Started By
Message

re: Stereotyping A Recruit

Posted on 2/6/12 at 4:28 pm to
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
78551 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 4:28 pm to
Are we running a fricking Chili's or playing football? If he can play he can play, who gives a shite if he has tattoos.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116709 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 4:54 pm to
I'm going to express my ideas about tattoos and leave it. I'm a libertarian and you can do whatever you want with your body.

I've worked out in a gym with older guys for 30 years. Many were from WWII and are now dead. A lot had tattoos. Got some Vietnam vets still here. I've never met one who wasn't sorry that he got them. They all regret getting tattoos.

When my 2 kids were young I told them "People spend millions of dollars removing imperfections on their bodies. Why would you pay to put an imperfection on your body?"

My kids are in their 30s. No tats. My son married a girl with none. My daughter married a good guy with a small one on his lower leg. Covered by sock. He regrets it.

It doesn't mean that you are a bad person. Walt Disney was a chain smoker. It means you made a bad decision that you will regret.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 5:03 pm to
And I know at least a dozen people with tats that love them.

Posted by NEKCIHCUSL
backwoods
Member since Jan 2012
423 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 5:24 pm to
Do Jerry Sandusky,Catholic priests,jeffrey dahmer,hitler,ted bundy etc,have neck tats?
Posted by TigerAlum93
Member since Sep 2010
3229 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 5:52 pm to
I have seen the "deceptive speed" stereotype not so much with the white guys (although it comes up there!), but more with runners who have the long stride length as opposed to a high stride frequency. Some guys cover alot of ground with each stride and look slower than the guys that have their legs moving 120 MPH but aren't covering as much ground. But the truth is that the guy with the longer stride is eating up more ground and probably going faster.

Eric Dickerson was one who ran effortlessly, to me he had deceptive speed. Trindon Holiday LOOKED and WAS fast due to his high stride frequency.
Posted by jembeurt
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
8871 posts
Posted on 2/6/12 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

And I know at least a dozen people with tats that love them.

As do I. One guy I know got the notes to Beethoven's "Fur Elise" around his bicep. His daughters name is Elise and he was a band director.

quote:

NEKCIHCUSL


So apparently only people with Neck tats can be sadistic, grusome killers, pedophiles, and genocidal dictators?

I have no idea where you were trying to go with that.
This post was edited on 2/6/12 at 6:08 pm
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21322 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Tats are fine if they can be hidden with a sleeve. But if you have 2 QBs and can only take one, would you rather the guy who is clean cut or the one with ink covering his neck?


I want the guy that:

1) can read a defense and make a split second decision
2) can throw the ball on a line and hit WR on timing routes
3) can lead my team and have the confidence the offense when things are down.

I would give two shits about his tatoo's!!
Posted by KABoss02
Dallas
Member since Jul 2009
1366 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Disagree with tats from the neck up. When I see someone with neck tats, they deserve to be stereotyped


Agree completely. Just like the massive circle things in kids ears and facial pierciengs. No place in a professional environment IMO. Same way that I would look funny in a rap video or playing at HOF in a polo, slacks, and dress shoes. Highly visible tats and pierciengs are not part of a business professional culture....

On the field or on stage, go for it.
Posted by CougarBait
on catnip in a cougar's den
Member since Jun 2007
2021 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:32 am to
I'm not hiring some dude with a neck tat. I'm a professional and need my people to look like grownups with an education. Not some hood rat athlete who would be knocking off liquor stores if not for basketball or Chalmette trailor trash with a couple of different baby mamas. Because I care about my bottom line and not making some social statement. Fact is, qualified people don't look like that. You can say what if, but if grandma had nuts she would be grandpa. Get a haircut and try to look and act like a grown man with his shite together.

As for athletes, I couldn't care less. He is either going pro or going to be a fry cook serving me after a long night swilling martini's with the non-tattoo showing crowd. I won't care once he is through entertaining me.

This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 10:36 am
Posted by yallallcrazy
Member since Oct 2007
826 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:48 am to
Jumping in late here, but I tend to side with the " poor judgement" crowd.

My reasoning is that person intentionally did something that would limit his options in the future. Whether those limitations are "fair" or not is irrelevant.

Also tends to show that the individual in question cannot see himself as anything beyond what he currently is or thinks he is. Shows poor insight into future possibilities, which may translate into less hard work.

That said, if he could play QB better than the other guy, I'd still offer. In to OP scenario, I'm the coach and my job security is based on winning. If tats are the only thing--- no trouble with the law, etc-- then no problem
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 11:49 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram