- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU will still land Boobie Feaster
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:21 pm to LSUFanMizeWay
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:21 pm to LSUFanMizeWay
Anything other than a Charger.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 9:44 am to TigaStyle4
He would round out this class very nicely with keys, feaster, Darby, and Anderson.
____________
Add Mack. We are taking 5 this year. 5 very good ones. Not a problem due to everyone we are losing at WR after the season.
____________
Add Mack. We are taking 5 this year. 5 very good ones. Not a problem due to everyone we are losing at WR after the season.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:22 pm to Phillytiger9
Any updates regarding this?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:53 am to TigaStyle4
I think the Mack commitment only effects Feaster NIL wise. With 4-4star WRs, LSU doesn't have to compete in a bidding war.
Mack is more of a Deebo Samuel player. We can line him up in multiple looks for the offense. I assume the conversation with the staff after Mack's commitment will be about the likelihood of Boobie playing as a 17yr old Freshman. That is one of the top priorites for him. If the Mack commitment doesn't change that, he is still in play.
Mack is more of a Deebo Samuel player. We can line him up in multiple looks for the offense. I assume the conversation with the staff after Mack's commitment will be about the likelihood of Boobie playing as a 17yr old Freshman. That is one of the top priorites for him. If the Mack commitment doesn't change that, he is still in play.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 12:36 am to Phillytiger9
This class is shaping up to be a real great one.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:38 am to Phillytiger9
Why does LSU need one of the '27 quarterbacks to reclassify to '26?
Posted on 3/29/25 at 8:35 am to BillF
They don't. That's just a scenario most, likely including the staff, recognize would benefit us the most. The reality is, regardless whether one of the 27 kids moves up a year into the 26 class, we will have to pay both and the chances are greater that both will transfer than both being here throughout their college career. I completely understand the sentiment and don't disagree but it's just much ado about nothing really. It's a perfect world scenario where we land 2 of the 27 kids and have a year of separation. We don't operate in a perfect world unfortunately. Just get the 1 we really want.
Posted on 3/29/25 at 10:18 am to Phillytiger9
quote:
LSU will still land Boobie Feaster
Our quarterbacks will have a buffet of choices. They will most certainly eat.
Posted on 3/30/25 at 7:58 am to grich31
quote:
Definitely need Peyton or Elijah to reclassify to 26 because LSU ain’t getting both
You likely aren’t getting both either way
Popular
Back to top
