- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Final Rankings (I guess these can still be adjusted)
Posted on 2/4/15 at 5:29 pm to Memphricabra
Posted on 2/4/15 at 5:29 pm to Memphricabra
quote:
So here is the composite Team Rankings from all 4 services:
The biggest key for any of these schools is whether they addressed their needs. It does not do you a lot of good to be talent rich in a few postions and hurting in others. Only time will tell on that
0
Posted on 2/4/15 at 5:31 pm to dreaux
quote:
I know how to average dude lol
I did the same thing. It's just another way to look at it.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 5:33 pm to hater22
So is Tennessee's
That makes me a little warm inside for obvious reasons.
That makes me a little warm inside for obvious reasons.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 5:35 pm to Minnesota Tigah
quote:
Scout is a joke. 13 is a joke with this class
did all the guys that work at Scout leave for 247?
I think it was a mass exodus
Kind of discouraging to see LSU range from 13- down to 5..
Not a perfect science, but wow, I do feel our class is pretty strong...way better than 13
I bet the NFL draft will bear that out in a few years
Posted on 2/4/15 at 5:39 pm to WacoTiger
I guess I'm a negatard because I just don't feel satisfied with this class. It's like going to a five star restaurant and ordering a $35 entrée that has only about 2 oz. of food on it. It's good, rich food, but doesn't offer enough sustenance to fill you up. Sure, we needed DB's and OL prospects, and that's great along with the 4-5 star athletes. But forget the formulas that calculate the total team number and value per commit for the rankings: We signed 3 TE's who we never use in the first place, 2 special teams guys, and WR's that will only be productive if we can get the ball to them. We need ballers who will control the line of scrimmage and stop the run game. Makes me sick to see rivals and other SEC teams sign potentially dominant guys like Payne (AL), Mack (TAM), Beckner Jr. (Mizzou). And then Leo Lewis to Moo State instead of us. Moton, too. I sure hope the 2016 class brings us the D-Linemen and LB's that everyone is talking about.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 6:00 pm to TNTigerman
I'll make it happen, if you get the girl in your Avatar to change the Oregon shoes.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 6:27 pm to PG
That front 7 is what I'm worried about. A top level front 7 makes everything else look better.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 6:29 pm to shoelessjoe
quote:
I'll take this all day. Also consider that LSU didn't score many points signing long snapper and punter.
Zero, "0" points for both positions - any top 10 class is a great year - only disappointment here is the lack of a top LB - never put a great deal creditably in the * rankings, look what this staff has done to develop the so called 2 & 3 * athletes, NFL is full of these guys
Posted on 2/4/15 at 6:33 pm to hater22
quote:
Auburn class is SICK.... Watch out in years to come
Had they got cece or martez or chidi probably, but we outrank them. Lots of OLB's tho, kinda like our 2016 class.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 6:37 pm to Good Times
quote:
I'll make it happen, if you get the girl in your Avatar to change the Oregon shoes
Would look even better without shoes. That's the American Sniper's wife.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 6:46 pm to TNTigerman
Sagan used to say te's are versatile and can be lb, de even we. Steele may be from that school. We got the # 1 lb in last years class. Lean de are modern lb as are heavy safeties. It's going to work out fine. The OL with our rb are going to be sensational. Now, if a qb will step up.....
Posted on 2/4/15 at 6:49 pm to TNTigerman
I'm like you. Disappointed.
I mean...our offense sucked last year and most of our highly rated players are there.
Out defense was best in the sec but we only sign 6 for the whole group lol
I mean...our offense sucked last year and most of our highly rated players are there.
Out defense was best in the sec but we only sign 6 for the whole group lol
Posted on 2/4/15 at 7:21 pm to Datbayoubengal
Muschamp defense with that offense is going to be really tough to beat.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 8:58 pm to shoelessjoe
I don't understand why we(other teams too) are giving a scholly to a guy that just snaps the ball back 14 yards. Since the rules change they don't even have a defensive lineman in front of them anymore to hit them as soon as the ball is snapped! All they have to do is look between their legs and snap the ball. Why can't a backup lineman be trained to do this?
Posted on 2/4/15 at 9:02 pm to Memphricabra
Bc punting is a huge component to the LSU offense
Posted on 2/4/15 at 9:07 pm to TNTigerman
quote:
WR's that will only be productive if we can get the ball to them.
I wish our WRs could be more productive even if we can't get them the ball too.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 9:16 pm to WacoTiger
I personally think SC has the best class and it complements their 2014 class really well.
Posted on 2/4/15 at 9:21 pm to WacoTiger
Edit...or not....earlier today they had us with the same points it seemed. Maybe not.
This post was edited on 2/4/15 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:17 pm to Memphricabra
I think it is based on the composite ranking of players then uses the same points system to assign each class it's value
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News