Started By
Message

re: Burrow & SEC QBs drop rate vs NFL's - CFB Film Room Debunked

Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:39 am to
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9128 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:39 am to
quote:

As the OP stated, it depends on who is doing the analysis and what that person decides is a drop.

For some folks, a drop is anything that the receiver gets his hands on that does not result in a catch. It does not matter what the circumstance is.

I'm more forgiving on drops. If the ball goes through the receiver's hands (like the Eagles receiver the other day), then that's a drop.


Yeah, drops can be very subjective, especially when they're being tallied by non-professional volunteers.

For example, looking back at the Miami game, there were two clear drops where the receiver got both hands on the ball with no DB making contact.

Then there were two other "drops" where it could've certainly been caught, but there was a DB right there making a play on the ball as well.

Depending on how you're keeping score at home, someone could say LSU had anywhere from 2 to 4 drops in the Miami game. That's a 100% difference so yeah, multiply that subjectivity by 10 games, and you'll get some messed up stats.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 8:42 am
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61440 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:39 am to
But the data says they weren’t dropping balls

Burrow was ranked 88th in completion percentage

The OP would have you to believe he is one of a few QBs that had any challenges.

Burrow had to improve, he did. Balls were delivered better and more accurately and his numbers went up. He can improve more

Haskins completed 70 percent.

The joe defender thought he got screwed at OSU too.

I see a trend of the OP looking for excuses for Burrow. Thank God Burrow doesn’t think the same way



Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:43 am to
All the same nega-tigers defending the cheeseball amateur site that claims Burrow's WRs were sure-handed compared to the rest of the SEC. Ridiculous! LOL
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79430 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:44 am to
Do they state their criteria?

I wouldnt Be surprised if a lot of our drops don’t get counted because they excuse them for coverage reasons.

Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:47 am to
quote:

For all the WR drop and bad OL - go find average time possessing the ball before getting rid of it. NFL Time to Throw is 2.55 (Derek Carr) maxing out at just 3.22 seconds (Josh Allen).

I rarely saw LSU get rid of the ball that fast this year.

I'd agree with that point. But that is scheme, not QB play. Way too many long-developing pass plays. Hope all that changes drastically with a new passing-game/WR coach.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 8:49 am
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10479 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:49 am to
quote:

50 or more CFB "advanced analysts" may have contributed to the SEC drop chart. Each with their own opinion on drops.
This isn't true according to their site and there are guidelines for their stats.
I happen to agree sacks shouldn't be used against rush yard totals, which is what they refer to regarding "rushing and passing yards".

Are you arguing there's a different metric for LSU's drop rate than the other 13 SEC teams?
If not, then your point with NFL is moot, besides previously mentioned fact NFL WRs are the best that CFB has to offer.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61440 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:50 am to
So they only have a bias against Joe

Why do Tuas numbers pass the eye test.

Just ol Joe getting screwed again. The stats are skewed just in regard to him
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Are you arguing there's a different metric for LSU's drop rate than the other 13 SEC teams?
If not, then your point with NFL is moot, besides previously mentioned fact NFL WRs are the best that CFB has to offer.

No. I'm saying rank amateurs are allowed to grade game film with zero professional requirements. TOTAL Amateur Hour
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61440 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:55 am to
As are your perceptions.

The problem you have is that by every metric Joe has a real bad first half of the season.

He was the worst ranked starter in the SEC for a long while.

You will blame everyone else, but there was one common denominator.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22971 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:01 am to
quote:

And the highest drop rate in the NFL is 5.5%. While the lowest drop rate in the SEC is 8.7%.


You went through all that without even realizing that you’re looking at two different stats. The NFL stats you quotes are the percentage of targets that are dropped. The CFB stat is the percentage of incompletions that are dropped.

One would expect the percentage of targets dropped to be lower given that more than half of those targets will be completions.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:02 am to
quote:

As are your perceptions.

The problem you have is that by every metric Joe has a real bad first half of the season.

By all metrics? BS. The only one that matters is W/L. LSU was 5-1 and ranked.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61440 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:02 am to
quote:

I'd agree with that point. But that is scheme, not QB play
excuse 1000

Man this is pathetic
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61440 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:04 am to
Is this thread about the team? I’ve never seen you concerned with the team.

If so maybe you should change the Thread title......and the content.


The fact that the team played well enough to overcome rough QB play is thread worthy.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71137 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:08 am to
The key variable I see is the NFL numbers are drops as a percentage of targets (which would imply that catches are included in the denominator), while the college part is drops as a percentage of incompletions, removing completions from the denominator.
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10479 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:09 am to
quote:

No. I'm saying rank amateurs are allowed to grade game film with zero professional requirements.
If they have a guideline, as stated, it wouldn't take a brain surgeon to record the stats.
It might be their metric indicates a pass play stripped by DB was catchable and recorded a drop.
As posted earlier, it would be normalized across all 14 teams unless you think there's a Burreaux Conspiracy.

There was also a stat study by same site regarding LSU lack of YAC that you don't seem to have near as much issue with.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Is this thread about the team? I’ve never seen you concerned with the team.

If so maybe you should change the Thread title......and the content.


The fact that the team played well enough to overcome rough QB play is thread worthy.


Joe's team mates speak highly of him. It's just you, and your tribe.

Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24874 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:11 am to
I thought the original post was BS. A worst drop rate of 5.5% seems about right.

Its all in the definition of drop I guess. I could be running down the field full blast and have the pass thrown too early and hit my back heel with a defender tearing my arm off and my dad would ask me why I dropped that pass.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111465 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:13 am to
quote:

NFL's drop chart for 2016 -
Worst drop-rate in the NFL - 5.5%
Worst drop-rate in SEC - 25.3% (according to CFB) LOL



You just compared drop rate to percentage of incompletions



And multiple people fricking agreed with you. Our fan base is so freaking stupid
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 9:14 am
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:14 am to
quote:

There was also a stat study by same site regarding LSU lack of YAC that you don't seem to have near as much issue with.

As soon as it was posted, I said I give no credence to any CFB stat. Anonymous dudes on an anonymous unverified clickbait site.
Posted by madddoggydawg
Metairie
Member since Jun 2013
6706 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 9:14 am to
I knew the receivers sucked!
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram