- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:29 am to GeorgeTheGreek
Yes, but the offensive philosophy is basically the same
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:30 am to PinevilleTiger
quote:
What do you think the AD and fans would do to Saban if he promoted his bubba OL coach OC? No, wait, Saban wouldn't be that big of a DUMBASS!
+1
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:31 am to Cosmo
So?
The overall scheme is similar but the playcalling and execution is terrible.
You can't really separate that out.
The overall scheme is similar but the playcalling and execution is terrible.
You can't really separate that out.
This post was edited on 1/1/13 at 11:33 am
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:33 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yep, their passing offense is light years ahead of LSU's. Not even close.
Yep.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:35 am to DallasTiger
What works for Bama is play action, working the TE into offense passing game, they make you account for the entire field with big receivers who stretch the field, so they are more creative than what people think.
LSU on the other hand LSU is the only team I have seen who's play action fools no one. Rarely uses screen passes, never uses TE, uses slant routes as primary way to move ball, long developing passing plays, and the creativity lacks from top to bottom, then you throw in the bad play calling and we get a performance like last night.
The one good about the game last night will make Les bring in an offensive coordinator who is creative for next season and we won't be hollering how bad our offense is at the start of next season and just about each week.
LSU on the other hand LSU is the only team I have seen who's play action fools no one. Rarely uses screen passes, never uses TE, uses slant routes as primary way to move ball, long developing passing plays, and the creativity lacks from top to bottom, then you throw in the bad play calling and we get a performance like last night.
The one good about the game last night will make Les bring in an offensive coordinator who is creative for next season and we won't be hollering how bad our offense is at the start of next season and just about each week.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:36 am to Cosmo
philosophy is similar...only Bama has actual coordination and game planning to make the philosophy work
it's called COACHING
it's called COACHING
This post was edited on 1/1/13 at 11:38 am
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:37 am to RogerTheShrubber
It's hard to watch. I still say that LSU has to have top 20 talent offensively( that is conservative). So either all the offensive talent we recruit are overrated or the coaching/scheme sucks. I am going with the coaching sucks.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:37 am to tigertown79
quote:
The one good about the game last night will make Les bring in an offensive coordinator who is creative
Lol
Weve been saying this for years, aint happening.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:37 am to Cosmo
quote:
Yes, but the offensive philosophy is basically the same
Their offensive plays are infinitely more mature than ours. Watch how they develop and are set up.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:38 am to RogerTheShrubber
But, their execution is superb.......
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:38 am to loustuni
quote:
Execution
/thread
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:38 am to RogerTheShrubber
But, their execution is superb.......
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:39 am to loustuni
quote:
Execution
/thread
Posted on 1/1/13 at 11:39 am to TheBaker
LSU could run a simpleton offense if we had any reasonable passing threat at all that was somewhat consistent. We don't. Teams play us to run because they know that is our only effective threat.
There's a huge difference in a simple offense and an ineffective one. With our defense we don't need to be flashy like some other teams.
There are schools out there who run a "simple" offense with less talent than LSU has and is much more effective at it.
Even if we had a reasonable pass threat it doesn't matter if you play call like last night and can't manage a few rushing attempts while leading the game and wanting to run the clock down and rest the defense. Passing just played into what Clemson wanted us to do.
There's a huge difference in a simple offense and an ineffective one. With our defense we don't need to be flashy like some other teams.
There are schools out there who run a "simple" offense with less talent than LSU has and is much more effective at it.
Even if we had a reasonable pass threat it doesn't matter if you play call like last night and can't manage a few rushing attempts while leading the game and wanting to run the clock down and rest the defense. Passing just played into what Clemson wanted us to do.
This post was edited on 1/1/13 at 11:42 am
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News