Started By
Message
locked post

Chances we can get to 125 home runs this year?

Posted on 1/23/09 at 11:51 am
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68276 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 11:51 am
Got exactly 100 last year...could we get to the 125 mark this year? Wish we still had the big bats to break 188
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28333 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 11:51 am to
I don't know........will be tough without Matt Clark.
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38116 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 11:52 am to
Matt Clark is a big loss in that department
Posted by Lee Chatelain
I love the OT!
Member since Oct 2008
11324 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 11:54 am to
No....
Posted by LST
Member since Jan 2007
16316 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 11:59 am to
I think we will be more around 85-90.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
39772 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 11:59 am to
Yea I think we will do it
Posted by LSUBASEBALL06
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
3407 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:01 pm to
we have a shot because the power numbers up and down the roster have improved. We may not have a "Clark" with a ton of hrs but we should have several in the teens. I am looking for Gibbs to have a breakout year with alot of HRS also for Ochinko to step up this year along with Dean doing what Dean does. Also look for Landry to be more comfortable this season.

Everything is lining up right...
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96003 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:02 pm to
thats a huge increase especially when you lost your best homerun hitter. i say no way we get to that mark.
Posted by TexasTigah
Houston, TX
Member since Mar 2006
12183 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:03 pm to
Don't see it happening.
Posted by LSUBASEBALL06
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
3407 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:04 pm to
doubters are good. I have always liked for people to say that you cant do it.

Out to proove alot of people wrong.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
20014 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:06 pm to
Not gonna happen. Assuming about 70 games if we get to Omaha, thats 1.78 per game.
Posted by Cajunboy19
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
1692 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:10 pm to
The new park might be a dead ballpark also. The old box was a launching pad.
Posted by cornerblitz22
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
593 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:12 pm to
I havent heard much talk about it, but is the New Box supposed to be a launching pad like its predecessor? I mean they both are facing the same direction so the wind and everything should be the same right?
Posted by Cajunboy19
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
1692 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:17 pm to
Should be the same but you never know. I have played on a ton of parks and some feel different than others even with the same dimensions.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:19 pm to
I think 100 is doable again. Gibbs should see a power spike and I think removing Hollander from the lineup will lead to more homers.

clark will be tough to replace, but I do think we'll have more balanced power from top to bottom in the order. Maybe we'll go back to having every starter hit 10 homers.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
20014 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

but is the New Box supposed to be a launching pad like its predecessor?


They should have installed huge fans at the top of the grandstand, but only turn them on when we are batting.
Posted by lesgeaux
Member since Jul 2008
3359 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:21 pm to
Matt Clark gone weakens it a little. But I expect LeMahieu and Gibbs to have a very strong year, homerun-wise, at the plate. I say we're near last year's total.
Posted by TigerBull
VP/BR/LC
Member since Oct 2007
1466 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

They should have installed huge fans at the top of the grandstand, but only turn them on when we are batting


haha not a bad idea
i bet they could still install them
Posted by cornerblitz22
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
593 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

quote:


They should have installed huge fans at the top of the grandstand, but only turn them on when we are batting




haha not a bad idea
i bet they could still install them


But then the new box will never be finished in time
Posted by LSUTygerFan
Homerun Village
Member since Jun 2008
33232 posts
Posted on 1/23/09 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

havent heard much talk about it, but is the New Box supposed to be a launching pad like its predecessor?


Read somewhere that the outfield walls were like 2 feet higher. That along with losing the nation's hr leader from last year is gonna hurt your chance for hitting 125. But. I'm hoping.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram