- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did Chavis begin to trust his CBs in the 2nd half?
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:09 am to Moustache
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:09 am to Moustache
No im not even talking about anything youve said. Im simply looking at your post history and can say that you are out of your fricking mind. You may want to think about a break from LSU football.
1
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:16 am to lsuhunt555
quote:
No im not even talking about anything youve said. Im simply looking at your post history and can say that you are out of your fricking mind. You may want to think about a break from LSU football.
Contrary to your beliefs, I enjoyed the frick out of the game Saturday. The offense was amazing and it was great to watch a big win.
coming to the tiger rant to *GASP* rant about our D and you not being able to handle anything short of (LESTICLES IS AWESOME/LSU#1 YEAH) is not my problem. It sounds like it's your own insecurities that you can't be objective and take criticism of your team.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:27 am to Moustache
quote:
Losing 5 is a possibility next year
We have loss five under Miles one time and we had to have a combination of one of the worse years a LSU QB ever had and one of the worse LSU defenses ever.
Anything in sports is possible, but to suggest a program that has been out of the top ten a total of one week during football season since 2010 might lose five games because we will be starting a new QB is fricking clueless or wishful thinking.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:29 am to Moustache
quote:
It sounds like it's your own insecurities that you can't be objective and take criticism of your team.
#6yeardecline
#someguywroteanarticlewasrightaboutdecline
#2014recruitingclassfallingapart
#pastrecruitingclasseswayoverrated
#EdParisdecommit
#nowayLSUlandsTonyBrown
#TimetorealizeLSUwillneverhaveanothergreatdefense
#Idontknowwhatcyclicalmeans
#losing9playerstoNFLisnoexcuse
This post was edited on 10/7/13 at 11:31 am
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:30 am to LSU Groupee
quote:
Anything in sports is possible, but to suggest a program that has been out of the top ten a total of one week during football season since 2010 might lose five games because we will be starting a new QB is fricking clueless or wishful thinking.
Or you can sit there and just ignore that fact that not ONLY will LSU be breaking in a brand new QB with no experience whatsoever, They'll likely have a new RB, new LT, 2 new WRS coupled with a D that will more than likely be average.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:30 am to LSU Groupee
To be honest, next year really worries me.
With how much we are going to lose on offense, and seeing these young guys on defense, next year could be a struggle.
With how much we are going to lose on offense, and seeing these young guys on defense, next year could be a struggle.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 11:34 am to Prominentwon
quote:
6yeardecline
I still don't know where you're getting this from.
quote:
#someguywroteanarticlewasrightaboutdecline
he is so far about declining this year and maybe next. Not sure where you're getting 6 years from.
quote:
#2014recruitingclassfallingapart
You forget the conditional statement I had behind that. IF we lost a position coach.
quote:
pastrecruitingclasseswayoverrated
judging our DTs, LBs, and Safeties, I'd say so.
quote:
#EdParisdecommit
Probably not. Hootie is possible though.
quote:
#nowayLSUlandsTonyBrown
never said that at all. You're making shite up again because some said something mean about your wittle tigers.
quote:
TimetorealizeLSUwillneverhaveanothergreatdefense
quote:
#Idontknowwhatcyclicalmeans
Well, if you're taking the cyclical argument, isn't our down cycle or #decline about due? Dummy.
quote:
#losing9playerstoNFLisnoexcuse
Minter, Mingo, Montgomery, Logan, Simon, Reid. That's only 6. Not to say it isn't HUGE, but to say this is all on experience is dumb.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:10 pm to themunch
quote:
.Michael Brockers, Sam Montgomery, Mingo, Kevin Minter, Tyrann, and Eric Reid LSU defense that gave up the winning td in 30 seconds.
Maybe they didn't wanna dominate Bama only to get Chavised again.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:16 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Maybe they didn't wanna dominate Bama only to get Chavised again
People say this as a troll, but I definitely think the Bama choke from '11 champ game and last year had something to do with all the juniors leaving.
Sam, mingo, and Reid were all leaving regardless because they got high grades.
In a typical year though, Logan, Minter, and Simon stay to help win a championship.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:25 pm to wilceaux
quote:
next year really worries me.
Every year really worries me.
Take this year:
Zach was coming off a mediocre 2012 year, our defense was giving up an alarming amount of yardage to QBs with a beating heart, we had our third OC joining us in the last three years, we had loss maybe the most talent off the team from the year before that we had ever experienced, and our most talented RB was hanging on to the team by a thread.
I don't see 2014 topping that and so far, we are a Top 10 team.
As long as we have one the most successful staffs in the NCAA, we will be ok.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:26 pm to Prominentwon
Here is the problem that I have with all the fans complaining about needing to blitz more:
Who has proven to have the ability to consistently get to the QB if he does call it? Answer: nobody
Who has proven to have the ability to consistently get to the QB if he does call it? Answer: nobody
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:31 pm to baobabtiger
quote:
Here is the problem that I have with all the fans complaining about needing to blitz more:
Who has proven to have the ability to consistently get to the QB if he does call it? Answer: nobody
Yeah, but who has proven at LB that they can stop the run? Who has proven in the secondary that they can cover their WRS for 6+ seconds due to the QB having all day long to pass?
Answer: nobody
Might as well blitz. See UGA game. The difference in their game winning drive compared to our last attempt to get into FG range is they blitzed. The blitz fricked mett up and caused him to make 2 poor throws.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:52 pm to Moustache
Call me crazy, but I don't think anything you have said is that crazy!
Posted on 10/7/13 at 12:59 pm to lsu480
quote:
Call me crazy, but I don't think anything you have said is that crazy!
Me neither.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 1:01 pm to Moustache
News flash:
It's not LB's that are messing up. It's the DE's. most rushing yards allowed by lsu have been off tackle on both sides. On this Runs the DE is taken out of the play every time. Have LB's been good? No. But it all starts with the DE's.
It's not LB's that are messing up. It's the DE's. most rushing yards allowed by lsu have been off tackle on both sides. On this Runs the DE is taken out of the play every time. Have LB's been good? No. But it all starts with the DE's.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 1:12 pm to baobabtiger
This really haven't been talked about with our defense. I wonder if chief is starting to toy with the ideal of a 3-4 defense. In the second half I saw the defense move to a 3-4 and low and behold they got pressure on the QB. With the spread offensives it looks like everyone are starting to move that direction. We have the LBs to do it. Ego an freak already taken double teams it just seams the logical choice to move 3-4.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 1:42 pm to Prominentwon
Statistically, the defense performed better in the second half. They obviously allowed far fewer points. However, a closer examination reveals that the defense may not have actually performed demonstrably better after half time. The "stops" that I can recall offhand included:
(1) A missed FG;
(2) An INT resulting from a grotesque overthrow to a wide open receiver along the sidelines on 3rd and long. I suppose you can give some scintilla of credit to the pass rush, some Tiger may have been in in the general vicinity of the QB, but it was primarily just a terrible throw;
(3) A deflected pass by Martin to an open receiver in the sideline gap of the cover two scheme. I give Martin credit for recovering, but a timely pass on the right trajectory would have resulted in a huge gain.
(4) A fumble in desperation time.
I'm grateful all of these plays occurred, but I don't really know if they signaled a true improvement in the defensive execution, or if they were merely a product of MSU blunders.
(1) A missed FG;
(2) An INT resulting from a grotesque overthrow to a wide open receiver along the sidelines on 3rd and long. I suppose you can give some scintilla of credit to the pass rush, some Tiger may have been in in the general vicinity of the QB, but it was primarily just a terrible throw;
(3) A deflected pass by Martin to an open receiver in the sideline gap of the cover two scheme. I give Martin credit for recovering, but a timely pass on the right trajectory would have resulted in a huge gain.
(4) A fumble in desperation time.
I'm grateful all of these plays occurred, but I don't really know if they signaled a true improvement in the defensive execution, or if they were merely a product of MSU blunders.
This post was edited on 10/7/13 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 10/7/13 at 1:44 pm to baobabtiger
quote:
It's not LB's that are messing up. It's the DE's. most rushing yards allowed by lsu have been off tackle on both sides. On this Runs the DE is taken out of the play every time. Have LB's been good? No. But it all starts with the DE's.
I can't disagree with you there. Rasco is especially bad about getting turned in. Hunter has youth as an excuse, and Allen is probably better of the 3, but is still painfully average.
But, there's no doubt Welter whiffs on a bunch of tackles, along with Barrow. Those guys should be getting killer stats. I'm not saying it'll solve our problems, but it'll turn 8-10 yd gains into 4-5 yd gains at least.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 1:47 pm to Amish threesome
quote:
This really haven't been talked about with our defense. I wonder if chief is starting to toy with the ideal of a 3-4 defense. In the second half I saw the defense move to a 3-4 and low and behold they got pressure on the QB. With the spread offensives it looks like everyone are starting to move that direction. We have the LBs to do it. Ego an freak already taken double teams it just seams the logical choice to move 3-4.
lol wut?
We have nowhere near the personnel to run a 3-4 defense. Hell, we're too small on the dline for a 4-3, let alone a 3-4.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 2:06 pm to Moustache
quote:
We have nowhere near the personnel to run a 3-4 defense. Hell, we're too small on the dline for a 4-3, let alone a 3-4.
I think he's confusing the 3-4 with the "mustang" package.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News