- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:25 pm to azcatiger
quote:
"10 days?![]()
So I guess it's a foregone conclusion JJ might not play against Oregon?"
Yes 100% he "MIGHT"
chill
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:25 pm to LsuTool
quote:
What good will it do to get 10 more interviews?
That would take until September 4th to complete.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:25 pm to seeLSUrun
quote:
this is unconfirmed but ive heard it was a camera
from someone in the bar? a camera at the bar? camera phone?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:26 pm to LsuTool
quote:
IMO, interviewing 10 more half drunk kids isint gonna turn up any new evidence that they havent already heard over and over.
Probably right, irrelevant though
This is how all investigations are run. There's a 2nd degree battery charge at stake here and things better be done right
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:26 pm to The Truth 34
quote:
yea, i've seen fights in tigerland end with arrests on the spot or the parties being sent home.
ive been screaming this since day 1! there are fights almost every night in TL and elsewhere around LSU and it very, very rarely goes past the parking lot or drunk tank
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:26 pm to jrodLSUke
This is turning into a huge distraction, I have serious doubts we'll beat Oregon now. No telling how divided the locker is over this due to lies.
This post was edited on 8/23/11 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:26 pm to The Truth 34
quote:
from someone in the bar? a camera at the bar? camera phone?
yes
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:26 pm to The Truth 34
quote:
yea, i've seen fights in tigerland end with arrests on the spot or the parties being sent home.
end of story.
yeah, no kidding, and people of other schools are insinuating the athletes are getting preferential treatment. you think BRPD would give a flying frick about this if it was a bunch of random people fighting? i've never seen someone charged for a bar fight after the fact, and especially have never seen a 2 week investigation on one where unless someone was put in critical condition or something.
This post was edited on 8/23/11 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:27 pm to munchman
quote:
TEAM SWEEP....In the old days, false prophets were stoned
it ain't over til its over
quote:
Maybe in 2011 we could just put the boot to their heads.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:27 pm to lsufball19
quote:
if you hit someone, all they have to prove is intent to harm. if intent to harm is there, you're liable for the total damage caused. you can't say, "i just meant to bust his lip, not break his jaw," doesn't work that way. you'd also be liable if you swung at someone with intent to harm, missed, and connected with someone else by accident.
Even if done in self defense?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:27 pm to seeLSUrun
quote:
yes
thanks for the inside info, cum stain.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:27 pm to Lagrange Gator
quote:
Dammit Boy!
Bottom half is even finer than the top half!!!!!
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:27 pm to Choctaw
Team Sweep has swept the wrong leg.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:28 pm to deuce985
It's safe to say the focus is not on Oregon....
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:28 pm to TigerKnights
quote:
Man, you gotta get curb stomped damn hard to fracture some vertebrae. Holy crap!
You think ALL the injuries happened to one guy? The marine that was supposedly kicked isn't the one with cracked vertebrae right?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:28 pm to The Truth 34
quote:
thanks for the inside info, sex god
your mom been talking about me again? and you're quite welcome
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:29 pm to Festus
quote:
Even if done in self defense?
self defense wasn't what he was implying. he was implying that if he hit him and he fell as a result, which caused him to crack his vertebrae. he didn't intend on him falling and didn't actively try to break his back, so he wouldn't be liable. that isn't true.
Posted on 8/23/11 at 4:29 pm to The Truth 34
quote:
thanks for the inside info, cum stain.
It was a joke from the beginning. Don't get mad cause it went over your head.
Popular
Back to top


1







