re: Why was my thread about my sea serpent sighting anchored?

quote:

---

6. A thread has gone off topic. If the replies inside a thread have nothing to do with the main idea in the subject, we often anchor.

---

quote:

---

Read the sticky at the top. Your thread clearly violates the off topic rule after the first few pages. It turns in to you and a bunch of others yahoos arguing and not mentioning the theory of sea serpents at all.

---

First of all, I don't appreciate you calling me a "yahoo".

Next, I'm already aware of that sticky.

I figured that would be the excuse used to anchor my thread.

My thread isn't about discussing the theory of sea serpents.

That's why I specifically entitled my thread, "For those people interested in my sea serpent sighting and video" not "Let's discuss the theory of sea serpents".

When some skeptics invaded the thread and started insulting me then I had no choice but to defend myself and in the process I gave the skeptics information about my sightings and videos.

When someone posts something disagreeing with me in a civil manner then I respond in a civil manner.

For example, when someone claimed that I just saw an oarfish then I very civilly went into great detail to explain to them why the animal I saw wasn't an oarfish.

I have no problem having a civil discussion with skeptics but apparently skeptics have a problem being civil to me.

Then someone created a sockpuppet and tried to pass it as a sockpuppet created by me.

Am I supposed to sit back and let someone discredit my character like that?

HELL NO!!!

There's one poster out there who knows they are the person who created the sockpuppet and that person isn't me.

Now you can use whatever excuse you want to anchor my thread because I've dealt with the skeptics on this site the way they deserved to be dealt with.

My sightings and videos of sea serpents are already known about all over the world so I don't need to waste any more of my time discussing it here with some skeptics who just insult me and don't appreciate the information I have to give them.

I am ending the discussion on the thread so the skeptics get what they want.

BTW, I don't care how many biased skeptics down vote me.

quote:

---

When some skeptics invaded the thread and started insulting me then I had no choice but to defend myself

---

Ya. That’s exactly where the thread went off topic.

quote:

---

I don't need to waste any more of my time discussing it here

---

Don’t let the door hit you on the way out

quote:

---

DawgfaninCa

---

Sometimes, even I have bad days. Like when I created you...

quote:

---

I have no idea what the frick you're talking about, but I vote no to whatever it is you're asking for.

---

Well, it's nice to know you and 15 other people don't know what I am talking about but still downvoted me.

quote:

---

This is the most consistent, heavy downvoting I’ve ever seen on the help board.



I have no idea if that’s even worded correctly, but I think y’all know what I mean.

---

There are a lot of biased skeptics on this site who can't handle the truth so they shoot the messenger by downvoting me.

quote:

---

This is the most consistent, heavy downvoting I’ve ever seen on the help board.

---

The amount of people lurking this thread just to downvote OP is one of the most inspiring team efforts I've ever seen on TD

quote:

---

The amount of people lurking this thread just to downvote OP is one of the most inspiring team efforts I've ever seen on TD

---

I've always been good at getting people to organize.

quote:

---

First of all, I don't appreciate you calling me a "yahoo".

Next, I'm already aware of that sticky.

I figured that would be the excuse used to anchor my thread.

My thread isn't about discussing the theory of sea serpents.

That's why I specifically entitled my thread, "For those people interested in my sea serpent sighting and video" not "Let's discuss the theory of sea serpents".

When some skeptics invaded the thread and started insulting me then I had no choice but to defend myself and in the process I gave the skeptics information about my sightings and videos.

When someone posts something disagreeing with me in a civil manner then I respond in a civil manner.

For example, when someone claimed that I just saw an oarfish then I very civilly went into great detail to explain to them why the animal I saw wasn't an oarfish.

I have no problem having a civil discussion with skeptics but apparently skeptics have a problem being civil to me.

Then someone created a sockpuppet and tried to pass it as a sockpuppet created by me.

Am I supposed to sit back and let someone discredit my character like that?

HELL NO!!!

There's one poster out there who knows they are the person who created the sockpuppet and that person isn't me.

Now you can use whatever excuse you want to anchor my thread because I've dealt with the skeptics on this site the way they deserved to be dealt with.

My sightings and videos of sea serpents are already known about all over the world so I don't need to waste any more of my time discussing it here with some skeptics who just insult me and don't appreciate the information I have to give them.

I am ending the discussion on the thread so the skeptics get what they want.

BTW, I don't care how many biased skeptics down vote me.

---

Jesus H Christ oweo.... you should be able to post to the sec rant with your current username like everyone else. I ain’t reading all that shite

quote:

---

First of all, I don't appreciate you calling me a "yahoo".

Next, I'm already aware of that sticky.

I figured that would be the excuse used to anchor my thread.

My thread isn't about discussing the theory of sea serpents.

That's why I specifically entitled my thread, "For those people interested in my sea serpent sighting and video" not "Let's discuss the theory of sea serpents".

When some skeptics invaded the thread and started insulting me then I had no choice but to defend myself and in the process I gave the skeptics information about my sightings and videos.

When someone posts something disagreeing with me in a civil manner then I respond in a civil manner.

For example, when someone claimed that I just saw an oarfish then I very civilly went into great detail to explain to them why the animal I saw wasn't an oarfish.

I have no problem having a civil discussion with skeptics but apparently skeptics have a problem being civil to me.

Then someone created a sockpuppet and tried to pass it as a sockpuppet created by me.

Am I supposed to sit back and let someone discredit my character like that?

HELL NO!!!

There's one poster out there who knows they are the person who created the sockpuppet and that person isn't me.

Now you can use whatever excuse you want to anchor my thread because I've dealt with the skeptics on this site the way they deserved to be dealt with.

My sightings and videos of sea serpents are already known about all over the world so I don't need to waste any more of my time discussing it here with some skeptics who just insult me and don't appreciate the information I have to give them.

I am ending the discussion on the thread so the skeptics get what they want.

BTW, I don't care how many biased skeptics down vote me.

---

This isn't coming from a stable person

quote:

---

This isn't coming from a stable person

---

Are you a Psychiatrist?

I'm not but I know that righteous indignation is not a sign that a person is unstable and neither is fighting back against people who accused them of something they didn't do.

Hell, a person would be crazy if they weren't righteously indignant and didn't fight back against people who accused them of something they didn't do.