Started By
Message

re: Booger McFarland and his issues with us?

Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:03 am to
Posted by 1badboy
In space
Member since Jul 2014
8103 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:03 am to
I wish Paul Finebaum would learn not to hang on Sabans balls so much so he could see other teams in the SEC.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 9:04 am
Posted by KLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
10319 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:03 am to
Would Wisconsin beat?

TAMU: No
Bama: No
LSU: No
Ole Miss: No
Miss St: ??
Arkansas: Yes
Auburn: No
UGA: No
UF: ??
USC: ??
Vandy: Yes
UT: ??
UK: ??
Missouri: ??

Best they would do in the SEC is 7th but could be down as far as 12th. Booger just took the average and seems like a fair assessment to me.
Posted by Tiger Voodoo
Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!
Member since Mar 2007
21785 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:04 am to
quote:

So here is what he actually said.

 "The offensive line is not as good as advertised...or at least not on Saturday."

So if you play the whole quote he said exactly what you thought he should basically.


And there it is

So much bullshite can be avoided if people would actually LISTEN, instead of hearing what they want to hear. And others blindly aaccept a "quote" and run with it.

Earth is one giant fricked up game of telephone. And the Rant is the center of the Earth.



quote:

damn you know its bad if dari nowkhah (sp) owns you. 



No shite. He is truly awful.
Posted by im4LSU
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2004
32017 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:04 am to
quote:

What is this guys issue with LSU? Just seems is is always bashing LSU every chance he can. He was just on with Culotta and Prince. "LSU offensive line is not as good as advertised". "Wisconsin would finish 9th if in the SEC"



ummmm.....


so where was he wrong?
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96018 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:05 am to
quote:

So much bullshite can be avoided if people would actually LISTEN, instead of hearing what they want to hear. And others blindly aaccept a "quote" and run with it.



i was listening to the interview and i didnt hear the part about "or at least not on saturday". I wasnt listening all that closely though to be honest.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29311 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:05 am to
quote:

do you have a link to this?


I doubt the podcast is up yet but I heard on 104.5 a little less than an hour ago in my car.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96018 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:06 am to
word i'll check the podcast in a bit.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:16 am to
quote:

LSU played without it's starting veteran center. he'll be back saturday IMO and the line will look much different.


The line will look much different if Jennings keeps throwing the ball like he did in the second half Saturday night. If teams are going to stack the box with 8-9 players and we keep running straight into the teeth of it like we did for the first 2+ quarters against Wisconsin, no OL is going to look good regardless of personnel. Right or wrong, our opponents do not respect our passing game right now, and they are going to stack the box on us until Jennings proves he can make them pay for it. On Saturday night, he did that. If he keeps doing it, teams will stop stacking the box and our OL will do fine.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67591 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:18 am to
quote:

If teams are going to stack the box with 8-9 players and we keep running straight into the teeth of it like we did for the first 2+ quarters against Wisconsin, no OL is going to look good regardless of personnel


defenses defend formations...coaches call the formations...LSU finally spread the field and Wisconsin went to a nickel package...we were able to run out of the shotgun
Posted by Phil2012
The planet
Member since Dec 2005
6213 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:19 am to
Why not just say,"they have a couple of new guys and it was their 1st game together, but they did seem to gel in the last quarter...the OL needs a couple of games to really build chemistry"////
Posted by SaintLSUnAtl
THE REAL MJ
Member since Jan 2007
22129 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:23 am to
Is he not supposed to state facts just b/c he went to LSU?

Offensive line struggled early

Wisconsin did nothing to show they would be a premier SEC team
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57466 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:27 am to
quote:

LSU played without it's starting veteran center.
he'll be back saturday IMO and the line will look much different.

you do know Les came out last week and said Posic would start over Porter.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57466 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Ole Miss: No
did you even watch the Ole miss game?
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96018 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:31 am to
quote:

you do know Les came out last week and said Posic would start over Porter.



its an interesting question. Did he start because he beat him out, or because Porter was suspended. Toss up imo.
Posted by milton01
THE BOOT
Member since Aug 2006
1603 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:32 am to
I agree with him, especially with the first half
Posted by Nissanmaxima
Member since Feb 2006
14928 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:35 am to
quote:

"The offensive line is not as good as advertised...or at least not on Saturday."




Yeah please check word for word because I might be losing my mind. I am pretty sure he came back with that statement right before the interview ended. Look it was not just with this interview but to me it seems that Booger has always had some shaky things to say about LSU when given the chance. No I don't have any links just from listening to talk radio in the past years.

Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:40 am to
quote:

They even had to get on him last week when referring to LSU as "us" when talking about the LSU-Wisconsin game.


See, that's BS. I find sports analysts more interesting when they're allowed to wear their allegiances on their sleeve.

Now all we get is a ton of "devil's advocate" opinions from them because they don't really believe what they're saying totally.

I know they do that for the casual fan though and not the diehards because they know we'll watch regardless.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 9:43 am
Posted by justustm2
Member since Sep 2005
4158 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:42 am to
Well the OL was advertised as one of the best in the nation. Did they play like it? Nuff said.

And what's with the Nazi mind control thing some on here have? Booger has the right to express his opinion. People who love LSU have the right to say what they see as an improvement area for the team. That doesn't make them a hater of the team. That doesn't mean they have "issues" with LSU. It most times mean they love the Tigers and want to see them improve.
Posted by Nissanmaxima
Member since Feb 2006
14928 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:46 am to
Would Wisconsin beat?

TAMU: No
Bama: No
LSU: No
Ole Miss: No
Miss St: ??
Arkansas: Yes
Auburn: No
UGA: No
UF: ??
USC: ??
Vandy: Yes
UT: ??
UK: ??
Missouri: ??



Serious?


Would Wisconsin beat?

TAMU: Who knows toss up
Bama: "Same"
LSU: "Came damn close"
Ole Miss: Yes
Miss St: Yes
Arkansas: Yes
Auburn: Who knows toss up
UGA: No
UF: Yes
USC: Yes
Vandy: Yes
UT: Yes
UK: Yes
Missouri: Yes
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38410 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:47 am to
quote:

"LSU offensive line is not as good as advertised"

This could be very possible.

quote:

"Wisconsin would finish 9th if in the SEC"

That is possible, but doubtful.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram