- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LGD-4033 and SR9009 - SARM discussion
Posted on 11/14/18 at 8:10 pm to lsu777
Posted on 11/14/18 at 8:10 pm to lsu777
lol No shite? I suspect OP is late 30's, maybe early 40s? Done having kids, natural production is already on the decline, might as well switch over to TRT than fricking around with research chemical sarms, and have the benefits of sarms while improving quality of life. At least while on TRT you're forced to get blood work.
This post was edited on 11/14/18 at 8:12 pm
2
Posted on 11/14/18 at 8:38 pm to lsu5803tiger
That's not exactly a medical diagnosis. There's a lifetime of cost and effect involved.
SARMS at least are designed for single cycles and resetting natrual hormone production between cycles. It's apples and oranges and TRT is not going to have nearly the same effect on the body long term.
SARMS at least are designed for single cycles and resetting natrual hormone production between cycles. It's apples and oranges and TRT is not going to have nearly the same effect on the body long term.
Posted on 11/14/18 at 8:55 pm to lsu5803tiger
You don't go on trt for that kind of bullshite, that is what a cycle is for.
Don't recommend trt when you are really saying he should run a cycle. Trt is a lifetime decision.
Don't recommend trt when you are really saying he should run a cycle. Trt is a lifetime decision.
Posted on 11/14/18 at 9:14 pm to lsu777
Ok, go ahead and run a SARM 'cycle'(which by the I think the majority of them haven't even been green lighted for actual medical use; ostarine even fricks with your vision). So you do a 'cycle,' you still get your natural production suppressed have to take a 'pct' and eventually you're back at square one. What I was suggesting if the OP is at a point in his life where he was comfortable, maybe he should look into TRT for health benefits, as I mentioned he would have his health monitored by bloodwork whenever the clinic requires it. In my opinion I would just abstain from SARMs period, the benefits aren't worth it.
Posted on 11/14/18 at 9:24 pm to lsu5803tiger
But trt doesn't give the benefits of the sarms the way the op is talking about. It only replaces natural production. Unless he has low test already he isn't going to notice a difference except a lighter pocket book.
Total test o lf 600ng/do is the same no matter if the body produces it or you take it naturally.
Sure he could blast and cruise but why? He got bad arse results from something that only mildly shuts you down. He can recover with a very mild pct.
Most steroids on the market where never approved for human consumption either. Don't see people saying don't use tren or only use tren hex because that's the only ester ever approved anywhere. Wasn't approved in the us either.
Taking steroids is essentially a lifetime decision for many especially those in their 30s. We shouldn't be encouraging taking it nor taking sarms on this board. We shouldn't discourage either.
If somebody ask a question about it somebody should relay facts and facts only, not conjecture and let the person make the decision themselves. That includes talking about all the risk that come with that. Not just think of the gains bro. You didn't do that but it's the principal of the point I am trying to make.
Total test o lf 600ng/do is the same no matter if the body produces it or you take it naturally.
Sure he could blast and cruise but why? He got bad arse results from something that only mildly shuts you down. He can recover with a very mild pct.
Most steroids on the market where never approved for human consumption either. Don't see people saying don't use tren or only use tren hex because that's the only ester ever approved anywhere. Wasn't approved in the us either.
Taking steroids is essentially a lifetime decision for many especially those in their 30s. We shouldn't be encouraging taking it nor taking sarms on this board. We shouldn't discourage either.
If somebody ask a question about it somebody should relay facts and facts only, not conjecture and let the person make the decision themselves. That includes talking about all the risk that come with that. Not just think of the gains bro. You didn't do that but it's the principal of the point I am trying to make.
Posted on 11/14/18 at 9:51 pm to lsu777
I mentioned if he's later in life to make that decision, done having kids, and if his natural production is in decline. I wasn't advocating taking a research chemical for fleeting results.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News