- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legitimate Question for Experts
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:01 pm to Rollie Fingers
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:01 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:
I believe not aggressively recruiting quality lineman every season is a bad strategy. That is a reasonable concern.
So no one agrees with this?
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:01 pm to 7 Moves
quote:
all of the best athletes that we offered except Travon
Mike Davis
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:02 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:
Maclin projects as more of an OLB hopefully.
Definitely DE.
quote:
You got about 10 DEs there a and a couple of guards.
Marsh and Blackmon are DTs all the way.
Evan Washington is a G/T.
Jordan Allen is probably an OT.
And that's just this year.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:03 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:Everyone agrees with this, but we ARE, so it's a useless post.
I believe not aggressively recruiting quality lineman every season is a bad strategy. That is a reasonable concern.
So no one agrees with this?
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:04 pm to TexasTigah
So everyone is concerned about a thin depth chart at DT next season, but everyone is ok with waiting until next year to address this position?
This post was edited on 12/21/09 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:06 pm to Rollie Fingers
There aren't any DTs worth taking over the guys next year. What's the point of taking them now when better talent will be at LSU the entire time?
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:06 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:
What the recruits think of the class is important
and they come here and read this site. Thanks for telling them they smell like shite.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:07 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:
So everyone is concerned about a thin depth chart at DT next season, but everyone is ok with waiting until next year to address this position?
Why is it thin?
Drake Nevis
Josh Downs
Chris Davenport
Mike Brockers
Bennie Logan
plus the freshmen. That gives you a rotation of at least 5 guys plus whichever freshmen can play.. that's not exactly thin... and I didn't even count Hicks.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:10 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:
So everyone is concerned about a think depth chart at DT next season, but everyone is ok with waiting until next year to address this position?
I've always been under the impression one of Logan/Brockers will be a DT. Hicks is still on the team.
Marsh is pretty highly recruited. Blackmon doesn't have the ranking but the coaches were obviously impressed with him. Still recruiting Ego pretty hard who could end up on the inside.. I don't know of many else DT's we really had a shot at. Richard Ash came camp, and the coaches offered Blackmon over him..
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:10 pm to OBUDan
quote:
Why is it thin?
Drake Nevis
Josh Downs
Chris Davenport
Mike Brockers
Bennie Logan
plus the freshmen.
Don't forget about C. Hagains.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:10 pm to OBUDan
From all accounts, You have basically 2 DTs with SEC experience, and 3 with none. So in 2011 we can look forward to having the same problem with a bunch of talented but extremely inexperienced players at the DT position. This is why you have to recruit the most important position in the SEC more aggressively each season.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:11 pm to Luke4LSU
quote:
Hey guys. I was over on Wikipedia looking up "Epic Failure", and they linked me to this thread.
What's going on in here?

This thread makes about as much sense as this picture.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:12 pm to TheHiddenFlask
Why don't you and P Bean find a massage parlor somewhere and go catch hepititus A. There are grown men talking in this thread.
This post was edited on 12/21/09 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:15 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:
I believe not aggressively recruiting quality lineman every season is a bad strategy.
LSU is recruiting quality lineman. Not everyone wants to come to LSU.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:18 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:
From all accounts, You have basically 2 DTs with SEC experience, and 3 with none. So in 2011 we can look forward to having the same problem with a bunch of talented but extremely inexperienced players at the DT position. This is why you have to recruit the most important position in the SEC more aggressively each season.
Next year we'll obviously have to play lineman with little to no experience. It's hard to say after that as we have really no idea who's going to rotate next year and what position they'll really be playing. From Chavis's preseason conferences it looked like he wanted to rotate the defensive line more we just didn't have the talent/depth to do it. Now that the guys have had a year in the weightroom/system they may be ready next year we'll see.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:27 pm to Javzz
quote:
Why don't you and P Bean find a massage parlor somewhere and go catch hepititus A. There are grown men talking in this thread.
Dude, what is up with these types of comments... you better b over 40 talkin all retarded like this...
p.s. it think everyone pretty much thinks this a bogus thread and topic, sorry man suck it up, this thread sux its not the end of the world... its just a crappy topic that nobody wants to discuss, and I dont think the 2010 class has turned into sh*t, lol, the class may still end up rated in the top 5.... if this class sucks, then tell that to all the 2010 recruits ya deusche, arse, arsehole, ignoramus, idiont, grown man, etc...
This post was edited on 12/21/09 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 12/21/09 at 4:31 pm to P bean
quote:
and they come here and read this site. Thanks for telling them they smell like shite
haha, good call!
Posted on 12/21/09 at 5:08 pm to Rollie Fingers
quote:
So in 2011 we can look forward to having the same problem with a bunch of talented but extremely inexperienced players at the DT position
Not really.
Last year we enter with Drake Nevis, Charles Alexander (on half of one leg now) and Al Woods.
Every other expected contributor was a newcomer to the program.
Next year we have Nevis, Downs (with a year of experience and conditioning), a coached up Davenport, Brockers, Logan, etc. All these guys have at least a year of practice under their belts not to mention all the weight training etc.
Plus, Davenport is the type of prospect that should be able to play right away... and DT isn't a mentally demanding position, so asking young guys to step in is usually an issue of size/technique rather than knowledge.
Our depth at DT will be light years ahead next year of what it was this year.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 5:11 pm to OBUDan
quote:
Our depth at DT will be light years ahead next year of what it was this year.
Depth, yes; Experience, no.

The DL will soon be the strength of the entire team. Maybe not this next year, but probably the year after.
--------------
BTW, Cordian Hagans moved off to OL.
Popular
Back to top
