Started By
Message

re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts

Posted on 9/21/17 at 6:37 pm to
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

People at work started a Go-Fund me for us. I feel like shtt. Yes we lost everything in my apartment due to Harvey but it wasn't my house. I still have a lot more shtt.

How do you tell ppl no when they sort of force it on you?


I was glad people asked me first. I would be pissed if anyone begged for money on my behalf. I guess if it's already done just graciously accept it, hopefully it doesn't blow up into way more money than the target amount. At least with the Louisiana flood several of my coworkers were also affected, so all the attention wasn't focused on me.
Posted by bluebarracuda
Member since Oct 2011
19391 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 6:37 pm to
I agree 100% that I would go with the 7700k, but when you're on a budget, I'd much rather put that extra $100 into a better video card and get better performance. Especially if you're going to higher resolutions, where the CPU bottleneck isn't nearly as bad
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69473 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 7:23 pm to
If you're on a budget you go Ryzen, and then put the rest into the GPU. 7600K just doesn't make sense anymore.

The new Intel price brackets with the 8700K being 7700K price, will drop the 7700K quite a bit to make it a not nearly as big a step up in price by the time he specifically buys next year.

8700K MSRP is $388 and the leaked pricing has them at $349-399 for an unlocked 6c/12t CPU. $299 or less for a 7700K, I'd imagine will be able to find them regularly for $279ish maybe even less...The 8600K 6c/6t is at $284 MSRP.



I love that we are finally at the point of more cores/threads in PC gaming, talked about it for so long and it's here. Ryzen helped rush Intel along a bit quicker than most anticipated. Mainstream 6+ core affordable processors with most of your major titles now optimizing to make use of the extra cores. Fun times.
This post was edited on 9/21/17 at 7:35 pm
Posted by Devious
Elitist
Member since Dec 2010
29422 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

A 7600k/GTX1080 for the purposes he outlined is more than enough imo.
...but TH no longer recommends it.

fricking UH and his fanboy bullshite. We get it, you have AMD stock.
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69473 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 7:36 pm to
I'm recommending a 7700K you dumb frick.
Posted by Devious
Elitist
Member since Dec 2010
29422 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 7:53 pm to
Why you downvote me brah?
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69473 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 8:04 pm to
U dum
Posted by Devious
Elitist
Member since Dec 2010
29422 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:30 pm to
But my TD cred is all I got
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:48 pm to
For sure, any non-overclockable i5 is out of the question now. Otherwise, it really doesn't matter, because if your frame rate is at all limited by your CPU, you've fricked up.
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69473 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:16 pm to
You will recover, I promise.
Posted by Devious
Elitist
Member since Dec 2010
29422 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:30 pm to
I'm drinking to cope
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69473 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 12:06 am to
-1 for not blazing to cope.
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
56449 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by bluebarracuda
Member since Oct 2011
19391 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 2:54 pm to
What do y'all think about 32" 1440p monitors? I really like 27", but I found a good deal on a ASUS PB328Q. I sit probably 2ft away from my monitor now. Would 32" be too big for my FPS games (PUBG and H1Z1)?
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
56449 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 3:03 pm to
IDK.

@ 32" I would prefer 2160. 1440 @ 27" seems like the limit i'm comfortable with now.

I have 2 x CrossOvers 32" 2160s. Feel as though that is a good spot. The same as I felt with 27" 1440s.
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69473 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 5:55 pm to
I got a 32" TV for my kitchen just a few weeks ago and that reassured me 27" is as big as I want for PC. Just too big imo.


I absolutely love my 27" curved monitor, very immersive but takes some time to get used to.

HDR is still broken in Windows 10, has been since April when they introduced it. Works for games of course but not the desktop.
This post was edited on 9/22/17 at 5:58 pm
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69473 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 7:31 pm to
Think I'll be grabbing the 8700K when it launches, appears to be a beastly chip especially for that price. Reports of OC's hitting 5.3GHz.



quote:

Now when it comes to overclocking, there are kind of mixed reports. One Chinese source has said that 5.3 GHz on the Core i7-8700K and 5.0 GHz on the Core i3-8350K are possible with simple core tuning but you would require a good AIO cooler or high-end air coolers to keep these chips cooler under load.
Posted by Raz
Member since Oct 2006
8471 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 8:22 pm to
What's a good malware program these days? My league acct got hacked. PC should be clean but just want to be safe.
Posted by UltimateHog
Thailand
Member since Dec 2011
69473 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 8:52 pm to
Malwarebytes if you're wanting free.
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
26159 posts
Posted on 9/22/17 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

I'm drinking to cope


Try this to cope. Sorry it was so much fun I can't contain myself so downvote away.

first pageprev pagePage 1391 of 1912Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram