folks keep forgetting that Mississippi State had the ball inside our 10 yard line with around six minutes or so left in the fourth quarter and passed on a field goal. You would think if the score was closer they would have taken the points. We just totally got our asses kicked from the head coach to the ball boys. It's a shame, but we were embarrassed last Saturday.
we should have kicked a field goal instead of going for it on 4th. Then we don't have to go for 2pt. conversions on 2 of our TDs late in the game. And guess what the score would have been? you ready for this? 31-31.
Popular
Back to top


0




