Started By
Message

re: Best Defensive attack against GT

Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:19 pm to
Posted by factor67
Member since Jan 2005
175 posts
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:19 pm to
4-3,4-2-5,4-4 are all pretty close. It just maters on what assignment you give to each player. If you run a 3-3 , you better have a MAN at nose. If your noseguard is singled blocked by the center,it will be a long night.
Posted by tjohn deaux
GA
Member since Feb 2007
10392 posts
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:20 pm to
Regardless of the scheme we need to play run first, tight pass coverage, pressure the QB at all times, and make them beat us consistantly with the deep ball before we change anything.

ETA: I'm no defensive coordinator, but I guess neither is/are what we've had.
This post was edited on 12/8/08 at 12:25 pm
Posted by ctalati32
Member since Sep 2007
4068 posts
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

make them beat us consistently with the deep ball before we change anything.


well any pass that GT will throw will be a mid-deep ball. There aren't many slants or short level throws (aside from screens). But passes seem to be behind the LoS or past the first down marker.
Posted by tjohn deaux
GA
Member since Feb 2007
10392 posts
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:29 pm to
I don't know alot about GT, but it sounds like they have a strong running attack, so our only hope is to try and take away what they do best and out score them.
Posted by GoldenTornado
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2008
36 posts
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:32 pm to
quote:


4-3,4-2-5,4-4 are all pretty close. It just maters on what assignment you give to each player. If you run a 3-3 , you better have a MAN at nose. If your noseguard is singled blocked by the center,it will be a long night.


Agreed. MSU tried basically a 3 man front with nose head up on center and the ends in 4- and 5-techs or thereabouts, and they got crushed.

VT put two DT's in the A-gaps and clogged the middle, and they completely took away the dive and also made mesh turnovers risky.

GT eventually adjusted and the ball well on the perimeter, we had about 285 rushing and 385 total yards and outgained VT by 50%, but with a -3 turnover ratio we ended up losing a tight game.

FSU tried the VT approach and got shredded like a senator's tax returns until Nesbitt sprained his ankle late in the third (a GT OL fell on it at a bad angle).
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram