- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "One of the greatest classes ever." - Les Miles
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
again, can you read?
quote:
"One of the greatest classes ever." - Les Miles
it is at LSU
1
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:09 am to Derby Tigah
quote:
WE LOST 5 GAMES THIS YEAR AND WE HAVE THE #1 CLASS
Dude your losing sight of the argument, read the fricking title of the thread
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
shep may be polished
crowton isn't really
This may be true to an extent, and hopefully having Shepard in Spring practice will be enough time to work with some of the backs (and maybe more importantly with the line).
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:09 am to Rouge
quote:
are we using an avg. star ranking created by those who have as much qualification as you or i?
Then is the statement made in the original topic just idiotic?
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
Hey, would if we finish out with Randle, somehow get Trent Richardson from Bama, and then steal back Debose from CUM.
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:10 am to Derby Tigah
quote:
do we ever get these?
you'd think in the greatest recruiting class of all time, we'd get at least 1
quote:
and none of them were from Louisiana
i don't think we'll ever have the greatest recruiting class in the history of mankind without some high 4s and 5s from out of state
quote:
Campbell, yes.. but who cares? he was probably an OL project at LSU anyway
um, he's still a 5-star lineman
quote:
Debose was a silent commit and we lost him to his home school which is probably the hottest school in the country to go to right now for a prospect like him... big fricking deal
we got out-recruited by UF when he was our's for a long, long time. that stung
quote:
WE LOST 5 GAMES THIS YEAR AND WE HAVE THE #1 CLASS
that still doesn't get into (1) our finish or (2) the rank of this class when compared to the best all time
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:11 am to Jsoula
quote:
Hey, would if we finish out with Randle, somehow get Trent Richardson from Bama, and then steal back Debose from CUM.
Wow. Now that's optimism.
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:11 am to Rouge
quote:
how would you classify the offense that crowton implemented with Dixon as QB at UO?
not that great and an offense that got a lot better when chip kelly took over control of it
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:11 am to Jsoula
This is simple. If we finish with the highest star average ever then its the best class ever. If we dont, then its not. Simple
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:12 am to Derby Tigah
quote:
it is at LSU
that's not what's being discussed
"greatest classes ever"
E-V-E-R
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:12 am to Choctaw
quote:
This is simple. If we finish with the highest star average ever then its the best class ever. If we dont, then its not. Simple
that doesn't account for depth really
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:12 am to Jsoula
quote:
Hey, would if we finish out with Randle, somehow get Trent Richardson from Bama, and then steal back Debose from CUM.
Remember in the move "Bruce Almighty" when the monkey came out of the guy's Arse? Well...that would happen in real life before your scenario happens...
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:13 am to SlowFlowPro
it got better when dixon matured. giving kelly all the credit is extremely short sighted, but you seem to be in a dramatic mood today so I'll let you run
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:13 am to LSU4lyfe
quote:
You may disagree but LSU held off on offering other RBs because we were full at RB with Ford and Pratt.
wrong, we just were very selective... we have been waiting on TR and would take him in a heartbeat ..with Lache next year and Hilliard the year after we can be selective and not take kids like Christine Michael, etc.
Who knows what the coaches were thinking with Pratt? I would bet they felt he was a good enought ATH with good enough size that if he could not make it at RB then he would project at a number of other positions including LB & TE.. not a bad assumption
Also, his stock dropped a lot through his senior season..that is a fact... I don't think he would have contributed significantly in our backfield
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:14 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
quote:
people said the same thing about ridley and he looks like our main back for 2010
Ford?
+1. Ford may not beat out Ridley but the kid is beyond legit'.
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
that doesn't account for depth really
Doesnt matter. recruiting classes arent ranked on depth.
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:15 am to BilJ
Again, if we grade classes based on meeting needs, then I think it's got to be at least a small disappointment if we don't get a prototypical pass-rushing end (and this does not include Mingo who would be a project at WDE at best). Ending without Montgomery (or Fletcher Cox... who was a real possibility early on) would be a disappointment to some extent.
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:15 am to BilJ
quote:
it got better when dixon matured. giving kelly all the credit is extremely short sighted
from what i've read, kelly simplified the offense and moved form a horizontally-based offense
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:15 am to Choctaw
quote:
Doesnt matter. recruiting classes arent ranked on depth.
yes they are
Posted on 1/18/09 at 11:16 am to Derby Tigah
I liked pratt, but bruisers like him aren't exactly hard to come by. Is he really that much better than singleton?
Page 5 of 12
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News