- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 4/14/18 at 5:29 pm to LSU Coyote
Posted on 4/14/18 at 5:29 pm to LSU Coyote
Or Intel, Raja is developing a desktop GPU for Intel to compete with both. Will it be worth a shite? Who knows with his track record, but he does have a much larger R&D budget so maybe.
2
Posted on 4/14/18 at 5:50 pm to UltimateHog
I really hope AMD develops a GPU that beats the 2080 at launch. I want a high res, high refresh monitor, but it has to have freesync or gsync
Posted on 4/14/18 at 5:54 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
Or Intel, Raja is developing a desktop GPU for Intel to compete with both
Sort of.. they won't be competing on the top end. Which sucks because that is where they have no competition.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 5:55 pm to bluebarracuda
quote:
really hope AMD develops a GPU that beats the 2080 at launch. I want a high res, high refresh monitor, but it has to have freesync or gsync
They will, 1yr later.
Edt: Probably 2yrs.
This post was edited on 4/14/18 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 4/14/18 at 6:06 pm to LSU Coyote
Vega 56 was intriguing given the initial $399 tag and the ability to flash to Vega 64 BIOS.
But mining and the lack of a competitor to the 1080ti really screwed Vega in general.
EDIT: Then Nvidia dropped the 1070ti, and that was that.
BTW, anyone seen the Nvidia GPP stuff released lately? Total BS if GPU makers have to completely rebrand their lineups just to comply with that.
But mining and the lack of a competitor to the 1080ti really screwed Vega in general.
EDIT: Then Nvidia dropped the 1070ti, and that was that.
BTW, anyone seen the Nvidia GPP stuff released lately? Total BS if GPU makers have to completely rebrand their lineups just to comply with that.
This post was edited on 4/14/18 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 4/14/18 at 6:19 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
Vega 56 was intriguing given the initial $399 tag and the ability to flash to Vega 64 BIOS.
But mining and the lack of a competitor to the 1080ti really screwed Vega in general.
Yeah. But no where near the top offerings from nVidia. Also 2yrs behind.
Vega wasn't that great of a launch. Really disappointed post mordom.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 6:24 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
lack of a competitor to the 1080ti really screwed Vega in general.
And that's all AMDs own damn fault. How can they just concede that?
They have everything in place to beat out Nvidia, but they just won't do it
This post was edited on 4/14/18 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 4/14/18 at 7:20 pm to bluebarracuda
Because they care more about the CPU marketplace. Ryzen had something like 20-30% higher R&D budget than the GPU division.
Vega was a success because of it being the best mining card available so it still sold like hot cakes, and because of what it accomplished for the data center space where it made big waves.
So for AMD it was all good, if you wanted a super high end gaming card then it was only partially good.
I wouldn't trade my $399 Vega 56 flashed to 64 and top tier monitor for a different setup. But I put a lot more emphasis on monitors.
Vega was a success because of it being the best mining card available so it still sold like hot cakes, and because of what it accomplished for the data center space where it made big waves.
So for AMD it was all good, if you wanted a super high end gaming card then it was only partially good.
I wouldn't trade my $399 Vega 56 flashed to 64 and top tier monitor for a different setup. But I put a lot more emphasis on monitors.
Posted on 4/14/18 at 7:31 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
top tier monitor for a different setup
At 1080p
quote:
But I put a lot more emphasis on monitors.
We all do, but most of us get video cards that will at least push the basics of our monitors
This post was edited on 4/14/18 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 4/14/18 at 9:21 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
Because they care more about the CPU marketplace. Ryzen had something like 20-30% higher R&D budget than the GPU division
Yes and no. They shifted focus because AMD had been pushed out every market. Do you remember our conversations on this topic?
quote:
Vega was a success because of it being the best mining card available so it still sold like hot cakes, and because of what it accomplished for the data center space where it made big waves.
They lucked into that scenario. Vega didn't challenge nVidia in the less. Really disappointed, we need them challenged.
This post was edited on 4/14/18 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 4/14/18 at 9:26 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
wouldn't trade my $399 Vega 56 flashed to 64 and top tier monitor for a different setup. But I put a lot more emphasis on monitors
Well we put everything into the whole system.
What is the point of having just a top tier you without top tier monitor or top of the line monitor with mid tier gpu?
These things go hand in hand.
This post was edited on 4/14/18 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 4/14/18 at 9:44 pm to LSU Coyote
Only UH can care about having top of the line stuff
Posted on 4/14/18 at 10:57 pm to bluebarracuda
quote:
At 1080p
What?
quote:
We all do, but most of us get video cards that will at least push the basics of our monitors
Bruh Vega 64 pushes 1440p perfectly, it's like 3-5% more powerful than a 1080.
This post was edited on 4/14/18 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 4/14/18 at 10:57 pm to LSU Coyote
quote:
Well we put everything into the whole system.
What is the point of having just a top tier you without top tier monitor or top of the line monitor with mid tier gpu?
These things go hand in hand.
Oh I was referencing your shitty basic 4K monitors, you've never had a legit high end monitor.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 1:16 am to UltimateHog
I need some advice. I have gaming pc with a 1080 card. I would like a good 4k monitor. What would be the best monitor to get under 700.00 ?
Posted on 4/15/18 at 2:35 am to robzillaaa
Korean.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 10:42 am to UltimateHog
quote:
I was referencing your shitty basic 4K monitors, you've never had a legit high end monitor.
Lol I've own everything from gsyncs, 120hz, 1440 and 2160s.
My favorite are CrossOvers. 2x32" 2160s @ 75hz is just fine. All other moniotors come with that annoying anti-glare stuff. I rather pure glossy.
How have I not? You don't understand all of here have owned everything. Why we know.
Edt: You are a truly ignorant.
This post was edited on 4/15/18 at 10:46 am
Posted on 4/15/18 at 10:53 am to LSU Coyote
UH drives an old arse 350z and probably makes fun of people that drive a 3 series not realizing the irony in that they are both douches.
In short, why do you waste time arguing with him?
In short, why do you waste time arguing with him?
Posted on 4/15/18 at 11:01 am to stout
I feel sorry for him. Truely.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 1:55 pm to LSU Coyote
You literally made fun of someone in a console thread a few weeks ago for faux 4K with a PS4 Pro while you yourself have faux 4K.
You just talk a big game but have cheap arse monitors. I find it hilarious.
For the money you spend on everything else, to skimp out on monitors. Oof.
You just talk a big game but have cheap arse monitors. I find it hilarious.
For the money you spend on everything else, to skimp out on monitors. Oof.
Page 1467 of 1912
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News