- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody try to take seed oils out of your diet....virtually impossible
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:08 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:08 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
You can’t make a coherent point and grovel back and forth from post to post
Again, I don't know what you're reading
0
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:08 pm to cajuns td
quote:
you likely won't see consequences on a 2000 cal jellybean/ Twinkie diet, but likely not a good idea long term.
Why is that?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:11 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
Most people eat more than 2000 cal a day. So eating 2000 cal of jelly beans will result in weight loss which should improve most blood markers. So, good in the short term.
Long term, you're missing protein, vitamins, minerals, and fiber. You'll eventually become malnourished
Please remind me again how retarded I am
Long term, you're missing protein, vitamins, minerals, and fiber. You'll eventually become malnourished
Please remind me again how retarded I am
This post was edited on 9/10/25 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:16 pm to cajuns td
quote:
Long term, you're missing protein, vitamins, minerals, and fiber. You'll eventually become malnourished
Sigh
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:26 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
You could just explain how what I've said is wrong. Please address my words, and not the straw man you've created in your head.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:27 pm to cajuns td
quote:
You could just explain how what I've said is wrong. Please address my words, and not the straw man you've created in your head.
I have like half a dozen times then you change your argument or make no point at all
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:28 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
It’s an extremely simple question, if protein and calories are equated, does food quality matter? Yes or no?
no, not for most people. if you have everything else in order, are under 15% bodyfat then sure we can talk about maximizing but other wise no it doesnt. plenty of studies show that. stop ignoring them.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:29 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
No, you're just making up things to help you articulate your point. No where have I said that food quality doesn't matter if calories are equated. You've fabricated this and ran with it
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:31 pm to cajuns td
quote:
No where have I said that food quality doesn't matter if calories are equated
Then how can seed oils not be harmful
Food quality either matters or it doesn’t. What is a main ingredient in all the foods one would define as “bad?”
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:32 pm to lsu777
quote:
no, not for most people. if you have everything else in order, are under 15% bodyfat then sure we can talk about maximizing but other wise no it doesnt. plenty of studies show that. stop ignoring them.
Yeah, most people are obese and would benefit from any type of caloric restriction
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:33 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
Because all available evidence indicates that unsaturated fats are better for cardiovascular health than saturated fats. Please address this directly and don't jump back to all processed foods
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:33 pm to lsu777
quote:
. if you have everything else in order,
Like your metabolic health? If you feel like shite and have metabolic distinction this is a lot harder to do
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:36 pm to cajuns td
quote:
Because all available evidence indicates that unsaturated fats are better for cardiovascular health than saturated fats.
No it doesn’t
I guess if you subscribe to all the data sponsored by big pharma and the corn lobby it does
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:38 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Like your metabolic health? If you feel like shite and have metabolic distinction this is a lot harder to do
making shite up
show the studies that have participants in a slight caloric deficit causing metabolic disorders or damage
please fricking do
you are just making shite up.
its not fricking hard...eat in a caloric deficit, eat 1g protein per lbs of bw, lift weights 3x per week progressively, walk 8k steps per day and you have 95% of being in perfect health covered.
metabolic health :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:40 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
All you have to do is provide any evidence.
LINK
Here's a meta analysis that includes 54 trials. I guess they're all big pharma or the corn lobby.
LINK
Here's a meta analysis that includes 54 trials. I guess they're all big pharma or the corn lobby.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:40 pm to lsu777
quote:
show the studies that have participants in a slight caloric deficit causing metabolic disorders or damage
I can’t, you still just don’t get it. Thermodynamics always wins, but how we get to that concept varies widely and is important. I’ve explained this to you 100 times.
I don’t know the answer to this, and neither do you, but why have instances of some cancers (particularly in young people) and metabolic diseases and allergies increased so much. Part of the reason, OF COURSE, is they’re just fatter. No doubt, but many of these diseases and disorders have outpaced the increase in obesity. So why?
I think we can all agree we are eating worse quality food full of pesticides and other chemicals. MAYBE, just maybe, that has something to do with it. Are there empirical peer reviewed studies for that? Of course not, for a lot of reasons. Some nefarious, some not. But just use your brain and your eyes man.
This post was edited on 9/10/25 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:40 pm to cajuns td
quote:
Here's a meta analysis that includes 54 trials. I guess they're all big pharma or the corn lobby.
Most of them, yes
Not to mention most of that is a decade or more old
This post was edited on 9/10/25 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:43 pm to lsu777
quote:
you are just making shite up.
The truth
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:45 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
and for the record all of the new data suggest seed oils are anti inflamatory
LINK
stop making shite up with fricking terms like metabolic health trying to get a rise out of people who dont know better
LINK
stop making shite up with fricking terms like metabolic health trying to get a rise out of people who dont know better
Posted on 9/10/25 at 1:47 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
how we get to that concept varies widely
no it doesnt vary widely
quote:
is important
no it isnt....we have covered this 100 times and i have provided dozens upon dozens of studies to prove you wrong
yet you claim I dont get it and I am just dumb and you are the smart one
all the doctors, all the data and lil ole LSU777 is just wrong and mingo is correct.
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News