- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Who was there more anticipation for Zach Lee or Mett ?
Posted on 11/21/10 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 11/21/10 at 11:04 pm
If mett turns us down too i think we will be fricked similar to the situation we've been in, in the 2 previous years 

Posted on 11/21/10 at 11:07 pm to ItsThatDude12
Mett, not even close. Only player that might have been discussed more on this board is Seastrunk. At least from what I can remember.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 11:11 pm to ZTiger87
Mett, as far as anticipation. The futher we go without a solid pipeline, the bigger each recruits grows in stature.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 11:11 pm to ItsThatDude12
Because there was so much anticipation for Lee, Mett has taken on that plus his own. It's gotten to the point that if he doesn't win a Heisman he's a disappointment for a solid 50% of this board.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 11:15 pm to ZTiger87
quote:
Mett, not even close.
this
Posted on 11/21/10 at 11:16 pm to ZTiger87
idk broham there were about 10 threads started about zach lee per day, regardless if this dude passes on us like Lee did it was be terrible 

Posted on 11/22/10 at 8:27 am to LSU2014
quote:
It's gotten to the point that if he doesn't win a Heisman he's a disappointment for a solid 50% of this board.
stupdiest post on this board ever. No one is expecting him to win the heisman u idiot. Other than the 2nd half against Bama and the ole miss game our qb have been terrible. We just néed mett to come in here and be able to throw the ball to our receivers and win us games not win in spite of our QB's.
Posted on 11/22/10 at 8:29 am to LSU2014
quote:
It's gotten to the point that if he doesn't win a Heisman he's a disappointment for a solid 50% of this board.
I don't think that's the case... but I don't think that people are expecting him to come in and be average either (assuming JJ and JL are below average)
If he doesn't perform at least as well as Aaron Murray, that's when the disappointment may come on.
Posted on 11/22/10 at 8:45 am to baytiger
quote:
If he doesn't perform at least as well as Aaron Murray, that's when the disappointment may come on.
Well he's got a pretty high standard to live up to then.
Posted on 11/22/10 at 9:19 am to baytiger
quote:
I don't think that's the case... but I don't think that people are expecting him to come in and be average either (assuming JJ and JL are below average)
Ahh, perhaps I got it confused with the rant. I'm very pleased with the way Jordan's been playing so I think he'll get some time next year before taking the starting role in 2012.
Didn't mean to stir up the good folk of the recruiting board

Posted on 11/22/10 at 9:21 am to WG_Dawg
quote:I wasn't denying that, but a Heisman is overstating.
Well he's got a pretty high standard to live up to then.
Murray's going to be a hell of a QB over there.
Posted on 11/22/10 at 12:04 pm to ItsThatDude12
I can say it's close. Both Mett and Lee were/have been made out to be the savior of the program. If Mett does not come here the program will survive. No one player makes a program. If Mett does not want to be here in the end then we don't want him anyway.
Posted on 11/22/10 at 12:45 pm to peopleschamp
Saw him on up close when I was down on the sidelines...dude had a monster dip in haha
Posted on 11/22/10 at 12:59 pm to ZTiger87
quote:
Mett, not even close. Only player that might have been discussed more on this board is Seastrunk. At least from what I can remember.
See: Joe McKnight 2007
Posted on 11/22/10 at 5:21 pm to ItsThatDude12
Lee was more tension because we knew that the Dodgers were going to offer millions and NONE of us would turn down MILLIONS to play for good old LSU.
Mett has no other options.
And he conveniently has 3 years left. So...
next year JJ starts, and in 2012, Mett can start. Meanwhile Rivers can redshirt next year and be a backup when Mett starts. So will Barrett Bailey.
Mett has no other options.
And he conveniently has 3 years left. So...
next year JJ starts, and in 2012, Mett can start. Meanwhile Rivers can redshirt next year and be a backup when Mett starts. So will Barrett Bailey.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 2:37 am to ottothewise
Mett doesn't have a pro league offering him millions immediately ala Zach Lee or Zach Von Rosenberg..
One day he will.
One day he will.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 2:55 am to peopleschamp
quote:
I can say it's close. Both Mett and Lee were/have been made out to be the savior of the program.
I disagree. Most on here never thought Lee would make it to campus. Everyone was pretty sure he was going pro in baseball.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 5:57 am to ItsThatDude12
quote:
idk broham there were about 10 threads started about zach lee per day, regardless if this dude passes on us like Lee did it was be terrible
I think that was partly due to Miles haters smelling blood in the water. Most of them didn't even know who Zach Lee was as the season was approaching.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 9:56 am to ItsThatDude12
quote:
Who was there more anticipation for Zach Lee or Mett ?
Mett has had a longer drawn out anticipation. Lee wasn't talked about much until spring when he got to campus and then there was a thread every two seconds on here and on the rant. I'd say it's similar, but one was a flash in the pan for about six weeks and the other has been more drawn out over many months.
Posted on 11/23/10 at 10:18 am to ZTiger87
Much more for Mett. Knowing he was a serious competitor to start at Ga. means he'll be further along than Z Lee was. Also remember he just plays football, so there will be no worries about another sport "stealing" him away.
Popular
Back to top
