Started By
Message

Full body cancer scans

Posted on 1/5/24 at 11:45 pm
Posted by lsuguru
Lake Charles
Member since Aug 2007
1782 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 11:45 pm
Curious if anybody on the board has any experiences with these type of scans or programs. I know Houston has a few of them. My family is riddled with cancer and I work in the plants. I'm always nervous about something popping up and not finding out about it until it's too late. Waste of money or good investment?
Posted by Stoic Poser
South LA
Member since Apr 2023
331 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 11:59 pm to
Sounds like you know the answer already
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
15040 posts
Posted on 1/6/24 at 5:29 am to
I've known more than my share of cancer patients and it is almost always diagnosed after it has been around for a while and sometimes limiting what can be done about it.

Usually due to some type injury or illness having them seeking x-rays, MRI's or CT scans only to find cancer during those scans.

Nothing wrong with being proactive on something like this, especially if there's a family history involved. Treating cancer, in its advanced stages is not cheap or easy on the body.
Posted by DrDenim
By the airport
Member since Sep 2022
435 posts
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:42 am to
The main obstacle you'll run into with anything that involves radiation is "Does this person have a medical need that justifies exposing them to radiation, (which is itself a risk factor for cancer)?" That's the question you and your doctor should be asking in my opinion.

Is it a waste of money or a good investment?

Valid question, but not the most important one. You need a professional to help you break down the risk/reward here.

Based on what you've said about family history and your current exposure risk to carcinogens at work, I'd think you could make a good case for yourself, BUT....be prepared to hear no. I could imagine your doctor saying no, and telling you that unless there are symptoms present that you would just be getting this scan to soothe your anxiety, and it's not worth the risk from radiation exposure for just that.

Also, what if the scan shows something? You ready to deal with that? This is why I hope for you that you have someone you know and trust well who has the expertise to talk this through with you.

I'd write down all the family members that had cancer, what kind of cancer, at what age were they diagnosed, what treatment did they receive, and what was the outcome. Try and compare yourself now to them. What age are you? Did they have similar risk factors to you?(work in a plant). To me, it's a lot of questions and thinking and ultimately you have to decide. I know you could just pay out of pocket and go do it, but if you haven't already thought about this a great deal I hope you do. A full body CT scan is a big dose of radiation.
Posted by LSU4lyfe
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2003
7803 posts
Posted on 1/6/24 at 6:00 pm to
Insurance won’t approve it. Just set aside some money every year for a PET scan. Here’s a shocker…… it’s not that much more than if you do it with insurance. Fighting the insurance battle isn’t worth it
This post was edited on 1/6/24 at 6:50 pm
Posted by Stoic Poser
South LA
Member since Apr 2023
331 posts
Posted on 1/6/24 at 6:08 pm to
I wasn’t trying to be a wise arse in my original response; I am in a very similar situation.

My father and his youngest brother both died from bile duct cancer and pancreatic cancer, respectively. Dad was 75 and brother was 63. Currently my uncle, the middle brother between my dad and other uncle is about a year into pancreatic cancer also. Lots of things to think about.

Posted by guedeaux
Tardis
Member since Jan 2008
13609 posts
Posted on 1/7/24 at 8:29 pm to
Waste of money. Why scan your whole body if you are really worried about one section of your abdomen?

What do your GI and/or oncologist think about it? If you don't have regular checkups with one or both of these doctors, with your family history, start now.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162209 posts
Posted on 1/7/24 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Waste of money. Why scan your whole body if you are really worried about one section of your abdomen?


Thankfully you can only get cancer in areas where you're worried about it
Posted by guedeaux
Tardis
Member since Jan 2008
13609 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:45 am to
Ackually, I thought the OP and the poster above me were the same, so my comment was targeted to the person concerned about bile duct/pancreatic.

The point does remain to the OP: Talk to oncology specialists in the fields where you have family history of cancer. Whole body scans using PET or similar tech are not very sensitive except for subsets of cancers.

Perhaps it makes sense for some folks with certain histories, but not for the general population; therefore, establishing relationships with oncology specialists and discussing your family history along with your current lifestyle and health should be your first step for prevention or early detection.

Hell, for some people surgery to remove organs before cancer develops could be a better choice than whole body scans. For instance and regardless of the presence of cancer on imaging, females with BRCA mutations who no longer want children could have their fallopian tubes removed (not their ovaries) to almost completely eliminate their high chances of developing ovarian cancer.
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 7:48 am
Posted by BAMBAM
Biloxi, MS
Member since Mar 2008
2364 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 8:05 am to
I had an older vendor (male) tell me he did a full body MRI I think for his 50th birthday. Him and his wife had no kids so they had everything they could ever want so he asked for that for his birthday present. It’s been a couple years so details are a little foggy.

They found some concerns related to his heart which made them schedule a cath procedure and the found blockage bad enough to warrant open heart surgery and it saved his life. They found a Groupon or something and got it done for $1000-1500 if I remember right.

He was lucky he did it.
Posted by Bricktop
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2004
321 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 4:40 am to
Look into the Grail test. It identify cancer cells at Stage 0. We offer at SYNC Life here in Baton Rouge.
Posted by NewOrleansBlend
Member since Mar 2008
1003 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 8:19 am to
Neither the Real world positive predictive value (% of positives that are true positives and not false positives) nor sensitivity to detect early stage (curable) cancer of the Galleri (grail) test is good. About 55% of positive test results are false positives and about 55% of people with stage I-III cancers tested negative.

This % of false positives and false negatives is too high to endorse its use in my opinion. Both have significant costs to the patient.

I think early detection testing will get there one day but it’s not there yet.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram