Started By
Message

re: Am I the only one who finds it strange that they took JJ's DNA...

Posted on 8/27/11 at 10:39 pm to
Posted by luvitrleve
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2011
275 posts
Posted on 8/27/11 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

for an assault that resulted in all parties being treated and released from the hospital. I understand if there was a death...but I've got to think that DNA evidence is rarely if ever collected for assaults (outside of sexual assaults). It's time consuming..and expensive. Was DNA collected simply b/c of the celebrity status of those involved?


To exclude him if any DNA was found on his shoes. No mystery there move on
Posted by A75CADDY
BatonRouge, LA
Member since Nov 2010
415 posts
Posted on 8/27/11 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

wheelz007
quote:

There is a piece to this that hasn't been discussed, I don't think.

The victim's attorney was contacted the Friday after the fight, and got involved.

I'm sure he spent the entire weekend talking to witnesses and doing his own investigation....collecting info, etc.

He said during his radio interview with Deke and Bobby that there were "many, many witnesses that came forward".

I mean, would you go after the starting QB for a major D1 school in your own town, knowing you could seriously derail a shot at a BCS NC....

unless you had a pretty solid case?


He also still asserts that Lowery was not in the club although there is video evidence and eyewitness accounts that place him in the club.

He also asserts that Lowery does not know the other 3 victims. If so how did they get together and get the same attorney. We don't even know who the other 3 guys are?
Posted by EricB
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
1680 posts
Posted on 8/27/11 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

I never said he was innocent or anything was unfair. Why you attacking me on this?


Since the arrest has been made, well, actually, since it was looking like they had enough evidence to make the arrest (before then it was nothing but cries of innocence), there has been numerous new threads that all claim one of the following things:

1.) BRPD sucks -
1a - they put too much attention into this
1b - they are 'grand standing' ie calling public press conferences just for camera time (when they would have been insulted for not doing this
1c - they are only listening to one side of the story
1d - they :gasp: put resources behind this to help solve it, but this is bad because of all those 'unsolved' murders out there... which is remarkable because you have to be a serious mental reject to suggest that they should stop working on a current case (which is the most important time to gather evidence) and go work on a cold case that might be of a more severe crime.

I can't begin to fathom how someone could suggest that they give up a case that they have many leads on - and witnesses of a felony level and go start looking into a dead body they found in the ditch a few weeks / months ago in a very low income neighborhood in which people traditionally are known for not telling police a damn thing.
2.) The "victims" aren't victims at all! They should be called -- "they shady 4" -- ok fellas -- a. this isn't Fox News and b.) no one doubts that they are freaking scum bags who probably started the altercation but c.) it doesn't take a brain surgeon to know not to kick someone in the head while they are already incapacitated on the ground when D.) EVERYONE KNOWS WHO YOU ARE.
3.) The media is making JJ / LSU out to look terrible -- I agree, but there isn't anything we can do about this except maybe stop calling into Mascona and voicing the same bs over and over again when he brings this topic up -- ps i like Mascona but he really did sell out hard core the other day and attack the police -- which i can't fathom how hard this must be on them.
4.) Racial profiling / racism - pathetic. if one of the players really tweeted this, which he did, i hope he's running all over tiger stadium... it's one thing to really assume this over every little thing, but it's another thing to misrepresent your team by making your ignorant opinion public -- ps -- its racist to claim racial profiling every time an african american is arrested, especially when a.) a caucasion was arrested too and b.) you don't hear any whites screaming that this was a hate crime, despite all victims (or the shady 4 for our over emotional 'team sweepers') being white.

Basically, we've gone over this over and over. I think its certainly made some of us dislike others on this board on a personal level simply because the nature of this topic is an emotional one and it really tests the differences in peoples ideologies. I think its an inflamatory topic, but theres freedom of speech but i think people shouldn't have to sift through jj topics to find something about lsu football.

quote:

asserts
insinuates maybe, but who cares.
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 10:50 pm
Posted by Rittdog
Yesterday, all my troubles seemed
Member since Oct 2009
9955 posts
Posted on 8/27/11 at 11:15 pm to
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 8/27/11 at 11:29 pm to
It is because the person who kicked the guy on the ground also spit on him. They need to match the spit to the kicker. Also, the shoes have nothing to do with the DNA test.
This post was edited on 8/27/11 at 11:32 pm
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 8/27/11 at 11:46 pm to
I understand your frustration with the ongoing bs threads questioning decisions made by all involved. Since you are responding to me can you look through my post history and find one thread I started or a post where I did any of the things you listed? If anything I have tried to clear up confusion. Some people seem to be misinformed on how criminal investigations are conducted and I was just trying to clear that up.
Posted by tc5140
Member since Jul 2009
782 posts
Posted on 8/27/11 at 11:55 pm to
Don't you think maybe they asked JJ which ones he wore then confirmed them. JJ would not lie once they entered his home and took every pair.
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
48850 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:01 am to
quote:

The BRPD wanted to make damn sure he was involved before making the arrest.


quote:

It would be unbelievably bad for them if they arrested him and it was shown that he wasn't involved

So you know for a fact that this is why he was arrested?
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:31 am to
I see EricB is still up in here showing his arse. He's acting like this is his own personal victory. Truth is the only thing the actual arrest did was end JJ's football career. It absolutely does not mean he is guilty even if it appears that way right now. The DA hasn't even reviewed the case yet and won't for a few weeks. There's no way he accepts felony charges unless there is some better evidence than what has been shown. BRPD pushed this warrant to get it off their shoulders due to the bad publicity they started getting. I expect things to get way worse for them and the accusers once Ungelsby starts to do what he do. I'm talking serious consequences for how this went down. They better be real sure they know what they're getting into.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:42 am to
Not sure if you're aware or not but the police don't need enough evidence to convict in order to make an arrest. All they need is enough probable cause.

Let me put it to you like this. It is the job of the investigator to gather facts pertaining to the case. He/she then presents these facts in the form of an affidavit to a judge. The judge reads this and makes a determination if there is enough to warrant an arrest. If there is the judge signs off on the affidavit and signs an arrest warrant. Judges have no problem turning down investigators seeking a warrant if they feel there isn't enough probable cause
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:48 am to
No shite, that's what I said. It's just funny to me that morons like EricB think that because JJ was arrested that he's automatically guilty of felony charges. In reality all it means is they had enough for probable cause which really doesn't take much. They've already admitted they think Long is a 3rd party witness and that grainy arse video is is what they handed over. Hillar won't accept these charges and Ungelsby is going to turn this into a nightmare for BRPD and the accusers.
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:51 am to
quote:

All they need is enough probable cause.
quote:

Judges have no problem turning down investigators seeking a warrant if they feel there isn't enough probable cause
Enough probable cause?

Probable cause just means a "reasonable belief" that Jefferson committed a crime.

That's it. Reasonable belief. Nothing more.

It doesn't require physical evidence. It doesn't require the cop to have personal knowledge of the facts.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296006 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:56 am to
quote:

I was thinking the same. I think BRPD is auditioning for the next season of CSI. I think we both know it was the celebrity staus.


It's high profile, and the BRPD can only risk looking like rookies by not doing enough. It's just people covering their arse so when future career positions open elsewhere it doesn't show up as incompetent police work.
Posted by Nick Cest Bon
Covington
Member since Jan 2004
388 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 12:58 am to
I have never heard of DNA samples in a battery case. It's like fingerprinting for a littering violation. But, JJ got screwed because it was a high profile investigation. I think their first lawyer screwed this up by delaying the interrogation
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:01 am to
quote:

LSUdm21
I think you missed my point. Maybe I worded it wron. My bad. What I was getting at is how could you think it will be so bad for BRPD if JJ is found not guilt? Many times police arrest people that are found to be not guilty. If I'm still missing your point I apologize.

Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:08 am to
You've never heard of DNA in a battery case because it didn't involve the LSU qb.

DNA is a case by case issue. I know of a case that was a bar fight involving a large group of people in a parking lot. Someone received injuries that required medical treatment. Was a case where nobody saw anything. A bloody shirt was found and sent for DNA analysis. Once locating this person they couldn't deny their involvement and ultimately led to identifying a suspect and in the end a confession.

Just an example to maybe help you understand
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
48850 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:14 am to
JJ for President!

Never spit on people ..its just rude.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:18 am to
Spitting is heavily frowned upon in my house fwiw. Doesn't stop it from happening though
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65134 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:19 am to
DNA only proves he had contact with someone. It doesn't tell a story. It doesn't explain how it got there. It doesn't explain 2nd degree battery. OK, JJ was there...See... DNA not needed. I could have saved them some money. Its like your semen in a women, doesn't prove you raped her(got off on that charge...j/k).
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
48850 posts
Posted on 8/28/11 at 1:21 am to
quote:

got off on that charge...j/k).

I see what you did there
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram