Started By
Message

Runner's World magazine

Posted on 1/1/19 at 11:07 am
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 11:07 am
Yeah, I know magazines are becoming relics of the past.
But in year's past, I enjoyed this magazine. Nice articles, photos, etc.

Now, it totally sucks. Worthless.
I had a annual subscription for $5, and I wonder if it was a waste of money.
Posted by PeepleHeppinBidness
Manchester United Fan
Member since Oct 2013
3553 posts
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:40 pm to
In the last few months, RW hired a new editor who changed the direction of the magazine. It is now less visual and more content based, with a greater focus on in-depth articles. The reason given for the shift was that all the pictorials and lighter columns can be found on the website.
This post was edited on 1/1/19 at 1:41 pm
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23008 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:12 pm to
In my experience RW is way too marathon focused. I understand that it sounds fancy and marathons are a big name thing, but not all of us are marathoners. I would've loved to see some 5k track workouts, gait analysis articles, etc. But it seemed like it turned into a shoe advertisement magazine with some marathon highlights thrown in.
Posted by aileron
H-Town
Member since Apr 2018
246 posts
Posted on 1/4/19 at 10:09 pm to
Totally agree. I used to read it cover to cover every month but then they fired Wiley and brought in some non-runner chick and it went to crap. Guess they realized the mistake and canned her too. Now it's like 10 pages of running stuff and 20 pages of shoe reviews every month. I assume the shoe companies are keeping it afloat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram