re: LSU has topped out in its Easton Royal bid- won’t go higher.

quote:

---

That doesn’t tell the entire story and you know it if you watched the game.
Completely outcoached vs 2 inferior teams.

---

If you think Ole Miss was an "inferior" team, you don't know what you are talking about. I can't respect your opinion on anything if that's what you think.

give it a rest. you've made your opinion known - lsu should chase the easton royal sweepstakes as high as it'll go even to the detriment of filling out the rest of the roster & you're a better evaluator of talent than our current staff that's been universally praised for doing more with less for a while now. we now have 100+ posts copy / pasting the exact same thing.

quote:

---

Ole Miss is absolutely an inferior team. They have a good QB and RB and that’s it.

---

This is why your conclusion is off. You don't know the game.

Ole Miss is a very talented team. It's easily a top 10 team from a talent standpoint. Chambliss, Echols, Lacy, Alexander, Perkins are easily All SEC types and a some are All American level.

Name the All SEC type candidates LSU has.

quote:

---

Jones, Berry, Harris, green, weeks, dottery, spears, benefield, Pickett, Thomas, seatin, Geralds, princewill, and possibly woodland, though he’s inconsistent.

---

Okay so you haven’t watched Berry play, got it.

quote:

---

Would you say their evaluations of the current roster were good? You think it was money well spent?

---

i think it's fine all things considered. unless a coach is moving up in competition like cignetti and able to move an entire roster lock, stock, and barrel for market rate or cheaper, you're forced to overpay for year 1 of a huge rebuild. i also bet lsu to miss the playoffs in the preseason, so i already wasn't of the opinion that a $40m roster in year 1 guarantees a playoff semifinalist.

we've lost two of the team's most important pieces and it shows. lsu doesn't lose the kentucky game if keys is on the bench, and i think the same could be said for ole miss if green and spears aren't missing.

do i love the results? no, but i'm also not completely incapable of contextualizing.

your opinion is a fine one, and i think any reasonable person agrees royal is pretty elite. there also needs to be a stopping point; you think that # is higher than lsu's currently. no rule that says they can't reallocate money to different players / spots later as the roster gets shaped. you're just beating a pretty dead horse at this point though.

quote:

---

Berry??? He barely plays and gets tackled by a strong cross wind. Are you a Nicholson tiger alter because your takes are as stupid as his

---

Dude thinks we have 14 all SEC players on the roster.



Our 2nd string RB is all SEC.

No wonder the guy is so angry.

He said “type”, not who will be all-sec at the end of the year.
But expecting the unintelligent to read is my fault honestly.

quote:

---

He said “type”, not who will be all-sec at the end of the year.

---

ok. Now that you know what I'm referencing when I listed 5 Ole Miss players that are legit All SEC "types" right now, give me LSUs equivalent list.

I'll answer it for you. It's going to be a very comparable list. Then you'll have to deal with the inherent advantage of having an elite QB which is by far the most important position and impacts all others.

In the end, nobody would look at the two rosters and say "LSU would really have to screw up to lose to an inferior team like Ole Miss". That's absurd. Ole Miss has the better QB, the better WR, the better RB and the better DT. Ole Miss has ELITE talent on that roster...certainly enough to win at home vs. LSU.