- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: QB predictions for NCAAF2014. They never get this right.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:44 pm to LukeSidewalker
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:44 pm to LukeSidewalker
The game is going to fricking suck anyway, who cares what they're rated.
2
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:49 pm to Tayday
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:53 pm to Tayday
I'm getting it just because of Ultimate Team
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:57 pm to mwlewis
I'm not getting it because frick you.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:01 pm to LukeSidewalker
I would say 90-93 is more fair for AJ and 94-96 for Murray.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:09 pm to brucevilanch
You would get WERKED
Posted on 5/18/13 at 8:51 pm to LukeSidewalker
You're missing a certain Heisman winner.
Manziel will likely be a 97-98. They won't make him a 99 because he's just a RS-Sophomore.
Manziel will likely be a 97-98. They won't make him a 99 because he's just a RS-Sophomore.
This post was edited on 5/18/13 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 5/18/13 at 9:21 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
David Ash: 87-88
Posted on 5/18/13 at 9:44 pm to JLock
quote:
David Ash: 87-88
That's about right. They had Gilbert rated 88 in NCAA 2011.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 9:51 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
I would say 90-93 is more fair for AJ and 94-96 for Murray
So what would you say about your qb? Did I even get the starter right?
Posted on 5/18/13 at 10:06 pm to LukeSidewalker
Marshall should be probably around 80-82, but probably 80. Good speed, acceleration, and arm strength. Pretty crappy accuracy. I agree with most of your others.
If I had to give AJ/Murray numbers, I'd say 92 AJ 94 Murray. I'm a little more strict on ratings, 96 and above to me are a rare commodity.
If I had to give AJ/Murray numbers, I'd say 92 AJ 94 Murray. I'm a little more strict on ratings, 96 and above to me are a rare commodity.
This post was edited on 5/18/13 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 5/19/13 at 2:01 am to LukeSidewalker
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/19/13 at 2:07 am
Posted on 5/19/13 at 8:40 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
96 and above to me are a rare commodity.
2 national championships and 30td to 3int, thats a rare commodity. 95, at least. Its a video game, not john grudens qb camp.
Posted on 5/19/13 at 5:01 pm to LukeSidewalker
Okay fine. I would still have Murray as a higher rated QB in the game. I just abide much closer to the FIFA style of rating players because a 96 or above rated player should be for the truly special players (Peyton Mannings, Herschel Walkers, etc...)
Posted on 5/19/13 at 8:10 pm to LukeSidewalker
Okay, you're going off of accomplishments and statistics that are largely a team thing. Video game attributes are based on an individual's skills.
Two national titles and a great season in efficiency does not immediately translate into GOAT arm strength, accuracy and awareness. The reason Luck was a 97-99 on 2012 (can't remember exactly) was because of his skills, which made him the biggest QB pro prospect in a decade.
That's why your "This ain't Gruden QB Camp" doesn't make sense and reeks of bias. It is all about the skills. He can be a great player on a great team, but a better player on a worse team is going to be rated higher because he's a better individual player and that's what they base these things on.
If Murray has a better arm, then he gets the better ratings.
Two national titles and a great season in efficiency does not immediately translate into GOAT arm strength, accuracy and awareness. The reason Luck was a 97-99 on 2012 (can't remember exactly) was because of his skills, which made him the biggest QB pro prospect in a decade.
That's why your "This ain't Gruden QB Camp" doesn't make sense and reeks of bias. It is all about the skills. He can be a great player on a great team, but a better player on a worse team is going to be rated higher because he's a better individual player and that's what they base these things on.
If Murray has a better arm, then he gets the better ratings.
This post was edited on 5/19/13 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 12:18 am to LukeSidewalker
Manziel-95
AJ-93
Murray-91
Mett-86
Shaw-88
Driskel-85
MS ST-87
bo Wallace-85
Nick marshll-77
Kiehl Frazier- -23
AJ-93
Murray-91
Mett-86
Shaw-88
Driskel-85
MS ST-87
bo Wallace-85
Nick marshll-77
Kiehl Frazier- -23
Posted on 5/20/13 at 1:21 am to TiggerWoods
quote:
Kiehl Frazier- -23
Posted on 5/20/13 at 9:44 am to mwlewis
Posted on 5/20/13 at 9:55 am to mwlewis
This thread is covered in Gump juices ... must leave now. 
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 9:56 am
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News