Started By
Message

Moving from Tirz to Reta

Posted on 11/4/26 at 11:24 am
Posted by King of New Orleans
In front of The Hungry Tiger
Member since Jul 2011
11274 posts
Posted on 11/4/26 at 11:24 am
Anyone done it? How was it?

I’ve dropped 35 on Tirz but hear Reta is next level with stubborn belly fat. Does it kill the appetite like Tirz does?
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
31421 posts
Posted on 11/4/26 at 7:01 pm to
The only difference I noticed was the price and Reta made me wake up at 3:00 am wide awake every morning.

I went back to Tirz.

I’ve lost 94 lbs in 2 1/2 years taking Tirz and working out daily.
Posted by Bleed P&G
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2003
3172 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:01 am to
Just my 2 cents from having taken both... don't do it. Tirz is much better at appetite suppression. You will take Reta and feel like its not working because you don't get the same "feels" as you do with Tirz.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
39360 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 7:04 pm to
No doesn’t kill appetite like tirz but it is better in terms of fat loss and if used in a bulk for muscle gain

But most people don’t feel it as much so they assume not working

If you lift and actually count macros…use Reta

If you are not counting calories and macros use tirz
This post was edited on 11/5/26 at 7:06 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram