- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did Alabama outplay LSU ? Every Bama fan I talk to says this.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:00 am to theunknownknight
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:00 am to theunknownknight
If they outplayed us and still lost, that's a big fail somewhere! 
1
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:01 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Now I understand you can't read as I have taken two blatant shots at Saban in this very thread. I guess you missed those two posts when you were obsessing over my posting history.
Tell us more about how awesome Cade Foster is.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:01 am to That One
quote:
If they outplayed us and still lost, that's a big fail somewhere!
I agree and that big fail is Saban.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:02 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
Tell us more about how awesome Cade Foster is.
I see all you have left is to divert at this point. Nice try though. Reality is nice, you should try living in it tomorrow for once. Good night.
This post was edited on 11/10/11 at 1:03 am
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:05 am to wahoocs
quote:
That's what happens when your QB is not a threat to run the ball against a stout, SEC-type defense.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:05 am to theunknownknight
quote:
I see all you have left is to divert at this point. Nice try though. Reality is nice, you should try living in it tomorrow for once. Good night.
So you still think it's reasonable to have a guy that has never made a 50 yard field goal in his career, and had only made one field goal all year, was reasonable to be kicking said field goal?
Yeah dude, just a missed opportunity. It was a gimme. Even another poster said that those field goals didn't have the distance. You said he "shanked" them. give me a fricking break, you've been exposed.
This post was edited on 11/10/11 at 1:06 am
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:07 am to theunknownknight
Bama had 96 yards rushing to our 148! They definately ran all over us. Passing they had 199 to our 91 and we can understand that with Jefferson in. About half of their passing yards were from Trents two passes that were blown coverages by our LB's!! Bama had 17 first downs and LSU 15. Both had 2 turnovers.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:16 am to hemiroid
@theunknownknight
The LSU D is opportunistic and aggressive - stats or points are not a high ranked component of Chavis'/Miles' game plan - refer to WVU/Oregon/MSU - giving up yards as well as low scoring.
The Bama D on the other hand is based on being run stuffers and preventing mistakes.
The Bama O had a heisman Running Back candidate TR and the LSU had a stable, which if we are truthful, is second tier to TR.
The LSU D contained Bama
The Bama D gave up thrice as many rushing yards to LSU as their average for the year.
LSU was the first team to get 100 yards rushing on the Bama D
The LSU D repeatedly stopped the Bama O from getting near the end zone and forced Saban to go for FGs from improbable (given the history of their KickerS) distances because he was not going to sniff the end zone for a TD.
In OT - when things are equal and start 0-0 - the LSU D came up big and sacked AJM.
The Bama D gave up a RUSHING 1st down and then proceeded to lose the game.
Yes Bama was indeed better
The LSU D is opportunistic and aggressive - stats or points are not a high ranked component of Chavis'/Miles' game plan - refer to WVU/Oregon/MSU - giving up yards as well as low scoring.
The Bama D on the other hand is based on being run stuffers and preventing mistakes.
The Bama O had a heisman Running Back candidate TR and the LSU had a stable, which if we are truthful, is second tier to TR.
The LSU D contained Bama
The Bama D gave up thrice as many rushing yards to LSU as their average for the year.
LSU was the first team to get 100 yards rushing on the Bama D
The LSU D repeatedly stopped the Bama O from getting near the end zone and forced Saban to go for FGs from improbable (given the history of their KickerS) distances because he was not going to sniff the end zone for a TD.
In OT - when things are equal and start 0-0 - the LSU D came up big and sacked AJM.
The Bama D gave up a RUSHING 1st down and then proceeded to lose the game.
Yes Bama was indeed better
This post was edited on 11/10/11 at 1:17 am
Posted on 11/10/11 at 1:26 am to bpope
How about we stop talking about this subject. All this does is keep the dialog going. Let them think whatever they want. It's not the consensus of the nation. Tigers are overwhelming number one and most all are saying Bama blew their chance. This should be the end of it
Posted on 11/10/11 at 2:01 am to bpope
rushing yards 148-96, we manhandled them in the trenches
Posted on 11/10/11 at 2:13 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
That's what happens when your QB is not a threat to run the ball against a stout, SEC-type defense.
This is the dumbest comment I've ever seen. Thats why we got our arse kicked by Ryan Mallet last year?
Posted on 11/10/11 at 2:18 am to Lacour
quote:
How about we stop talking about this subject. All this does is keep the dialog going
I think quite the opposite - if we keep talking about - no matter how deluded they are about thinking that they had the better team, better D, better O and better butter than I can't believe its butter
It still has to rankle that they lost the game. Every time they are forced to defend - it impinges in that daemon process that the reason they have to defend is because they couldn't do so on the field. That the talking has to be on message boards.
Don't tell me that they wouldn't be here throwing up the score till kingdom come if they had won the game.
Cartman does it best - the sad tears are indeed sweet.
(Thanks LSUFreek)
Posted on 11/10/11 at 2:21 am to geauxgeebs
Haven't read the whole thread but here is how I view it.
Alabama had hands down a far superior team. The talent on their side of the ball out weighed our talent by a considerable amount. We shouldn't even be able to hang with them for a half much less a whole game.
Just boils down to their superior team got out coached!
Of course as dumb as the gumps are they still aren't going to accept that. It will be thrown back at you that LSU just got lucky.
Then on to plan B:
"Yep. we just got lucky and of course the refs obviously stole the game from Bama, in a biased Tiger fan can see that the refs were paid off or something."
Nothing hurts worse than getting beat by a superior team than getting beat by an inferior team that cheated.
Let them pick why they lost. The only answer that could make them feel even halfway ok with the loss is an option they will never take... LSU is superior. Let them wallow in their sorrows.
Alabama had hands down a far superior team. The talent on their side of the ball out weighed our talent by a considerable amount. We shouldn't even be able to hang with them for a half much less a whole game.
Just boils down to their superior team got out coached!
Of course as dumb as the gumps are they still aren't going to accept that. It will be thrown back at you that LSU just got lucky.
Then on to plan B:
"Yep. we just got lucky and of course the refs obviously stole the game from Bama, in a biased Tiger fan can see that the refs were paid off or something."
Nothing hurts worse than getting beat by a superior team than getting beat by an inferior team that cheated.
Let them pick why they lost. The only answer that could make them feel even halfway ok with the loss is an option they will never take... LSU is superior. Let them wallow in their sorrows.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 2:23 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
Starting to question this.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 2:31 am to theunknownknight
I'm watching the CST replay and it seems as though TR either quits or gets very winded during the 2nd half. Our DL is winning the LOS battle in the second half. Also, I think we have 4 honey badgers in our secondary!
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:06 am to motorbreath
quote:
I'm watching the CST replay and it seems as though TR either quits or gets very winded during the 2nd half. Our DL is winning the LOS battle in the second half. Also, I think we have 4 honey badgers in our secondary!
It was an eye opener to see that Trent Richardson , who could not be stopped by one player alone, get tackled multiple times by Brandon Taylor, Sam and others one on one.
This post was edited on 11/10/11 at 3:06 am
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:12 am to CalTiger
We took over the game. We won the los battles.
Folks that think Bama played considerably better than LSU are only thinking of a couple of busted plays.
We had:
More rushing yards
More ypc
Fewer loss of yardage plays
More points
We could have played two more quarters and beat them like a drum up and down the field
Folks that think Bama played considerably better than LSU are only thinking of a couple of busted plays.
We had:
More rushing yards
More ypc
Fewer loss of yardage plays
More points
We could have played two more quarters and beat them like a drum up and down the field
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:30 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Saban got cute and screwed Bama with the Maze pass play
theunknownknight
You sound more like a butt hurt Bama fan than an LSU fan
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:39 am to bpope
It's as simple as this. If Bama outplayed us, they would have the win.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:48 am to omegaman66
quote:
Alabama had hands down a far superior team.
omegaman66 You are out of you r mind
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News