Started By
Message

122 Clueless Voters

Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:56 pm
Posted by Scorpio58
Da Bayou
Member since Oct 2020
506 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:56 pm
Looking at the results, 122 out of 928 Heisman voters did not have JD5 1, 2 or 3 on their ballot. Hard to believe that these people are not paying attention to what is going on in college football and have an input on this award. I can understand voting Pennix or Nix before JD5 on the ballot, but leaving him off completely makes no sense.
Posted by Sull
Benton, LA
Member since Aug 2006
3270 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:57 pm to
They were trying to let their favorite win
Posted by NorthshoreTiger76
Pelicans, Saints, & LSU Fan
Member since May 2009
80160 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:57 pm to
They voted months ago
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8621 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:57 pm to
Intentionally done.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19265 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:57 pm to
37 voters did not have Burrow on either their 1st, 2nd, or 3rd ballots.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11145 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:57 pm to
That means they were trying to get their favorite guy to win, instead of voting for top 3.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84642 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

They voted months ago


They don’t have the ballots until late in November.
Posted by TFS4E
Washington DC
Member since Nov 2008
13128 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:58 pm to
There were 37 un-tabulated ballots, I assume that’s included in there. Now they should lose their vote for either not voting or not following protocol
Posted by roguetiger15
Member since Jan 2013
16151 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:00 pm to
Those are the mail in ballots
Posted by the crue
Chackbay-Thibodaux
Member since May 2008
3967 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:01 pm to
just like for the baseball hall of fame, just only rivera i believe is the only person to be voted with 100% of votes
Posted by lsutigertalk
At Death Valley
Member since Apr 2004
5472 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

37 voters did not have Burrow on either their 1st, 2nd, or 3rd ballots.

Their votes should have been taken away.
Posted by Blutarsky
112th Congress
Member since Jan 2004
9552 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

They were trying to let their favorite win


If it’s non-Heisman winners, you pull their vote and give it to someone else.
Posted by Hoovertigah
Fayetteville
Member since Sep 2013
3037 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:03 pm to
They should be considered for their bias and have their vote removed. Fukers
Posted by eugene1928LSU
Shreveport, La
Member since Oct 2013
2780 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:05 pm to
Yes, it asine on some of these people that have a vote.
Posted by Quatrepot
Member since Jun 2023
4032 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

you pull their vote and give it to someone else.


So if they vote differently than most see, take away their right to vote?
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16383 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:10 pm to
JD should've been a unanimous winner. That he wasn't comments more on the clowns given votes than his play on the fields of CFB.
Posted by Curtis Lowe
Member since Dec 2019
1260 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:17 pm to
4% or 37 ballots were not tabulated in the final count by Deloitte for whatever reason (either incomplete ballot, ballot not cast or ballot received late).
Posted by Blutarsky
112th Congress
Member since Jan 2004
9552 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

So if they vote differently than most see, take away their right to vote?


..because they are trying to help a specific player win it by keeping 1 player out of the T4 who deserves it.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17528 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:20 pm to
Is that received ballots? There were about 40 or so that were not received.
This post was edited on 12/9/23 at 9:23 pm
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
19496 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:22 pm to

If Daniels was left off of a ballot, it was an intentional omission.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram