- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 8-4 (after 3 games prediction)
Posted on 9/21/09 at 5:22 am to LSU Slacker
Posted on 9/21/09 at 5:22 am to LSU Slacker
I think we're 3-0 and a much better team than what I saw on the field last year. If that's any indication on how we will finish, I will say we will finish with more wins than the previous season. If that dissapoints you, then you need to find another team to root for............good luck finding that.
0
Posted on 9/21/09 at 5:43 am to LSUfonte
For the so called fan that started this thread, they will not graduate from college, that is if they are even in college,..they will never get a decent job,..they will be poor for the first twenty years of their adult life....see how easy it is to be so negative,..if you live thinking this way, that is the result you will get...
Posted on 9/21/09 at 6:11 am to LSUfonte
How in the hell can you tell? Nothing has been conclusive so far as to how this team performs other than the fact that there was a little bit of improvement week to week and the competition to start the season was just a tad bit stronger than usual. I just don't see how people can look at LSU right now and automatically assume that we're gonna lose to all the SEC teams that are ranked. I've seen worse LSU teams go into Tuscaloosa and win. Remember 1993? I've seen worse LSU teams beat Auburn that was better then than now (1988, 1995). I've seen worse LSU teams beat Arkansas (1999).
Cut it with this crap. To try to make an assumption about how LSU is going to play in the SEC is completely ridiculous based on what you've seen so far. I wonder if you're even old enough to have watched any of the games I mentioned above in the first place.
Cut it with this crap. To try to make an assumption about how LSU is going to play in the SEC is completely ridiculous based on what you've seen so far. I wonder if you're even old enough to have watched any of the games I mentioned above in the first place.
Posted on 9/21/09 at 7:01 am to RT58
quote:
and imo,match us with speed and agility.miles has recruited exceptional
imo,LSU is superior to Bama with speed and agility.miles has recruited exceptional.
Dont get too far ahead of yourself. You may match us in this category in a couple years, but not yet.
The D is steadily improving, the O-line still needs work, and JJ has only started 5 games.
Oh, and Shep. will give everyone we play fits when they finally fake it him and hit a reciever deep.
Posted on 9/21/09 at 7:14 am to PiscesTiger
quote:
Arkansas...L 31-36
I expect a 45-21 beat down of arky.
their defense is T-E-R-R-I-B-L-E
quote:
Auburn...L 28-34
again, the defense is HORRID
quote:
at Alabama...L 10-28
maybe...
but I think this team could score at least 21 points on anyone.
Posted on 9/21/09 at 7:42 am to LSU Slacker
Here's a tip: Go outside.
Posted on 1/7/10 at 3:06 am to LSUfonte
quote:
LSU is staring 8-4 right in the face. (hope I am wrong)
After three games, what say you......
damn
Posted on 1/7/10 at 3:29 am to TheDoc
Dude is Nostradamus
Posted on 1/7/10 at 3:56 am to TheDoc
we finished 9-3
Posted on 1/7/10 at 6:15 am to Slinger16
quote:
Dude is Nostradamus
except this dude was wrong
Posted on 1/7/10 at 8:51 am to startshepard
quote:
we finished 9-3
Lost to Florida, Bama, Ole Miss, Penn St
which is four losses
Posted on 1/7/10 at 8:52 am to d6k
Arkansas was an OT win, close to 5 losses again.
Posted on 1/7/10 at 11:00 am to LSUfonte
There are a lot of shallow, totally void of content posts in this thread.
Most people rather than rebutting the OP with logical arguments, called him names, and made vile predictions for his future, just because they didn't like what he wrote.
THAT is what is wrong with this board, if anything. That there are a large number of people whose response to a differing opinion is "your an idiot", "you suck at life", or "you will never graduate college" (this one takes the cake).
That type of argumentative strategy, called an ad-hominem (Latin for against the man) attack shows the lack of logic, and a person who refuses to consider that their view might not be absolutely correct and feels threatened when confronted with that possibility.
This is a favorite tactic of TV pundits, whom I suppose a lot of you watch regularly, again based the way many folks respond to differing opinions here.
Those of you who attacked the OP, how smart do you feel now?
I really don't give a frick what you think about me so flame away and prove me right.
All of the attacking, no-content posts makes the Rant look, well, really low class and uneducated -- incapable of reasoned debate or discussion. Like cavemen bashing each other over the head with sticks and grunting. It reflects poorly on the institution and this board. Whether you like it or not.
Please Ranters, why not attempt to elevate your games and answer a fricking post without calling a the poster names or insulting his lineage?
It's really not that hard.
Most people rather than rebutting the OP with logical arguments, called him names, and made vile predictions for his future, just because they didn't like what he wrote.
THAT is what is wrong with this board, if anything. That there are a large number of people whose response to a differing opinion is "your an idiot", "you suck at life", or "you will never graduate college" (this one takes the cake).
That type of argumentative strategy, called an ad-hominem (Latin for against the man) attack shows the lack of logic, and a person who refuses to consider that their view might not be absolutely correct and feels threatened when confronted with that possibility.
This is a favorite tactic of TV pundits, whom I suppose a lot of you watch regularly, again based the way many folks respond to differing opinions here.
Those of you who attacked the OP, how smart do you feel now?
I really don't give a frick what you think about me so flame away and prove me right.
All of the attacking, no-content posts makes the Rant look, well, really low class and uneducated -- incapable of reasoned debate or discussion. Like cavemen bashing each other over the head with sticks and grunting. It reflects poorly on the institution and this board. Whether you like it or not.
Please Ranters, why not attempt to elevate your games and answer a fricking post without calling a the poster names or insulting his lineage?
It's really not that hard.
Posted on 1/7/10 at 11:16 am to los angeles tiger
quote:
Arkansas was an OT win, close to 5 losses again.
Naw, if we lose to them, we win a lesser bowl game. Still 9-4.
Posted on 1/7/10 at 11:59 am to WNCTiger
quote:
Like cavemen bashing each other over the head with sticks and grunting
I couldn't resist!!! Actually I agree. People need to come up with a better way of disagreeing, other than "you're an idiot".
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News