- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If pro golfers were not paid to put a brand of clubs in their bag, what do you think they
Posted on 8/22/17 at 2:44 pm to ell_13
Posted on 8/22/17 at 2:44 pm to ell_13
Have you tried any of the MP's? (5/25/H5's)? I don't know much about your game but if you play/like the 765's I think you should be playing something more player iron vs game improvement.
1
Posted on 8/22/17 at 2:49 pm to DriverWedge3putt
quote:I'm aware. I was hoping to get a combo MP18 SC/MCC set. And the JPX 900 tours are not game improvement at all. But those and the forged felt better to me than the MP18s, especially on even slight misses. And no, I haven't hit any of the older MP models out there.
but if you play/like the 765's I think you should be playing something more player iron vs game improvement.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:38 pm to WildcatMike
I am surprised no one seems to think PXG might be a likely choice if endorsement money weren't a factor
I get that they are expensive for amatuers but for a pro, not so much.
Posted on 8/24/17 at 3:31 pm to WildcatMike
I'd bet that more players would bag Wilson Staff irons if they didn't have to worry about sponsors.
The Wilson Staff FG Tour 100 is golf porn:
and the Wilson Staff V6 irons are getting rave reviews this year:
The Wilson Staff FG Tour 100 is golf porn:
and the Wilson Staff V6 irons are getting rave reviews this year:
Posted on 8/25/17 at 6:15 pm to 40 Rouge
Dam! Those Wilson blades are pretty!
Unfortunately I got no better chance of hitting those consistently than I did in the first set of irons I ever bought new in 1977, Wison Staff Tour Blades 1-sw.
Back then there were no cavity backed perimeter weighted clubs
Had a sweet spot about the size of a dime.
Unfortunately I got no better chance of hitting those consistently than I did in the first set of irons I ever bought new in 1977, Wison Staff Tour Blades 1-sw.
Back then there were no cavity backed perimeter weighted clubs
Had a sweet spot about the size of a dime.
Posted on 8/25/17 at 8:17 pm to ell_13
quote:
I like the classic look of the Z765 over the JPX stuff anyway.
This is why I bought Srixon over Mizuno. Hit both the same.
Posted on 8/25/17 at 10:39 pm to Tigerbythetale
quote:
I am surprised no one seems to think PXG might be a likely choice if endorsement money weren't a factor
I was going to say anything but PXG.
Posted on 8/26/17 at 12:41 am to 40 Rouge
Those Wilson blades are sexy as fuuuuuuuu
Posted on 8/28/17 at 6:01 pm to Dawgsontop34
I have not had the oppirtunity to hit the PXG irons but I would think that their policy of using the most effective materials and best manufacturing processes regardless of cost would yield a superior club.
Posted on 9/13/17 at 8:25 am to WildcatMike
Golf World did an anonymous survey with tour professionals a couple of weeks ago.
Mizuno - 36%
TaylorMade - 23%
Titleist - 21%
Callaway - 9%
Srixon - 7%
Other - 4%
Mizuno - 36%
TaylorMade - 23%
Titleist - 21%
Callaway - 9%
Srixon - 7%
Other - 4%
Posted on 9/13/17 at 8:29 am to DesignTiger
Champions tour, right?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News