- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:28 pm to Broski
quote:
A running option would be Randall, not Bolden. It's a joke that you even thought that.
He's a better runner than what we have now, and presumably a more polished passer than Randall.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:29 pm to Wazoo
quote:
He's a better runner than Mett
Uh, no.
Here's some food for thought. These are Bolden's stats from last year when he was at Penn State:
53/135 39.3% for 685 yards, 2 TDs, 7 INTs. 29 carries for 38 yards.
I'd rather not see him on the field against Bama.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:31 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Wazoo
I RA'D for racism. Enjoy your banhammer.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:32 pm to la_birdman
Just because he didn't run often doesn't mean he can't. I'm not claiming that he's Tim tebow, but if Mett continues to be very average passing the ball why not try to add one more dimension. It worked last year in Tuscaloosa.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:32 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Mett runs a 4.58
Mett runs a 4.58 like I hang with supermodels and OT 10s on my private jet.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:33 pm to Broski
quote:
quote: Wazoo I RA'D for racism. Enjoy your banhammer.
Yea don't let the facts slap you in the face.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:34 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Just because he didn't run often doesn't mean he can't
So we'd put a guy out there that hardly runs and is not the best passer? Against Alabama?
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:34 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Yea don't let the facts slap you in the face.
The only "facts" you were going off of was that one guys is white and the other is black, therefore black guy is a runner and whitie is not.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:35 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
Mett runs a 4.58 like I hang with supermodels and OT 10s on my private jet.
Actually I'm glad you said that. I mistyped. His low 40 time was a 4.78. Average was a 4.87. I'm on my phone or I would link it. That's .3 seconds slower than Bolden, but Bolden isn't more athletic, okay.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:35 pm to la_birdman
I still don't know why we have Bolden on the team. I know we need depth at QB but talented depth.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:36 pm to Broski
quote:
The only "facts" you were going off of was that one guys is white and the other is black, therefore black guy is a runner and whitie is not.
I posted 40 times...
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:37 pm to Wazoo
quote:
Yea don't let the facts slap you in the face.
Seems like you're the one not grasping the facts.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:37 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
I still don't know why we have Bolden on the team.
TC McCartney type guy that Miles liked and since he came from Penn St., he doesn't count against the scholarship limit, right?
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:37 pm to Broski
quote:
I would say they are about equal. I think in a footrace between the three, Mettenberger barely wins. You obviously didn't watch Bolden at PSU if you think he can run.
I seriously doubt Mett would beat Bolden or anyone in a foot race. Bolden didn't run much at all at Penn St., but they had him down as a 4.5 - 4.6 40 coming out of high school.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:38 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
I still don't know why we have Bolden on the team. I know we need depth at QB but talented depth.
I think it was just to have someone with starting college QB experience on the roster as a backup.
Mett goes down, none of the others have started a college game.
That's my guess. I really don't know. Just a guess.
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:38 pm to la_birdman
Dude Mett isn't exactly lighting it up. But fine, take bolden out of the conversation. Would you put Randall in for a particular package?
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:39 pm to Broski
Broski = Warren Moon
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:39 pm to Broski
Broski = Warren Moon
Posted on 10/27/12 at 11:39 pm to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
I seriously doubt Mett would beat Bolden or anyone in a foot race. Bolden didn't run much at all at Penn St., but they had him down as a 4.5 - 4.6 40 coming out of high school.
The point is that the difference is negligible at best and the OP is a racist idiot for thinking that Bolden would magically be averaging 5 yards a pop running the option.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News